Teledelivery of Aural Rehabilitation to Improve Cochlear Implant Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Brewer, Diane Majerus [1 ,7 ]
Bernstein, Claire Marcus [2 ]
Calandrillo, Dominique [2 ]
Muscato, Nancy [3 ]
Introcaso, Kailey [3 ]
Bosworth, Cassandra [4 ]
Olson, Anne [5 ]
Vovos, Rachel [6 ]
Stillitano, Gina [6 ]
Sydlowski, Sarah [6 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Washington, DC USA
[2] Gallaudet Univ, Dept Hearing Speech & Language Sci, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Audiol & Speech Pathol Dept Otolaryngol, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Coll Hlth Sci, Commun Sci & Disorders, Lexington, KY USA
[6] Cleveland Clin, Hearing Implant Program, Cleveland, OH USA
[7] George Washington Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, 4312 Warren St,NW, Washington, DC 20016 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2024年 / 134卷 / 04期
关键词
aural rehabilitation; cochlear implants; psychosocial outcomes; speech recognition; telehealth; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADULTS; HEARING; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/lary.31031
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective(s): This randomized controlled study evaluated the effectiveness of a Telehealth Aural Rehabilitation (TeleAR) training protocol to improve outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) users.Methods: This was a multisite clinical study with participants randomized to either an AR treatment or active control group. The AR protocol consisted of auditory training (words, sentences, and speech tracking), informational counseling, and communication strategies. The control group participants engaged in cognitive stimulation activities (crosswords, sudoku, etc.). Each group completed 6 weekly 90-min individual treatment sessions delivered remotely. Twenty postlingually deafened adult CI users participated. Assessments were completed pretreatment and 1 week and 2 months posttreatment.Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA and planned contrasts were used to compare group performance on AzBio Sentences, Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). The two groups were statistically equivalent on all outcome measures at pre-assessment. There was a statistically significant main effect of time for all measures. Improvement over time was observed for participants in both groups, with greater improvement seen for the AR than the CT group on all outcome measures. The AR group showed medium to large effect sizes on all measures over time, suggesting clinically significant outcomes.Conclusion: This randomized controlled study provides evidence of improved speech recognition and psychosocial outcomes following 6 weeks of TeleAR intervention. For adult post-lingually deafened CI users, including those >3 months post-activation, AR treatment can leverage neuroplasticity to maximize outcomes.Level of Evidence2 Laryngoscope, 2023
引用
收藏
页码:1861 / 1867
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hearing rehabilitation outcomes in cochlear implant recipients with vestibular schwannoma in observation or radiotherapy groups: A systematic review
    Borsetto, Daniele
    Hammond-Kenny, Amy
    Tysome, James R.
    Axon, Patrick R.
    Donnelly, Neil P.
    Vijendren, Ananth
    Phillips, Veronica
    Bance, Manohar L.
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 21 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [42] The Effect of Personal Factors on Cochlear Implant Outcomes
    Tang, L.
    Clark, J.
    Semesky, P.
    Yeagle, J.
    Francis, H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 : S154 - S154
  • [43] Predictive Factors of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Elderly
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    Bebear, Jean-Pierre
    Marx, Mathieu
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Truy, Eric
    Lina-Granade, Genevieve
    Mondain, Michel
    Sterkers-Artieres, Francoise
    Bordure, Philippe
    Robier, Alain
    Godey, Benoit
    Meyer, Bernard
    Frachet, Bruno
    Poncet, Christine
    Bouccara, Didier
    Sterkers, Olivier
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2014, 19 : 15 - 20
  • [44] The Role of Sex on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes
    Raymond, Mallory J.
    Ballestas, Samir A.
    Wise, Justin C.
    Vivas, Esther X.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (10) : E984 - E988
  • [45] Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults
    Roberts, Daniel S.
    Lin, Harrison W.
    Herrmann, Barbara S.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (08): : 1952 - 1956
  • [46] Redefining Success in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Castellanos, Irina
    Mcrackan, Theodore R.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (07) : 535 - 536
  • [47] ALGORITHMS TO IMPROVE LISTENING IN NOISE FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS
    Hersbach, Adam A.
    Mauger, Stefan J.
    Grayden, David B.
    Fallon, James B.
    McDermott, Hugh J.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2013, : 428 - 432
  • [48] Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation in a developing country
    Olusanya, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (10) : 563 - 571
  • [49] IMPROVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS BY MIMICING THE VIABLE COCHLEAR ENVIRONMENT TO INDUCE NEURAL STEM CELLS TO DIFFERENTIATE INTO AUDITORY NEURONS
    Xue, Tao
    Qiao, Li
    Qiu, Jian-hua
    Lu, Lian-jun
    Zha, Ding-jun
    Chen, Fu-quan
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (01) : 178 - 179
  • [50] The pedagogical rehabilitation in the construction of the alphabetic writing of children with cochlear implant
    Hamerschmidt, Rogerio
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 90 (04)