Parametric Curve Comparison for Modeling Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Substructures

被引:0
|
作者
Ojo, Adebayo [1 ]
Collu, Maurizio [1 ]
Coraddu, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Naval Architecture Ocean & Marine Engn, Glasgow G4 0LZ, Scotland
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Maritime & Transport Technol, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
FOWT; design; optimization; parametric free-form; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/en16145371
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The drive for the cost reduction of floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) systems to the levels of fixed bottom foundation turbine systems can be achieved with creative design and analysis techniques of the platform with free-form curves to save numerical simulation time and minimize the mass of steel (cost of steel) required for design. This study aims to compare four parametric free-form curves (cubic spline, B-spline, Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline and cubic Hermite spline) within a design and optimization framework using the pattern search gradient free optimization algorithm to explore and select an optimal design from the design space. The best performance free-form curve within the framework is determined using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The TOPSIS technique shows the B-spline curve as the best performing free-form curve based on the selection criteria, amongst which are design and analysis computational time, estimated mass of platform and local shape control properties. This study shows that free-form curves like B-spline can be used to expedite the design, analysis and optimization of floating platforms and potentially advance the technology beyond the current level of fixed bottom foundations.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrodynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbine
    Chodnekar, Yeshwant Prabhu
    Mandal, Sukomal
    Rao, Balakrishna K.
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIAN AND PACIFIC COASTS (APAC 2015), 2015, 116 : 4 - 11
  • [22] Risk assessment of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
    Grasu, Gabriela
    Liu, Pengfei
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 1 - 18
  • [23] Experimental Modelling of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
    Lindquist, Christian
    Nielsen, Patrick
    Pedersen, Rikke
    Soltani, Mohsen
    2018 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS & MODELS IN AUTOMATION & ROBOTICS (MMAR), 2018, : 327 - 332
  • [24] GUIDELINE FOR OFFSHORE FLOATING WIND TURBINE STRUCTURES
    Ronold, Knut O.
    Hansen, Vigleik L.
    Godvik, Marte
    Landet, Einar
    Jorgensen, Erik R.
    Hopstad, Anne Lene H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 3, 2010, : 381 - 388
  • [25] SIMULATION OF VIM OF AN OFFSHORE FLOATING WIND TURBINE
    Passano, Elizabeth
    Grytoyr, Guttorm
    Haslum, Herbjorn
    Lie, Halvor
    Yin, Decao
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 8, 2022,
  • [26] A floating platform of concrete for offshore wind turbine
    Hua, Jianbo
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2011, 3 (06)
  • [27] Aerodynamic Behavior of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
    Lienard, C.
    Boisard, R.
    Daudin, C.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (09) : 3835 - 3847
  • [28] Flexible dynamic modeling and analysis of drive train for Offshore Floating Wind Turbine
    Li, Zhanwei
    Wen, Binrong
    Wei, Kexiang
    Yang, Wenxian
    Peng, Zhike
    Zhang, Wenming
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 : 1292 - 1305
  • [29] MULTI-FIDELITY AERODYNAMIC MODELING OF A FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE ROTOR
    Zhang, Kai
    Bilgen, Onur
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2020, VOL 10, 2020,
  • [30] Multibody modeling for concept-level floating offshore wind turbine design
    Frank Lemmer
    Wei Yu
    Birger Luhmann
    David Schlipf
    Po Wen Cheng
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2020, 49 : 203 - 236