Osteoinductive calcium phosphate with submicron topography as bone graft substitute for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A translational study

被引:2
|
作者
van Dijk, Lukas A. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Janssen, Nard G. G. [1 ]
Nurmohamed, Silke J. J. [1 ]
Muradin, Marvick S. M. [1 ]
Longoni, Alessia [1 ,2 ]
Bakker, Robbert C. C. [1 ]
de Groot, Florence G. [3 ]
de Bruijn, Joost D. D. [3 ,4 ]
Gawlitta, Debby [1 ,2 ]
Rosenberg, Antoine J. W. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Regenerat Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Kuros Biosci BV, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, London, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
bone graft substitutes; clinical study; osteoinductive calcium phosphate; preprosthetic dental surgery; sinus floor augmentation; submicron surface topography; translational research bone regeneration; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; AUTOGENOUS BONE; BIO-OSS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; DIFFERENT RATIOS; HEALING TIME; ELEVATION; BIOMATERIALS; MEMBRANE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14028
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was the preclinical and clinical evaluation of osteoinductive calcium phosphate with submicron surface topography as a bone graft substitute for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Material and MethodsA preclinical sheep model of MSFA was used to compare a calcium phosphate with submicron needle-shaped topography (BCPN, MagnetOs Granules, Kuros Biosciences BV) to a calcium phosphate with submicron grain-shaped topography (BCPG) and autologous bone graft (ABG) as controls. Secondly, a 10-patient, prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare BCPN to ABG in MSFA with two-stage implant placement. ResultsThe pre-clinical study demonstrated that both BCPN and BCPG were highly biocompatible, supported bony ingrowth with direct bone apposition against the material, and exhibited bone formation as early as 3 weeks post-implantation. However, BCPN demonstrated significantly more bone formation than BCPG at the study endpoint of 12 weeks. Only BCPN reached an equivalent amount of bone formation in the available space and a greater proportion of calcified material (bone + graft material) in the maxillary sinus compared to the "gold standard" ABG after 12 weeks. These results were validated in a small prospective clinical study, in which BCPN was found comparable to ABG in implant stability, bone height, new bone formation in trephine core biopsies, and overall clinical outcome. ConclusionThis translational work demonstrates that osteoinductive calcium phosphates are promising bone graft substitutes for MSFA, whereas their bone-forming potential depends on the design of their surface features.Netherlands Trial Register, NL6436.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 195
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Mixture of Autogenous Bone and Highly Pure Porous β-tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP): A Preliminary Study
    Hirota, Makoto
    Matsui, Yoshiro
    Mizuki, Nobuyuki
    Watanuki, Kei
    Ozawa, Tomomichi
    Iwai, Toshinori
    Tohnai, Iwai
    JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2009, 18 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [32] Maxillary sinus bone grafting with an injectable bone substitute: a sheep study
    Saffarzadeh, A
    Gauthier, O
    Humbert, T
    Weiss, P
    Bouler, JM
    Daculsi, G
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 16, 2004, 254-2 : 193 - 196
  • [33] Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Optimal Positioning of a Bone Graft Block
    Schuller-Goetzburg, Peter
    Forte, Thomas
    Pomwenger, Werner
    Petutschnigg, Alexander
    Watzinger, Franz
    Entacher, Karl
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [34] Bone augmentation using a new injectable bone graft substitute by combining calcium phosphate and bisphosphonate as composite—an animal model
    Carsten W. Schlickewei
    Georg Laaff
    Anne Andresen
    Till O. Klatte
    Johannes M. Rueger
    Johannes Ruesing
    Matthias Epple
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [35] A Comparative Study with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and Deproteinized Bovine Bone in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Oh, Ji-Su
    Seo, Yo-Seob
    Lee, Gyeong-Je
    You, Jae-Seek
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 233 - 242
  • [36] Preparation and properties of a porous calcium phosphate bone graft substitute
    Rabiee, S. M.
    Moztarzadeh, F.
    Kenari, H. S.
    Solati-Hashjin, M.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE-POLAND, 2007, 25 (04): : 1019 - 1027
  • [37] Allograft for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Retrospective Study of 90 Cases
    Guerrero, Jaime S.
    Al-Jandan, Badr A.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (02) : 136 - 140
  • [38] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Two Different Inorganic Bovine Bone Grafts: an Experimental Study in Rabbits
    Ferreira Balan, Vitor
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Masuda, Katsuhiko
    Pires Godoy, Eduardo
    Xavier, Samuel Porfirio
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (02): : 93 - 105
  • [39] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Surgery with Autogenous Bone Grafts as Ceiling: A Pilot Study and Test of Principle
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Telleman, Gerdien
    Vissink, Arjan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04) : 550 - 557
  • [40] Phycogenic bone substitutes for sinus floor augmentation: Histomorphometric comparison of hydroxyapatite and biphasic calcium phosphate in a randomised clinical pilot study
    Sokolowski, Alwin
    Sokolowski, Armin
    Schwarze, Uwe
    Theisen, Kerstin
    Payer, Michael
    Lorenzoni, Martin
    Wegscheider, Walther
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2020, 13 (04) : 387 - 399