Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast for Breast Reconstruction: A Short-Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Benjamin C. [1 ]
Drolet, Brian C. [2 ,3 ]
Perdikis, Galen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Biomed Eth & Soc, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, 1161 21st Ave South,Suite D-4207, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MASTECTOMY; VALIDITY; CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010620
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Breast reconstruction procedures are among the most commonly performed plastic surgery operations. Although there are well-validated patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for breast reconstruction, there are several patient-, provider-, and service-level barriers to their implementation in routine clinical settings. Therefore, we developed a short-form PROM to evaluate breast reconstruction outcomes. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, the Vanderbilt Mini-PROM-Breast (VMP-B) was constructed and validated to assess patient-reported outcomes from breast reconstruction. Classic test theory methods were used to evaluate acceptability, reliability, and validity. External validation was subsequently performed using the BREAST-Q as a reference standard. Results: The VMP-B is a 16-item instrument composed of three domains: quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. Psychometric properties including acceptability, reliability, and validity exceeded reference criteria. When tested with 104 patients, the authors found significant benefits of breast reconstruction on quality of life, body image, and breast satisfaction. These results were associated with sizeable effect sizes (g) (g = 0.421, g = 0.520, and g = 1.25) demonstrative of clinically meaningful results. When tested concurrently in 70 patients, the VMP-B and the BREAST-Q showed similar results, exhibiting excellent convergent validity. Conclusions: The VMP-B is a validated short-form PROM that reliably assesses breast reconstruction outcomes. As a short form, the VMP-B decreases both patient and provider burden, which allows for routine, point-of-care collection of breast reconstruction outcomes. Copyright (C) 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:291e / 302e
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Flanagan, Meghan R.
    Zabor, Emily C.
    Romanoff, Anya
    Fuzesi, Sarah
    Stempel, Michelle
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Gemignani, Mary L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (10) : 3133 - 3140
  • [32] A patient-reported experience measure for community pharmacy including development of a short-form: The perceived service quality scale
    Carter, Stephen R.
    Ng, Ricki
    El-Den, Sarira
    Schneider, Carl R.
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2022, 18 (08): : 3369 - 3378
  • [33] BREAST-Q Patient-reported Outcomes in Different Types of Breast Reconstruction after Fat Grafting
    Retchkiman, Meir
    Elkhatib, Arij
    Efanov, Johnny I.
    Gagnon, Alain
    Bou-Merhi, Joseph
    Danino, Michel Alain
    Bernier, Christina
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (02) : E4814
  • [34] A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Meghan R. Flanagan
    Emily C. Zabor
    Anya Romanoff
    Sarah Fuzesi
    Michelle Stempel
    Babak J. Mehrara
    Monica Morrow
    Andrea L. Pusic
    Mary L. Gemignani
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 3133 - 3140
  • [35] International phase 4 validation of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in breast reconstruction (BRR): evaluating the psychometric properties and clinical effectiveness
    Winters, Zoe E.
    Afzal, Maryam
    Rumpold, Gerhard
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Oberguggenburger, Anne
    Vieira, Renee A.
    Hartnup, Sue
    Flitcroft, Kathy
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Panouilleres, Marie
    Rydevik, Mani M.
    Catanuto, Giuseppe
    King, Madeleine
    Rutherford, Claudia
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 66 - 66
  • [36] Patient-reported outcome of their breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Robiolle, C.
    Quillet, A.
    Dagregorio, G.
    Huguier, V.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2015, 60 (03): : 201 - 207
  • [37] The Progress Tracker Breast Cancer Registry: Feasibility of a longitudinal patient-led, patient-reported outcomes (PROM) registry
    Leduc, Shaniah
    Gibson, Amanda Williams
    Dean, Michelle Liane
    Carson, Kimberly
    Khan, Omar Farooq
    Howell, Doris
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [38] CROWDSOURCING FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: A NOVEL TOOL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE
    Lin, Y.
    Vu, C. V.
    Gupta, S.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 64 (01) : 194 - 194
  • [39] Which Breast Is the Best? Successful Autologous or Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes
    Eltahir, Yassir
    Werners, Lisanne L. C. H.
    Dreise, Marieke M.
    van Emmichoven, Ingeborg A. Zeiffmans
    Werker, Paul M. N.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [40] Race and Ethnicity Impacts Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Minji
    Amakiri, Uchechukwu O.
    Wong, Frankie
    Barnett, Joshua
    Boe, Lillian A.
    Stern, Carrie S.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (01) : 551 - 561