Superior survival for breast-conserving therapy over mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: A population-based SEER database analysis across 30 years

被引:2
|
作者
Ke, Shanbao [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Li, Baiyu [1 ]
Feng, Xiao [1 ]
Yan, Danfang [2 ]
Liu, Jianbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ Peoples Hosp, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Oncol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
breast cancer; recurrence; cancer-specific survival; competing risk; propensity score weighting; SEER; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; COMPETING RISKS; STAGE-I; KAPLAN-MEIER; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; EORTC; 10801; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.1032063
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IntroductionIt has been believed that breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation, Lum + RT) and mastectomy without radiation (Mast + NoRT) have equivalent survival outcomes. However, there is a need to re-evaluate the role of lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation due to changed breast cancer management over time. This study aimed to conduct a population-based study that compare long-term oncologic survival outcomes after Lum + RT vs Mast + NoRT. MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify female breast cancer patients with a primary localized breast cancer diagnosis from 1988 to 2018. The standardized incidence/mortality ratio (SIR/SMR) for breast cancer recurrence (BCR) and breast cancer-specific death (BSD) was estimated by the SEER*Stat program. Cumulative incidences of BCR and BSD were assessed using Gray's method. We evaluated the effects of Lum + RT vs. Mast + NoRT on breast cancer recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Fine-Gray competing risk model analyses, propensity score-adjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards model analyses were applied. ResultsA total of 205,788 women were included in the study. Patients who underwent Lum + RT had higher SIR of BCR (4.14 [95% confidence interval, CI: 3.94-4.34] vs. 1.11 [95% CI: 1.07-1.14]) and lower SMR (9.89 [95% CI: 9.71-10.08] vs. 17.07 [95% CI: 16.82-17.33]) than patients who underwent Mast + NoRT. Lum + RT was associated with higher competing risk of BCR (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.996, 95% CI: 1.925-2.069, p < 0.001) and lower competing risk of BSD when compared to Mast + RT (adjusted HR: 0.584, 95% CI: 0.572-0.597, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed similar results (adjusted HR after PSW for BRFS: 1.792, 95% CI 1.716-1.871, p < 0.001; adjusted HR after PSW for BCSS: 0.706, 95% CI 0.688-0.725, p < 0.001). These findings persisted in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses. DiscussionThe present study further confirmed superior long-term survival with lumpectomy plus adjuvant radiation over mastectomy independent of patient characteristics including age, race, time period, historic subtype, tumor size, historic grade and stage, indicating that this benefit may result from the treatment itself.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Survival After Breast-Conserving Therapy Compared With Mastectomy in Stage I-IIA Breast Cancer
    Ratosa, I.
    Plavc, G.
    Zagar, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S85 - S86
  • [22] Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for older women with triple-negative breast cancer: population-based study
    Mburu, Waruiru
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Hodges, James S.
    Virnig, Beth A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (13) : 953 - 967
  • [23] Comparison of recurrence and survival rates after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy in young women with breast cancer
    Cao, J. Q.
    Olson, R. A.
    Tyldesley, S. K.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : E593 - E601
  • [24] Arm and shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy
    Nesvold, Inger-Lise
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Lokkevik, Erik
    Mengshoel, Anne Marit
    Fossa, Sophie D.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (05) : 835 - 842
  • [25] The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and mastectomy in metaplastic breast cancer: A population-based study
    Xia, Lin-Yu
    Xu, Wei-Yun
    Hu, Qing-Lin
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [26] Breast-conserving in centrally located breast cancer patients confirmed safe by SEER based study
    Shen, Yu-Fei
    Huang, Juan
    Zhou, Wei-Bing
    Li, Jian-Huang
    Xiao, Zhi
    Huang, A-Ji
    Liu, Xiang-Yan
    Hu, Yuan-Ping
    Li, Ting-Xuan
    Yang, Miao
    Cao, A-Yong
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (01) : 226 - 235
  • [27] Evaluation of the Benefit of Radiotherapy in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis of the SEER Database
    Kim, Byoung Hyuck
    Kwon, Jeanny
    Kim, Kyubo
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 50 (02): : 551 - 561
  • [28] Breast-conserving therapy is associated with better survival than mastectomy in Early-stage breast cancer: A propensity score analysis
    Ji, Jiali
    Yuan, Shushu
    He, Jiawei
    Liu, Hong
    Yang, Lei
    He, Xuexin
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (07): : 1646 - 1658
  • [29] Improved Survival after Breast-Conserving Therapy Compared with Mastectomy in Stage I-IIA Breast Cancer
    Ratosa, Ivica
    Plavc, Gaber
    Pislar, Nina
    Zagar, Tina
    Perhavec, Andraz
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (16)
  • [30] Occult breast cancer patients with mastectomy have better prognosis than those with breast-conserving therapy
    Li, Jiayi
    Liu, Gang
    Jia, Ziqi
    Ren, Fei
    Dong, Dawei
    Zhang, Menglu
    Wang, Xiang
    Wang, Yipeng
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2023, : 2405 - 2416