The effect of repair protocols and chewing simulation on the microtensile bond strength of two resin matrix ceramics to composite resin

被引:2
|
作者
Elkassaby, Annan Ahmed [1 ]
Kandil, Mohamed M. [1 ]
Alian, Ghada Atef [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Dept Dent Biomat Dent, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Polymer infiltrated ceramic network; Resin nanoceramics; Cyclic loading; Artificial aging; Mechanical fatigue; Mechanical aging; SURFACE TREATMENTS; CAD/CAM MATERIALS; BLOCKS; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-03932-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To assess the micro tensile bond strength (mu TBS) of two resin matrix ceramic (RMC) blocks bonded to composite resin by using different repair protocols with and without chewing simulation (CS). Materials and methods Two resin matrix ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate) were divided into 4 groups according to the surface treatments: Bur grinding (control), Bur grinding + silane, 9.5% HF acid etching, and 9.5% HF acid etching + silane. The single bond universal adhesive was applied on all specimens after the surface treatments according to the manufacturer's instructions, it was administered actively on the treated surface for 20 s and then light cured for 10 s, followed by incremental packing of composite resin to the treated surface. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups (with/without chewing simulation for 500,000 cycles). A micro tensile bond strength test was performed for each group (n = 15). The effect of surface treatments on the materials was examined by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The micro tensile bond strength (MPa) data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA, the independent t-test, and one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post-hoc test. Results mu TBS results were significantly higher for Lava Ultimate than Vita Enamic for all the surface treatment protocols with (p < 0.01). The chewing simulation significantly negatively affected the micro-tensile bond strength (p < 0.001). Bur grinding + saline exhibited the highest bond strength values for Lava Ultimate, both with and without chewing simulation. For Vita Enamic, bur grinding + saline and HF acid + saline showed significantly higher bond strength values compared to other surface treatments, both with and without chewing simulation (p <= 0.05). Conclusion Bur grinding + silane could be recommended as a durable repair protocol for indirect resin matrix ceramics blocks with composite resin material.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of Resin Composite Mechanical Properties on Adhesive Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin
    Goracci, Cecilia
    Margvelashvili, Mariam
    Apicella, Davide
    Sedda, Maurizio
    Magni, Elisa
    Ferrari, Marco
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 13 (04): : 323 - 331
  • [32] Microtensile bond strength between a composite resin and an alumina ceramic: Effect of intra-oral porcelain repair system.
    Leite, F.
    Kimpara, E. T.
    Valandro, L. F.
    Lopes, A. G.
    Vasquez, V. Z. C.
    Castro Filho, A. A. D.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B334 - B334
  • [33] Effect of Ozone Application on the Resin-dentin Microtensile Bond Strength
    Rodrigues, P. C. F.
    Souza, J. B.
    Soares, C. J.
    Lopes, L. G.
    Estrela, C.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 36 (05) : 537 - 544
  • [34] Fracture resistance and microtensile bond strength of maxillary premolars restored with two resin composite inlay systems
    Sun, Ya-Shou
    Chen, Ya-Ming
    Smales, Roger J.
    Yip, Kevin H-K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 21 (02): : 97 - 100
  • [35] Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a Feldspathic Ceramic
    Akyil, Musa Samil
    Yilmaz, Asude
    Bayindir, Funda
    Duymus, Zeynep Yesil
    PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2011, 29 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [36] The repair bond strength to resin matrix in cured resin composites after water aging
    Alqarni, Dhaifallah
    Nakajima, Masatoshi
    Hosaka, Keiichi
    Ide, Kurumi
    Nagano, Daiki
    Wada, Takehiro
    Ikeda, Masaomi
    Mamanee, Teerapong
    Thanatvarakorn, Ornnicha
    Prasansuttiporn, Taweesak
    Foxton, Richard
    Tagami, Junji
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [37] Repair bond strength of resin composite with experimental primers - effect of formulation variables
    Valente, Lisia Lorea
    Manso, Isabella Schonhofen
    Munchow, Eliseu Aldrighi
    de Moraes, Rafael Ratto
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (07) : 806 - 815
  • [38] Effect of Argon Plasma Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of Resin Composite Repair
    Ayres, A. P. A.
    Hirata, R.
    Fronza, B. M.
    Lopes, B. B.
    Ambrosano, G. M. B.
    Giannini, M.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 44 (02) : E75 - E82
  • [39] Scoping review: Effect of surface treatments on bond strength of resin composite repair
    Neto, Hermano Nobrega Macedo
    Leite, Juan Vitor Costa
    de Medeiros, Jamyle Moura
    Campos, Debora e Silva
    Muniz, Isis de Araujo Ferreira
    De Andrade, Ana Karina Maciel
    Duarte, Rosangela Marques
    De Souza, Grace Mendonca
    Lima, Renally Bezerra Wanderley
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [40] Effect Aging Conditions on the Repair Bond Strength of a Microhybrid and a Nanohybrid Resin Composite
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Cura, Cenk
    Brendeke, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 12 (06): : 451 - 459