Optimization model for bus priority control considering carbon emissions

被引:5
|
作者
Hu, Xinghua [1 ]
Chen, Xinghui [1 ]
Guo, Jianpu [2 ]
Dai, Gao [3 ]
Long, Bing [4 ]
Chen, Xiaoyan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Prod Council, Dept Sci & Technol Stat & Innovat Dev, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Ulit Sci & Technol Co Ltd, Technol R&D Dept, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Transport Planning Inst, Inst Traff Engn, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Inst Strateg Planning, Inst Transportat Dev Strategy & Planning Sichuan P, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Inst Transportat Dev Strategy & Planning, Chongqing, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1080/10962247.2023.2194863
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two bus signal priority control strategies - green extension and red truncation - were studied.Carbon emission and delay calculation methods under the bus priority control were developed.Considering carbon-emission reductions of buses and social vehicles with different fuel types under different working conditions.Three control methods were studied: guidance acceleration, guidance acceleration and green extension, and guidance deceleration and red truncation. To study the impact of bus priority control (BPC) on traffic carbon emissions under the strategies of speed guidance, green extension (GE), and red truncation (RT), with consideration of the main influencing factors such as delay, stopping times, and speed, a combination optimization method was used to develop a bi-level optimization model for BPC. The optimal carbon-emission reductions of buses and social vehicles with different fuel types in the upstream section of the intersection and the intersection control area was the upper-level objective, and the optimal total passenger-delay reduction was the lower-level objective. The Gauss - Seidel iterative algorithm was used to solve the model. Finally, the model was applied to the analysis of calculation cases. The results indicated that after BPC was adopted under the guidance acceleration strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 38 km/h, i.e. 12.67% and 21.05%, respectively. Under the guidance acceleration and GE strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 39 km/h and the GE was 6 s, i.e. 27.49% and 38.62%, respectively. Under the guidance deceleration and RT strategy, the reductions in the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger were optimal when the guidance speed was 29 km/h and the RT was 6 s, i.e. 22.18% and 33.52%, respectively. The model reduced the carbon emissions and total delay of passenger in the upstream section of the intersection and the intersection control area to achieve the optimal overall traffic benefit for the intersection.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 489
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization model for bus priority control considering carbon emissions under non-bus lane conditions
    Hu, Xinghua
    Chen, Xinghui
    Guo, Jianpu
    Dai, Gao
    Zhao, Jiahao
    Long, Bing
    Zhang, Tingting
    Chen, Shanzhi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 402
  • [2] Study of logistics network optimization model considering carbon emissions
    Ye Y.
    Wang J.
    Ye, Yong (yeyong@ahau.edu.cn), 1600, Springer (08): : 1102 - 1108
  • [3] Optimization Model of Transit Signal Priority Control for Intersection and Downstream Bus Stop
    Li, Rui
    Zheng, Changjiang
    Li, Wenquan
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [4] Model and algorithm for pharmaceutical distribution routing problem considering customer priority and carbon emissions
    Li, Jiawei
    Peng, Kunkun
    Deng, Xudong
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Ao
    DATA-CENTRIC ENGINEERING, 2024, 5
  • [5] Signal Timing Optimization Model Based on Bus Priority
    Sun, Xu
    Lin, Kun
    Jiao, Pengpeng
    Lu, Huapu
    INFORMATION, 2020, 11 (06)
  • [6] Lane-based optimization model of passive bus priority control for isolated intersection
    Ma, Wan-Jing
    Yang, Xiao-Guang
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23 (05): : 96 - 101
  • [7] A Real-Time Transit Signal Priority Control Model Considering Stochastic Bus Arrival Time
    Zeng, Xiaosi
    Zhang, Yunlong
    Balke, Kevin N.
    Yin, Kai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 15 (04) : 1657 - 1666
  • [8] Bus Priority Strategy Considering Signal Compensation for Non-bus Priority Phase
    Jin, Jing
    Sun, Yujie
    Zhen, Jinquan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 31ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2019), 2019, : 4798 - 4803
  • [9] Low-carbon school bus routing optimization model considering vehicle detour
    Zhao X.
    Chu W.
    Ren G.
    Shen K.
    Sun J.
    Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 54 (01): : 192 - 199
  • [10] Bus Priority Signal Control Considering Delays of Passengers and Pedestrians of Adjacent Intersections
    Li, Jiali
    Liu, Yugang
    Yang, Hongtai
    Chen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 2020