Clinical outcomes in eyes with diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lenses enhanced for near vision: comparison with trifocal intraocular lenses

被引:0
|
作者
Nomura, Yuya [1 ]
Ota, Yuka [2 ]
Fujita, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Nishimura, Tomohisa [3 ]
Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko [2 ]
Minami, Keiichiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Fujita Eye Clin, Tokushima, Japan
[2] Tokyo Dent Coll, Suidobashi Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Mikawa Eye Clin, Saga, Japan
关键词
Continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lens; Trifocal intraocular lens; Binocular visual acuity; Binocular contrast sensitivity; Intermediate distance; Pelli-Robson chart; VISUAL OUTCOMES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-023-03207-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background To prospectively evaluate visual functions and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lens (CDF IOL) compared with trifocal IOLs.Methods This investigator-initiated study was approved by a certified local review board (registered: jRCTs032210305). CDF IOL (Synergy, J&J, group S) and trifocal IOL (AcrySof PanOptix, Alcon, group P) were implanted bilaterally in 30 patients each. Three months postoperatively, binocular outcomes of uncorrected (BUCVA) and distance-corrected (BDCVA) visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 5 m were measured. Contrast sensitivities were binocularly measured using CSV-1000 (2.5 m) and Pelli-Robson charts at distances of 0.4 and 1 m. Symptoms of glare, halo, starburst, and waxy vision, and satisfaction for near, intermediate, and far visions were assessed with questionnaires. Differences between the two groups were examined.Results Twenty-seven patients each completed the follow-up. The mean age of the group S was lower than that of the group P (P < 0.001). The BUCVA at 0.4 m was better in the S group, while the mean manifest refraction of the P group showed a significant hyperopic shift (P < 0.001). BDCVA was significantly better in the S group. The contrast sensitivity results at three distances showed no discernible differences. Although more patients in the S group reported significant glare and halo, their satisfaction with near vision was higher.Conclusions The binocular visual function of patients with CDF IOLs was comparable to or better than that of patients with trifocal IOLs. The patients were satisfied with near vision, despite the enhanced glare and halo. Understanding the differences between the two types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs is important to ensure patient satisfaction.Trial registrationThis clinical trial was registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032210305) on September 13, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update
    Megiddo-Barnir, Elinor
    Alio, Jorge L.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 12 (01): : 58 - 79
  • [32] Measuring aberrations of multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses
    Del Aguila-Carrasco, Antonio J.
    Papadatou, Eleni
    Buckhurst, Phillip J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (10): : 1516 - 1517
  • [33] Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
    Bellucci, Carlo
    Mora, Paolo
    Tedesco, Salvatore Antonio
    Gandolfi, Stefano
    Bellucci, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 40 (09)
  • [34] Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Rodov, Luba
    Reitblat, Olga
    Levy, Adi
    Assia, Ehud, I
    Kleinmann, Guy
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07) : 434 - +
  • [35] Impact of Lens Material on Objective Refraction in Eyes with Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
    Garzon, Nuria
    Poyales, Francisco
    Garcia-Montero, Maria
    Vega, Fidel
    Millan, Maria Sagrario
    Albarran-Diego, Cesar
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2022, 47 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [36] Postoperative Visual Function of Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Versus Monofocal Lenses
    Komatsu, Koji
    Masuda, Yoichiro
    Tachibana, Sei
    Sano, Kei
    Iida, Masanobu
    Ichihara, Kosuke
    Oki, Tetutaro
    Fukai, Kota
    Tatemichi, Masayuki
    Nakano, Tadashi
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 40 (07) : E499 - +
  • [37] COMPARISON OF THE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF BIFOCAL, TRIFOCAL AND EXTENDED-DEPTH OF FOCUS INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    Attia, Mary
    Khoramnia, Ramin
    Rabsilber, Tanja
    Holzer, Mike P.
    Auffarth, Gerd U.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 45 : 46 - 46
  • [38] Clinical outcome comparison: bilateral trifocal vs. mix–match extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses
    Banu Acar
    Burcu Nurozler Tabakci
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 3675 - 3686
  • [39] Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses
    Carlos Palomino-Bautista
    Rubén Sánchez-Jean
    David Carmona-González
    David P. Piñero
    Ainhoa Molina-Martín
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 351 - 359
  • [40] Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko
    Ota, Yuka
    Taira, Yoko
    Takemura, Ryo
    Minami, Keiichiro
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (06) : 3099 - 3108