The influence of birth outcomes and pregnancy complications on interpregnancy interval: a quantile regression analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gebremedhin, Amanuel T. [1 ,5 ]
Regan, Annette K. [1 ,2 ]
Haberg, Siri E. [4 ]
Marinovich, M. Luke [1 ]
Tessema, Gizachew A. [1 ]
Pereira, Gavin [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Curtin Univ, enAble Inst, Kent St, Bentley, WA, Australia
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Fertil & Hlth CeFH, Oslo, Norway
[5] Curtin Univ, Curtin Sch Populat Hlth, GPOB U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Quantile regression; Interpregnancy interval; Birth intervals; Birth spacing; Pregnancy complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.05.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: To ascertain whether adverse pregnancy outcomes at first pregnancy influence subsequent interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and whether the size of this effect varies with IPI distributionMethods: We included 251,892 mothers who gave birth to their first two singletons in Western Australia, from 1980 to 2015. Using quantile regression, we investigated whether gestational diabetes, hypertension, or preeclampsia in the first pregnancy influenced IPI to subsequent pregnancy and whether effects were consistent across the IPI distribution. We considered intervals at the 25th centile of the distribution as 'short' and the 75th centile as 'long'.Results: The average IPI was 26.6 mo. It was 0.56 mo (95% CI: 0.25-0.88 mo) and 1.12 mo (95% CI: 0.56 - 1.68 mo) longer after preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension respectively. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that the association between previous pregnancy complications and IPI differed by the extent of the interval. However, associations with marital status, race/ethnicity and stillbirth contributed to either shortening or prolonging IPIs differently across the distribution of IPI.Conclusion: Mothers with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension had slightly longer subsequent IPIs than mothers whose pregnancies were not complicated by these conditions. However, the extent of the delay was small (< 2 mo).(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome-Analysis on US Birth Data.
    Graf, Vanessa
    Haleem, Khadija
    McClelland, W. Spencer
    Cheon, Teresa
    Benedetto, M. Teresa
    Anzai, Yuzuru
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : 204A - 204A
  • [22] Effects of interpregnancy interval on pregnancy complications: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gebremedhin, Amanuel Tesfay
    Regan, Annette K.
    Malacova, Eva
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Ball, Stephen
    Foo, Damien
    Pereira, Gavin
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [23] Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after recurrent pregnancy loss
    Bentolila, Yaara
    Ratzon, Ronit
    Shoham-Vardi, Ilana
    Serjienko, Ruslan
    Mazor, Moshe
    Bashiri, Asher
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (14): : 1459 - 1464
  • [24] BIRTH-ORDER, INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL AND BIRTH OUTCOMES AMONG FILIPINO INFANTS
    MILLER, JE
    JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 1994, 26 (02) : 243 - 259
  • [25] Interpregnancy interval and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after dilation and evacuation
    Kuwahara, Melissa
    Yamasato, Kelly
    Tschann, Mary
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (04) : 516 - 520
  • [26] Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Yumei
    Zeng, Can
    Chen, Yuhong
    Yang, Liu
    Tian, Di
    Liu, Xinghui
    Lin, Yonghong
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [27] Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh
    DaVanzo, J.
    Hale, L.
    Razzaque, A.
    Rahmand, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (09) : 1079 - 1087
  • [28] Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes: A Propensity Matching Study in the California Population
    Congdon, Jayme L.
    Baer, Rebecca J.
    Arcara, Jennet
    Feuer, Sky K.
    Gomez, Anu Manchikanti
    Karasek, Deborah
    Oltman, Scott P.
    Pantell, Matthew S.
    Ryckman, Kelli
    Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Laura
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 26 (05) : 1115 - 1125
  • [29] Interpregnancy Interval and Singleton Live Birth Outcomes From In Vitro Fertilization
    Quinn, Molly M.
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    Huddleston, Heather G.
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01): : 115 - 121
  • [30] Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes: A Propensity Matching Study in the California Population
    Jayme L. Congdon
    Rebecca J. Baer
    Jennet Arcara
    Sky K. Feuer
    Anu Manchikanti Gómez
    Deborah Karasek
    Scott P. Oltman
    Matthew S. Pantell
    Kelli Ryckman
    Laura Jelliffe-Pawlowski
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2022, 26 (5) : 1115 - 1125