Optimization of transonic low-Reynolds number airfoil based on genetic algorithm

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Zhaolin [1 ,3 ]
Wei, Xiaohui [1 ]
Xiao, Tianhang [1 ]
Qin, Ning [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, State Key Lab Mech & Control Mech Struct, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Sheffield, England
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, State Key Lab Mech & Control Mech Struct, 29 YuDao St, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Low Reynolds number; laminar separation bubble; Mar's rotor; airfoil optimization; shock separation interaction; BEZIER-PARSEC; SHAPE; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/09544100231207558
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A 2-D airfoil shape optimization in transonic low-Reynolds number regime is conducted. A Navier-Stokes flow solver with a transition model (k-omega SST gamma-Re-theta) is used to evaluate the fitness function. Single-point and multi-point formulations of the optimization results are compared. In addition, the effects of Mach number and angles of attack on aerodynamic characteristics of the optimized airfoils are investigated under low Reynolds number (Re = 17,000) and high-subsonic-flow (M-a,M-infinity=0.6-0.9) conditions. The results show that the corresponding drag divergence Mach number curves of the conventional airfoil present almost a parallel shifting at the entire Mach number range. By contrast, the unconventional airfoil starts showing a significant drag reduction when Mach number is greater than 0.75. Besides, the maximum lift-to-drag ratio is highly influenced by the Mach number because of the formation, movement, type, and strength of a shock wave. In addition, the distinguishing difference in the conclusion between two airfoils is that the lift fluctuation of the conventional airfoil amplifies with the increase of the Mach number. However, the unconventional airfoil shows an opposite trend.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 60
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Design of flapping airfoil for optimal aerodynamic performance in low-Reynolds number flows
    Lee, Jung-Sang
    Kim, Chongam
    Kim, Kyu Hong
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (09) : 1960 - 1972
  • [12] Design of flapping airfoil for optimal aerodynamic performance in low-Reynolds number flows
    Lee, Jung-Sang
    Kim, Chongam
    Kim, Kyu Hong
    AIAA Journal, 2006, 44 (09): : 1960 - 1972
  • [13] Computations of unsteady transonic flow over airfoil at low Reynolds number
    ZHU HaitaoSHAN PengSchool of Energy and Power EngineeringBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijing China
    航空动力学报, 2013, 28 (03) : 646 - 658
  • [14] Transonic Buffet in Flow Past a Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoil
    Jia, Boyang
    Li, Weipeng
    Bae, H. Jane
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2024, 37 (06)
  • [15] Computations of unsteady transonic flow over airfoil at low Reynolds number
    Zhu, H.-T. (zht83@126.com), 1600, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (BUAA) (28):
  • [16] Optimization of a low Reynolds number airfoil with flexible membrane
    Levin, O
    Shyy, W
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2001, 2 (04): : 523 - 536
  • [17] RANS analysis of the low-Reynolds number flow around the SD7003 airfoil
    Catalano, P.
    Tognaccini, R.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 15 (08) : 615 - 626
  • [18] Two-dimensional low-Reynolds number wind tunnel results for airfoil NACA 0018
    Timmer, W.
    WIND ENGINEERING, 2008, 32 (06) : 525 - 537
  • [19] Computation vs. Experiment for High-Frequency Low-Reynolds Number Airfoil Plunge
    Ol, Michael V.
    Reeder, Mark
    Fredberg, Daniel
    McGowan, Gregory Z.
    Gopalarathnam, Ashok
    Edwards, Jack R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MICRO AIR VEHICLES, 2009, 1 (02) : 99 - 119
  • [20] Line fountain behavior at low-Reynolds number
    Srinarayana, N.
    Williamson, N.
    Armfield, S. W.
    Lin, Wenxian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2010, 53 (9-10) : 2065 - 2073