Life cycle assessment of gas-based EAF steel production: environmental impacts and strategies for footprint reduction

被引:3
|
作者
Moziraji, Maziar Ramezani [1 ]
Dezvareh, Ghorban Ali [2 ]
Ehteshami, Majid [1 ]
Sabour, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
Bazargan, Alireza [3 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Semnan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Semnan, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Environm, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Steel production; SimaPro; OpenLCA; Direct reduction iron; Electric arc furnace; Environmental assessment; CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION; AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES; IRON; TECHNOLOGIES; EFFICIENT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02230-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeDespite its sizeable role in the global economy, the steel industry is also one of the world's largest energy consumers and a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. Iran is one of the world's top ten steel producers, with over 77% of its steel produced in electric arc furnaces (EAF). As a result, a thorough impact assessment is essential to understand the possible negative environmental impacts. The purpose of this study is to perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) on gas-based direct-reduction-iron-EAF steel production in Iran.MethodsThe environmental impacts of steel production were evaluated in this study. The most influential processes and inputs were determined by analyzing their contributions separately. Due to the fact that the inputs of the EAF process can vary based on the context and availability of resources, multiple scenarios were defined, and the results were compared. SimaPro and OpenLCA software, the Ecoinvent database, and the IMPACT2002+evaluation method were used in this study. The data for the life cycle inventory was derived from the average performance of factories over a one-year period, with 1 ton of hot-rolled steel serving as the functional unit.ResultsThe findings indicated that among the various categories, non-renewable energy, global warming, and respiratory inorganics have the greatest impact, accounting for 86.4% of the total. The most significant environmental impacts of processes are associated with the EAF (35%), direct reduction iron (DRI), and oxide pellet processes (28.9% and 17.1%, respectively), while the most significant environmental impacts of inputs are associated with electricity (33.8%) and gas consumption (25.8%). Sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the significance of the inputs. Given that the EAF process's primary inputs are scrap iron, two scenarios involving coal-based and gas-based sponge iron were defined, and the impact of each scenario was evaluated.ConclusionSuggestions for sustainable production were made based on the assessment of the results. The low price of natural gas and abundance of iron ore in Iran make the production of gas-based steel with sponge iron more appealing. Additionally, it was shown that using sponge iron in the coal-based process results in high environmental impacts compared to other scenarios (gas-based systems) which can have a significant impact on global warming. This is particularly important because coal-based processes are widely used in India and China due to abundant coal resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1621
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental impacts of solar grade polysilicon based on life cycle assessment
    Xie, Minghui
    Ruan, Jiuli
    Bai, Lu
    Qiao, Qi
    Liu, Xiuqiong
    Yang, Deren
    Yang, Lifei
    2015, 28 (02): : 291 - 296
  • [32] Hemp Seed Production: Environmental Impacts ofCannabis sativaL. Agronomic Practices by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Carbon Footprint Methodologies
    Campiglia, Enio
    Gobbi, Laura
    Marucci, Alvaro
    Rapa, Mattia
    Ruggieri, Roberto
    Vinci, Giuliana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of carbon footprint in dual-phase automotive strip steel production
    Fang X.
    Sun W.
    Li W.
    Ma G.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (17) : 26300 - 26314
  • [34] Life cycle assessment and water footprint evaluation of crude steel production: A case study in China
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Ye, Liping
    Qi, Congcong
    Yang, Donglu
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 224 : 10 - 18
  • [35] Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Luo, Jiafa
    Guo, Yongqin
    Zhao, Zhanqin
    Guo, Liang
    Liu, Song
    Zhang, Nannan
    Duan, Xueqin
    Ma, Lin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 486 - 495
  • [36] Assessing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional mixed vegetable production based on the life cycle assessment approach
    Temizyurek-Arslan, Merve
    Karacetin, Evrim
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 18 (06) : 1733 - 1746
  • [37] Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint
    Rafiee M.
    Abbaspour-Fard M.H.
    Heidari A.
    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2024, 34 (46949-46964): : 46949 - 46964
  • [38] Environmental impacts of steel ship hulls building and recycling by life cycle assessment (LCA)
    Onal, Mehmet
    Neser, Gokdeniz
    Gursel, K. Turgut
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2021, 16 (10) : 1061 - 1066
  • [39] Identifying environmental hotspots and improvement strategies of vanillin production with life cycle assessment
    Zhao, Xinyue
    Zhang, Yuting
    Cheng, Yi
    Sun, Hongliang
    Bai, Shunwen
    Li, Chunyan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 769
  • [40] Towards environmental sustainability: Life cycle assessment-based water footprint analysis on China's cotton production
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Zhai, Yijie
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Bai, Yueyang
    Zhang, Ruirui
    Ji, Changxing
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313