Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study

被引:1
|
作者
You, Xiaolin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanyun [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ,2 ]
Min, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Kana [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Na [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, West China Univ Hosp 2, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, West China Univ Hosp 2, Minist Educ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Ctr Translat Med, Lab Mol & Translat Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; multi-port laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; sing-port laparoscopy; endometrial cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PORT LAPAROSCOPY; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; HERNIA; LESS; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS).Materials and methods This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching.Results A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875).Conclusion TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE SURGERY FOR RENAL CANCER
    Laydner, Humberto Kern
    Autorino, Riccardo
    White, Michael A.
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Spana, Gregory
    Isac, Wahib
    Altunrende, Fatih
    Yang, Bo
    Hillyer, Shahab
    Guillotreau, Julien
    Yakoubi, Rachid
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A234 - A235
  • [32] Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients
    Tokuoka, Masayoshi
    Ide, Yoshihito
    Takeda, Mitsunobu
    Hirose, Hajime
    Hashimoto, Yasuji
    Matsuyama, Jin
    Yokoyama, Shigekazu
    Fukushima, Yukio
    Sasaki, Yo
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1465 - 1470
  • [33] Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study
    Cho, Yeon Jean
    Kim, Mi-La
    Lee, Soo Yoon
    Lee, Hee Suk
    Kim, Joo Myoung
    Joo, Kwan Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 4 : 85 - 91
  • [34] Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
    Wang Si-Yun
    Yin Ling
    Guan Xiao-Ming
    Xiao Bing-Bing
    Zhang Yan
    Amanda Delgado
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (11) : 1305 - 1310
  • [35] LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE SURGERY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC VARICOCELE LIGATION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY
    Ha, U. S.
    Kim, S. H.
    Koh, J. S.
    Cho, Y. H.
    Lee, S. W.
    Moon, H. S.
    Yu, J. H.
    Han, J. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 221 - 222
  • [36] Re: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Surgical Port Performance in a Surgical Simulator With Novices Editorial Comment
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03): : 929 - 929
  • [37] Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer
    Bae, Sung
    Jegon, Woon
    Baek, Seong Kyu
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2022, 17 (01) : 179 - 187
  • [38] Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
    Wang, Si-Yun
    Yin, Ling
    Guan, Xiao-Ming
    Xiao, Bing-Bing
    Zhang, Yan
    Delgado, Amanda
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (11) : 1305 - 1310
  • [39] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Standard Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem
    Mutlu, Bircan
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (08) : 1315 - 1320
  • [40] Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery and transumbilical single port laparoscopy surgery for endometrial cancer
    He, Guna
    Liu, Lingyu
    Liu, Xiaomei
    Guo, Hui
    Chen, Lingling
    Li, Rongzi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (04): : 2647 - 2654