Predictions of solar activity cycles 25 and 26 using non-linear autoregressive exogenous neural networks

被引:5
|
作者
Kalkan, Mirkan Y. [1 ]
Fawzy, Diaa E. [2 ]
Saygac, A. Talat [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Inst Grad Studies Sci, TR-34134 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Izmir Univ Econ, Fac Engn, TR-35330 Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Astron & Space Sci, TR-34134 Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Univ Observ Applicat, Res Ctr, TR-34134 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
software: data analysis; Sun: activity; Sun: general; Sun: heliosphere; solar-terrestrial relations; sunspots; SUNSPOT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stad1460
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
This study presents new prediction models of the 11-yr solar activity cycles (SC) 25 and 26 based on multiple activity indicator parameters. The developed models are based on the use of non-linear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) neural network approach. The training period of the NARX model is from July 1749 to December 2019. The considered activity indicator parameters are the monthly sunspot number time series (SSN), the flare occurence frequency, the 10.7-cm solar radio flux, and the total solar irradiance (TSI). The neural network models are fed by these parameters independently and the prediction results are compared and verified. The obtained training, validation, and prediction results show that our models are accurate with an accuracy of about 90 per cent in the prediction of peak activity values. The current models produce the dual-peak maximum (Gnevyshev gap) very well. Based on the obtained results, the expected solar peaks in terms of SSN (monthly averaged smoothed) of the solar cycles 25 and 26 are R-SSN = 116.6 (February 2025) and R-SSN = 113.25 (October 2036), respectively. The expected time durations of SC 25 and SC 26 cycles are 9.2 and 11 yr, respectively. The activity levels of SC 25 and 26 are expected to be very close and similar to or weaker than SC 24. This suggests that these two cycles are at the minimum level of the Gleissberg cycle. A comparison with other reported studies shows that our results based on the NARX model are in good agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1181
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-linear filtering of ultrasonic signals using neural networks
    Vicen, R
    Gil, R
    Jarabo, P
    Rosa, M
    López, F
    Martínez, D
    ULTRASONICS, 2004, 42 (1-9) : 355 - 360
  • [22] Modelling of non-linear dynamic systems by using neural networks
    Horvath, G
    Dunay, R
    ISIE'96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 92 - 97
  • [23] Predictive control for non-linear systems using neural networks
    Liu, GP
    Kadirkamanathan, V
    Billings, SA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1998, 71 (06) : 1119 - 1132
  • [24] Modelling non-linear time series using neural networks
    Zorin, A
    SIMPLICITY BEHIND COMPLEXITY, 2004, 3 : 269 - 275
  • [25] Non-linear system modeling using LSTM neural networks
    Gonzalez, Jesus
    Yu, Wen
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (13): : 485 - 489
  • [26] Forecasting reliability using non-linear autoregressive external input (NARX) neural network
    C. Riverol
    N. Hosein
    A. Singh
    Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 2019, 8 (2) : 165 - 174
  • [27] Prediction of solar cycle 25: a non-linear approach
    Sarp, V.
    Kilcik, A.
    Yurchyshyn, V.
    Rozelot, J. P.
    Ozguc, A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 481 (03) : 2981 - 2985
  • [28] Non-linear modelling and chaotic neural networks
    Jones, AJ
    Margetts, S
    Durrant, P
    Tsui, APM
    SIXTH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 7 - 14
  • [29] NON-LINEAR NEURAL NETWORKS WITH EXTERNAL NOISE
    VANHEMMEN, JL
    RZAZEWSKI, K
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1987, 20 (18): : 6553 - 6560
  • [30] Forecasting of municipal solid waste generation using non-linear autoregressive (NAR) neural models
    Sunayan
    Kumar, Sunil
    Kumar, Rakesh
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 121 (121) : 206 - 214