Application of Constitutive Models and Machine Learning Models to Predict the Elevated Temperature Flow Behavior of TiAl Alloy

被引:2
|
作者
Zhao, Rui [1 ]
He, Jianchao [1 ]
Tian, Hao [2 ]
Jing, Yongjuan [3 ,4 ]
Xiong, Jie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Inst Special Environm Phys Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] AVIC Beijing Aeronaut Mfg Technol Res Inst, Beijing 100024, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Inst Technol, State Key Lab Adv Welding & Joining, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TiAl alloy; hot-deformation behavior; data-driven model; generalization capability; HOT DEFORMATION-BEHAVIOR; MODIFIED ZERILLI-ARMSTRONG; MODIFIED JOHNSON-COOK; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DEFORMABILITY; PHASE; MAP; NB;
D O I
10.3390/ma16144987
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The hot deformation behaviors of a Ti46Al2Cr2Nb alloy were investigated at strain rates of 0.001-0.1 s-1 and temperatures of 910-1060 & DEG;C. Under given deformation conditions, the activation energy of the TiAl alloy could be estimated as 319 kJ/mol. The experimental results were predicted by different predictive models including three constitutive models and three data-driven models. The most accurate data-driven model and constitutive model were an artificial neural network (ANN) and an Arrhenius type strain-compensated Sellars (SCS) model, respectively. In addition, the generalization capability of ANN model and SCS model was examined under different deformation conditions. Under known deformation conditions, the ANN model could accurately predict the flow stress of TiAl alloys at interpolated and extrapolated strains with a coefficient of determination (R2) greater than 0.98, while the R2 value of the SCS model was smaller than 0.5 at extrapolated strains. However, both ANN and SCS models performed poorly under new deformation conditions. A hybrid model based on the SCS model and ANN predictions was shown to have a wider generalization capability. The present work provides a comprehensive study on how to choose a predictive model for the flow stress of TiAl alloys under different conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning models to predict the tunnel wall convergence
    Zhou, Jian
    Chen, Yuxin
    Li, Chuanqi
    Qiu, Yingui
    Huang, Shuai
    Tao, Ming
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2023, 41
  • [42] Machine Learning Models To Predict Length Of Stay In Hospitals
    Jain, Raunak
    Singh, Mrityunjai
    Rao, A. Ravishankar
    Garg, Rahul
    2022 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS (ICHI 2022), 2022, : 545 - 546
  • [43] Machine Learning Models to Predict Google Stock Prices
    Bucura, Cosmina Elena
    Giudici, Paolo
    ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [44] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Young, Roger C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (01): : 194 - 195
  • [45] Machine Learning and Statistical Models to Predict Postpartum Hemorrhage
    Venkatesh, Kartik K.
    Strauss, Robert A.
    Grotegut, Chad A.
    Heine, R. Philip
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Menard, Katherine M.
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (04): : 935 - 944
  • [46] Benchmarking machine learning models to predict corporate bankruptcy
    Alanis, Emmanuel
    Chava, Sudheer
    Shah, Agam
    JOURNAL OF CREDIT RISK, 2023, 19 (02): : 77 - 110
  • [47] Hypocalcemia and Machine Learning Models to Predict Trauma Mortality
    Limon, David
    Moreira, Alvaro
    Myers, John C.
    Jenkins, Donald H.
    Braverman, Maxwell
    Barry, Lauran A.
    Lumbard, Derek C.
    Smith, Alison
    Nicholson, Susannah E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S550 - S550
  • [48] Machine learning models predict selinexor tolerability and efficacy
    Artstein, Y.
    Walker, C.
    Yang, F.
    Van Domelen, D.
    Borochov, D.
    Mercier, I.
    Shah, J.
    Shacham, S.
    Landesman, Y.
    Tang, S.
    Shacham, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S277 - S277
  • [49] Different Machine Learning Models to predict dropouts in MOOCs
    Kashyap, Avinash
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2018, : 80 - 85
  • [50] Machine Learning Models to Predict Multiclass Protein Classifications
    Parikh, Yash
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    2019 IEEE 10TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2019, : 300 - 304