High rate of clinically relevant improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis

被引:0
|
作者
Nyring, Marc Randall Kristensen [1 ,2 ]
Olsen, Bo Sanderhoff [1 ]
Amundsen, Alexander [1 ]
Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard [1 ]
机构
[1] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sect Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 12 Gentofte Hospitalsvej, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference; Patient reported outcome measures; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty; Clinically relevant improvement; WESTERN ONTARIO OSTEOARTHRITIS; SCORE; WOOS; DEGENERATION; INDEX; CUFF;
D O I
10.5312/wjo.v15.i2.156
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is defined as the smallest meaningful change in a health domain that a patient would identify as important. Thus, an improvement that exceeds the MCID can be used to define a successful treatment for the individual patient. AIM To quantify the rate of clinical improvement following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS Patients were treated with the Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty between March 2017 and February 2019 at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). The rate of clinically relevant improvement was defined as the proportion of patients who had an improvement 24 months postoperatively that exceeded the MCID. Based on previous literature, MCID for WOOS, OSS, and CMS were defined as 12.3, 4.3, and 12.8 respectively. RESULTS Forty-nine patients with a Global Unite total shoulder platform arthroplasty were included for the final analysis. Mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range 49.0-79.0, SD: 8.3) and 65% were women. One patient was revised within the two years follow-up. The mean improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up was 46.1 points [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 39.7-53.3, P < 0.005] for WOOS, 18.2 points (95%CI: 15.5-21.0, P < 0.005) for OSS and 37.8 points (95%CI: 31.5-44.0, P < 0.005) for CMS. Two years postoperatively, 41 patients (87%) had an improvement in WOOS that exceeded the MCID, 45 patients (94%) had an improvement in OSS that exceeded the MCID, and 42 patients (88%) had an improvement in CMS that exceeded the MCID. CONCLUSION Based on three shoulder-specific outcome measures we find that approximately 90% of patients has a clinically relevant improvement. This is a clear message when informing patients about their prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty: A finite element investigation
    Hopkins, Andrew R.
    Hansen, Ulrich N.
    Amis, Andrew A.
    Taylor, Mark
    Emery, Roger J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2007, 25 (01) : 108 - 115
  • [12] A nationwide analysis on the effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following primary total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis
    Amirian, Brandon
    Akhnoukh, Kyrillos M.
    Ashraf, Asad M.
    Swiggett, Samuel J.
    Rosato, Francis E.
    Vakharia, Rushabh M.
    Sadeghpour, Ramin
    Razi, Afshin E.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2022, 14 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [13] Characterizing the functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis
    Fehringer, EV
    Kopjar, B
    Boorman, RS
    Churchill, RS
    Smith, KL
    Matsen, FA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (08): : 1349 - 1353
  • [14] Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder replacement in glenohumeral osteoarthritis?
    Rickert, M.
    Loew, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2007, 36 (11): : 1013 - 1016
  • [15] Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses
    Vij Jr, Neeraj
    Tummala, Sailesh
    Shahriary, Eahsan
    Tokish, John
    Martin, Shelden
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [16] Return to Work after Shoulder Replacement for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis is Similar when Hemiarthroplasty is Compared to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Garcia, Grant H.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Mahony, Gregory
    Sinatro, Alec
    Wu, Hao Hua
    Dines, David M.
    Warren, Russell F.
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    HSS JOURNAL, 2020, 16 (03) : 212 - 217
  • [17] Anatomical total shoulder replacement in glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Indications, current implants, and clinical results
    Lorbach, O.
    ORTHOPADE, 2018, 47 (05): : 383 - 389
  • [18] A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis:: Results of a multicenter study
    Edwards, TB
    Kadakia, NR
    Boulahia, A
    Kempf, JF
    Boileau, P
    Némoz, C
    Walch, G
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2003, 12 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [19] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with preservation of the rotator cuff for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis has similar outcomes to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff arthropathy
    Nazzal, Ehab M.
    Reddy, Rajiv P.
    Como, Matthew
    Rai, Ajinkya
    Greiner, Justin J.
    Fox, Michael A.
    Lin, Albert
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (06) : S60 - S68
  • [20] Anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis
    Atwan, Yousif
    Walton, Michael J.
    Watts, Adam C.
    Trail, Ian A.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2025,