GRB optical and X-ray plateau properties classifier using unsupervised machine learning

被引:5
|
作者
Bhardwaj, Shubham [1 ,2 ]
Dainotti, Maria G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Venkatesh, Sachin [4 ]
Narendra, Aditya [5 ,6 ]
Kalsi, Anish [7 ]
Rinaldi, Enrico [8 ]
Pollo, Agnieszka [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Astron Observ Japan, 2 Chome 21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
[2] Grad Univ Adv Studies, Dept Astron Sci, SOKENDAI, Miura Dist, Kanagawa 2400193, Japan
[3] Space Sci Inst, 4765 Walnut St Ste B, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Phys, North Ave, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] Jagiellonian Univ, Astron Observ, Orla 171, PL-30244 Krakow, Poland
[6] Jagiellonian Univ, Doctoral Sch Exact & Nat Sci, PL-30348 Krakow, Poland
[7] Delhi Technol Univ, New Delhi 110042, India
[8] RIKEN, Interdisciplinary Theoret & Math Sci Program, iTHEMS, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 3510198, Japan
[9] Natl Ctr Nucl Res, PL-02093 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
methods: statistical; (transients:) gamma-ray bursts; RR LYRAE STARS; NONRADIAL PULSATION; ABUNDANCES; PHOTOMETRY; OVERTONE; GAIA;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stad2593
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The division of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) into different classes, other than the 'short' and 'long', has been an active field of research. We investigate whether GRBs can be classified based on a broader set of parameters, including prompt and plateau emission ones. Observational evidence suggests the existence of more GRB subclasses, but results so far are either conflicting or not statistically significant. The novelty here is producing a machine-learning-based classification of GRBs using their observed X-rays and optical properties. We used two data samples: the first, composed of 203 GRBs, is from the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift/XRT), and the latter, composed of 134 GRBs, is from the ground-based Telescopes and Swift/UVOT. Both samples possess the plateau emission (a flat part of the light curve happening after the prompt emission, the main GRB event). We have applied the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to explore multiple parameter spaces and subclass combinations to reveal if there is a match between the current observational subclasses and the statistical classification. With these samples and the algorithm, we spot a few microtrends in certain cases, but we cannot conclude that any clear trend exists in classifying GRBs. These microtrends could point towards a deeper understanding of the physical meaning of these classes (e.g. a different environment of the same progenitor or different progenitors). However, a larger sample and different algorithms could achieve such goals. Thus, this methodology can lead to deeper insights in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:5204 / 5223
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The multiwavelength afterglow of GRB 050721: a puzzling rebrightening seen in the optical but not in the X-ray
    Antonelli, L. A.
    Testa, V.
    Romano, P.
    Guetta, D.
    Torii, K.
    D'Elia, V.
    Malesani, D.
    Chincarini, G.
    Covino, S.
    D'Avanzo, P.
    Della Valle, M.
    Fiore, F.
    Fugazza, D.
    Moretti, A.
    Stella, L.
    Tagliaferri, G.
    Barthelmy, S.
    Burrows, D.
    Campana, S.
    Capalbi, M.
    Cusumano, G.
    Gehrels, N.
    Giommi, P.
    Lazzati, D.
    La Parola, V.
    Mangano, V.
    Mineo, T.
    Nousek, J.
    O'Brien, P. T.
    Perri, M.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2006, 456 (02) : 509 - 515
  • [42] COV-ELM classifier: An extreme learning machine based identification of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images
    Rajpal, Sheetal
    Agarwal, Manoj
    Rajpal, Ankit
    Lakhyani, Navin
    Saggar, Arpita
    Kumar, Naveen
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2022, 16 (01): : 193 - 203
  • [43] Electronic structure and optical properties of silicon nanowires: A study using x-ray excited optical luminescence and x-ray emission spectroscopy
    Sham, TK
    Naftel, SJ
    Kim, PSG
    Sammynaiken, R
    Tang, YH
    Coulthard, I
    Moewes, A
    Freeland, JW
    Hu, YF
    Lee, ST
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2004, 70 (04): : 045313 - 1
  • [44] Detection of Pneumonia from Chest X-Ray images using Machine Learning
    SureshKumar, M.
    Perumal, Varalakshmi
    Yuvaraj, Gowtham
    Rajasekar, Sakthi Jaya Sundar
    CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 30 (04): : 325 - 334
  • [45] Crystal nucleation in metallic alloys using x-ray radiography and machine learning
    Liotti, Enzo
    Arteta, Carlos
    Zisserman, Andrew
    Lui, Andrew
    Lempitsky, Victor
    Grant, Patrick S.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (04):
  • [46] Artifact identification in X-ray diffraction data using machine learning methods
    Yanxon, Howard
    Weng, James
    Parraga, Hannah
    Xu, Wenqian
    Ruett, Uta
    Schwarz, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION, 2023, 30 : 137 - 146
  • [47] Deconvoluting thermomechanical effects in X-ray diffraction data using machine learning
    Lim, Rachel E.
    Shang, Shun-Li
    Chuang, Chihpin
    Phan, Thien Q.
    Liu, Zi-Kui
    Pagan, Darren C.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2025, 81 : 137 - 150
  • [48] Optimization of chest X-ray exposure factors using machine learning algorithm
    Hamd, Zuhal Y.
    Alrebdi, H. I.
    Osman, Eyas G.
    Awwad, Areej
    Alnawwaf, Layan
    Nashri, Nawal
    Alfnekh, Rema
    Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [49] Speciation of Nanocatalysts Using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Assisted by Machine Learning
    Routh, Prahlad K.
    Marcella, Nicholas
    Frenkel, Anatoly I.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2023, 127 (12): : 5653 - 5662
  • [50] Classification of Chest X-Ray Images using Wavelet and MFCC Features and Support Vector Machine Classifier
    Abu Owida, Hamza
    Al-Ghraibah, Amani
    Altayeb, Muneera
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (04) : 7296 - 7301