GRB optical and X-ray plateau properties classifier using unsupervised machine learning

被引:5
|
作者
Bhardwaj, Shubham [1 ,2 ]
Dainotti, Maria G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Venkatesh, Sachin [4 ]
Narendra, Aditya [5 ,6 ]
Kalsi, Anish [7 ]
Rinaldi, Enrico [8 ]
Pollo, Agnieszka [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Natl Astron Observ Japan, 2 Chome 21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 1818588, Japan
[2] Grad Univ Adv Studies, Dept Astron Sci, SOKENDAI, Miura Dist, Kanagawa 2400193, Japan
[3] Space Sci Inst, 4765 Walnut St Ste B, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Phys, North Ave, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] Jagiellonian Univ, Astron Observ, Orla 171, PL-30244 Krakow, Poland
[6] Jagiellonian Univ, Doctoral Sch Exact & Nat Sci, PL-30348 Krakow, Poland
[7] Delhi Technol Univ, New Delhi 110042, India
[8] RIKEN, Interdisciplinary Theoret & Math Sci Program, iTHEMS, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 3510198, Japan
[9] Natl Ctr Nucl Res, PL-02093 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
methods: statistical; (transients:) gamma-ray bursts; RR LYRAE STARS; NONRADIAL PULSATION; ABUNDANCES; PHOTOMETRY; OVERTONE; GAIA;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stad2593
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The division of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) into different classes, other than the 'short' and 'long', has been an active field of research. We investigate whether GRBs can be classified based on a broader set of parameters, including prompt and plateau emission ones. Observational evidence suggests the existence of more GRB subclasses, but results so far are either conflicting or not statistically significant. The novelty here is producing a machine-learning-based classification of GRBs using their observed X-rays and optical properties. We used two data samples: the first, composed of 203 GRBs, is from the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift/XRT), and the latter, composed of 134 GRBs, is from the ground-based Telescopes and Swift/UVOT. Both samples possess the plateau emission (a flat part of the light curve happening after the prompt emission, the main GRB event). We have applied the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to explore multiple parameter spaces and subclass combinations to reveal if there is a match between the current observational subclasses and the statistical classification. With these samples and the algorithm, we spot a few microtrends in certain cases, but we cannot conclude that any clear trend exists in classifying GRBs. These microtrends could point towards a deeper understanding of the physical meaning of these classes (e.g. a different environment of the same progenitor or different progenitors). However, a larger sample and different algorithms could achieve such goals. Thus, this methodology can lead to deeper insights in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:5204 / 5223
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unsupervised machine learning for the classification of astrophysical X-ray sources
    Samuel Perez-Diaz, Victor
    Rafael Martinez-Galarza, Juan
    Caicedo, Alexander
    D'Abrusco, Raffaele
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 528 (03) : 4852 - 4871
  • [2] AXEAP: a software package for X-ray emission data analysis using unsupervised machine learning
    Hwang, In Hui
    Solovyev, Mikhail A.
    Han, Sang Wook
    Chan, Maria K. Y.
    Hammonds, John P.
    Heald, Steve M.
    Kelly, Shelly D.
    Schwarz, Nicholas
    Zhang, Xiaoyi
    Sun, Cheng Jun
    JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION, 2022, 29 (Pt 5) : 1309 - 1317
  • [3] Unsupervised machine learning for unbiased chemical classification in X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray emission spectroscopy
    Tetef, Samantha
    Govind, Niranjan
    Seidler, Gerald T.
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (41) : 23586 - 23601
  • [4] Global properties of X-ray afterglows of GRB
    Piro, L.
    NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (4-5): : 473 - 480
  • [5] Global properties of X-ray afterglows of GRB
    Piro, L
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA C-COLLOQUIA ON PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (4-5): : 473 - 480
  • [6] The X-ray, optical and infrared counterpart to GRB 980703
    Vreeswijk, PM
    Galama, TJ
    Owens, AN
    Oosterbroek, T
    Geballe, T
    van Paradijs, J
    Kouveliotou, C
    Tanvir, N
    Pian, E
    Palazzi, E
    Frontera, F
    Masetti, N
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1999, 138 (03): : 447 - 448
  • [7] DISSECTING THE GRB ENVIRONMENT WITH OPTICAL AND X-RAY OBSERVATIONS
    Campana, S.
    GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: 15 YEARS OF GRB AFTERGLOWS - PROGENITORS, ENVIRONMENTS AND HOST GALAXIES FROM THE NEARBY TO THE EARLY UNIVERSE, 2013, 61 : 359 - 365
  • [8] The X-ray, optical, and infrared counterpart to GRB 980703
    Vreeswijk, PM
    Galama, TJ
    Owens, A
    Oosterbroek, T
    Geballe, TR
    van Paradijs, J
    Groot, PJ
    Kouveliotou, C
    Koshut, T
    Tanvir, N
    Wijers, RAMJ
    Pian, E
    Palazzi, E
    Frontera, F
    Masetti, N
    Robinson, C
    Briggs, M
    Zand, JJMI
    Heise, J
    Piro, L
    Costa, E
    Feroci, M
    Antonelli, LA
    Hurley, K
    Greiner, J
    Smith, DA
    Levine, AM
    Lipkin, Y
    Leibowitz, E
    Lidman, C
    Pizzella, A
    Böhnhardt, H
    Doublier, V
    Chaty, S
    Smail, I
    Blain, A
    Hough, JH
    Young, S
    Suntzeff, N
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 523 (01): : 171 - 176
  • [9] GRB X-Ray Flare Properties among Different GRB Subclasses
    Liu, Chuanxi
    Mao, Jirong
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 884 (01):
  • [10] Machine Learning Estimation of Plateau Stress of Aluminum Foam Using X-ray Computed Tomography Images
    Hangai, Yoshihiko
    Ozawa, So
    Okada, Kenji
    Tanaka, Yuuki
    Amagai, Kenji
    Suzuki, Ryosuke
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (05)