The multifaceted concept of disruption: A typology

被引:1
|
作者
Godart, Fred eric [1 ]
Pistilli, Luca [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Blvd Constance, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Lochlann Quinn Sch Business, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Adaptation; Business models; Disruptions; Regulation; Social movements; Technology; RADICAL INNOVATION; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS; STRATEGIC RESPONSES; TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY; TRANSFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114311
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although strategic management scholars have long been interested in disruption as a phenomenon, the latter has not been systematically categorized yet. Building on the existing literature, we develop a typology that encompasses four types of disruption: technological, business model, regulatory, and social movements. Our semisystematic review of the literature sheds light on the characteristics of disruptions and proposes a classification along two dimensions rooted in existing research: whether a disruption is "constraining" vs. "unconstraining", and whether it has an insider-driven vs. outsider-driven origin. We then consider three key phases of strategic action-predictability, ambiguity in response, and imitability-to explore how industry players are affected by the four types of disruption. Our proposed framework is empirically validated in a series of six mini case studies. Our article helps innovation scholars disentangle the nature of different types of disruption depending on their primary cause and shows how non-technological disruptions can challenge incumbents' status.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条