A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Wen, Zhi [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Chen, Cai-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Chong-Jian [1 ]
Chen, Lin-Lin [2 ]
Yang, Xue-song [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Urol, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sixth Peoples Hosp Nanchong, Dept Hemodialysis, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Ureteroscopy(1); Nephrectomy(2); Calculi(3); Lithotripsy (4); Surgery(5); HOLMIUM-YAG LASER; URETERAL ACCESS; RENAL STONES; LITHOTRIPSY; URETEROSCOPY; INTRACORPOREAL; POWER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesComparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).MethodsIn March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We only considered English articles and excluded pediatric patients. Reviews and protocols without any published data were excluded. We also excluded articles with conference abstracts and irrelevant content. We used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects models to assess inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mean differences in categorical variables. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsOur final meta-analysis included nine articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies. The total number of patients included in these studies was 1326, and all studies used holmium laser lithotripsy. The pooled analysis of the dust and fragmentation groups showed that the fragmentation group had a higher stone-free rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.89; p = 0.01); the dust group had a shorter operative time (WMD - 11.6 min; 95% CI - 19.56 - -3.63; p = 0.004); and the dust group had a higher retreatment rate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.31 - 3.13; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, overall complications, or postoperative fever.ConclusionsOur results showed that both procedures could be safely and effectively used for upper ureteral and renal calculi lithotripsy, the dust group had potential advantages over the fragmentation group in terms of the operation time, and the fragmentation group had certain advantages in terms of stone-free rate and retreatment rate.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recent scoring systems predicting stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ozman, Oktay
    Akgul, Haci Murat
    Basatac, Cem
    Sancak, Eyup Burak
    Cinar, Onder
    Cakir, Hakan
    Yazici, Cenk Murat
    Akpinar, Haluk
    Onal, Bulent
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 75 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [32] A meta-analysis: retrograde intrarenal surgery vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children
    Yuan, Yi
    Liang, Yan-nei
    Li, Kai-feng
    Ho, Yi-ru
    Wu, Qian-long
    Zhao, Zhang
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [33] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Jiao, Binbin
    Luo, Zhenkai
    Xu, Xin
    Zhang, Meng
    Zhang, Guan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 71 : 1 - 11
  • [34] Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Chan Hee
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Lee, Seon Heui
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (01): : 1 - 23
  • [35] An Invited Commentary on "Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (International journal of surgery; Epub ahead of print) Could regional anesthesia be a choice for retrograde intrarenal surgery?
    Li, Jia
    Bai, Song
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 83 : 216 - 217
  • [36] Risk of Sepsis in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Corrales, Mariela
    Sierra, Alba
    Doizi, Steeve
    Traxer, Olivier
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 84 - 91
  • [37] Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: an update
    Lee, J. Y.
    Kang, D. H.
    Lee, S. H.
    Cho, K. S.
    Ham, W. S.
    Choi, Y. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 59 - 60
  • [38] Does displacement of lower pole stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves stone-free status? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Santana, Roberto Nogueira
    Porto, Breno Cordeiro
    Passerotti, Carlo Camargo
    Artifon, Everson Luiz de Almeida
    Otoch, Jose Pinhata
    da Cruz, Jose Arnaldo Shiomi
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2023, 38
  • [39] Retrograde Autologous Priming in Cardiac Surgery: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hensley, Nadia B.
    Gyi, Richard
    Zorrilla-Vaca, Andres
    Choi, Chun W.
    Lawton, Jennifer S.
    Brown, Charles H.
    Frank, Steve M.
    Grant, Michael C.
    Cho, Brian C.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (01): : 100 - 107
  • [40] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones &gt;1 cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Dorantes-Carrillo, Luis Alberto
    Basulto-Martinez, Mario
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Heinze, Alexander
    Proietti, Silvia
    Flores-Tapia, Juan Pablo
    Esqueda-Mendoza, Antonio
    Giusti, Guido
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (01): : 259 - 270