Biofilm formation on dental implants with a hybrid surface microtopography: An in vitro study in a validated multispecies dynamic biofilm model

被引:3
|
作者
Bravo, Enrique [1 ]
Serrano, Benjamin [2 ]
Ribeiro-Vidal, Honorato [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Virto, Leire [1 ,4 ]
Sanz Sanchez, Ignacio [1 ,2 ]
Herrera, David [1 ,2 ]
Sanz, Mariano [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Fac Odontol, ETEP Etiol & Therapy Periodontal & Periimplant Di, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense, Postgrad Periodontol, Fac Odontol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Oporto, Portugal
[4] Univ Complutense, Fac Opt, Dept Anat & Embryol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
bacterial biofilm; hybrid dental implant; implant surface; in vitro; peri-implant diseases; qPCR; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; FOLLOW-UP; BONE; CHLORHEXIDINE; RESTORATIONS; PROSTHESES; ROUGHNESS; SURVIVAL; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14054
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate biofilm formation on hybrid titanium implants (HS), with moderately rough and turned surface topographies. Materials and MethodsA validated dynamic in vitro multispecies biofilm model, based on bacterial growth under flow and shear conditions resembling the oral cavity, was used to evaluate biofilm formation on the tested implant surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were used to compare the biofilm structure and microbial biomass deposited on either the moderately rough or the turned surface of HS. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to evaluate the total bacterial counts and counts of each specific bacterium in biofilms formed on implants with either the moderately rough or the turned surfaces, as in the hybrid titanium implants, after 24, 48 and 72 h. A general linear model was applied to compare the CLSM and qPCR results between the tested implant surfaces. ResultsA significantly higher bacterial biomass grew on the moderately rough implant surfaces, compared to the turned surface area of HS implants (p < .05), at all incubation times, as evidenced with both CLSM and SEM. qPCR analysis also demonstrated an important increase in the total and specific bacterial counts in moderately rough surface implants at the three incubation times. ConclusionsImplant surface topography (moderately rough versus turned) significantly influenced in vitro biofilm formation in terms of biofilm structure, bacterial biomass and quantity of the specific species selected for the model used.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of inhibitory effects of fluoride-coated tubes on biofilm formation by using the in vitro dental unit waterline biofilm model
    Yabune, Toshiaki
    Imazato, Satoshi
    Ebisu, Shigeyuki
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (19) : 5958 - 5964
  • [32] In vitro methods to study staphylococcal biofilm formation
    Cramton, SE
    Gerke, C
    Götz, F
    MICROBIAL GROWTH IN BIOFILMS, PT A: DEVELOPMENTAL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS, 2001, 336 : 239 - 255
  • [33] Initial oral biofilm formation on titanium implants with different surface treatments: An in vivo study
    Ribeiro, Cyntia Ferreira
    Cogo-Muller, Karina
    Franco, Gilson Cesar
    Silva-Concilio, Lais Regiane
    Campos, Marcia Sampaio
    Rode, Sigmar de Mello
    Claro Neves, Ana Christina
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 69 : 33 - 39
  • [34] Structural, Surface, in vitro Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation Analysis of Three Dental Restorative Composites
    Azam, Maria T.
    Khan, Abdul S.
    Muzzafar, Danish
    Faryal, Rani
    Siddiqi, Saadat A.
    Ahmad, Riaz
    Chauhdry, Aqif A.
    Rehman, Ihtesham U.
    MATERIALS, 2015, 8 (06) : 3221 - 3237
  • [35] In vitro study of biofilm formation and effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment on various dental material surfaces
    Li, L.
    Finnegan, M. B.
    Oezkan, S.
    Kim, Y.
    Lillehoj, P. B.
    Ho, C. -M.
    Lux, R.
    Mito, R.
    Loewy, Z.
    Shi, W.
    MOLECULAR ORAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 25 (06) : 384 - 390
  • [36] Influence of different instrumentation modalities on the surface characteristics and biofilm formation on dental implant neck, in vitro
    Schmidt, Kristina Emily
    Auschill, Thorsten Mathias
    Heumann, Christian
    Frankenberger, Roland
    Eick, Sigrun
    Sculean, Anton
    Arweiler, Nicole Birgit
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (04) : 483 - 490
  • [37] The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation
    Kligman, Stefanie
    Ren, Zhi
    Chung, Chun-Hsi
    Perillo, Michael Angelo
    Chang, Yu-Cheng
    Koo, Hyun
    Zheng, Zhong
    Li, Chenshuang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (08)
  • [38] In Vitro Dental Plaque Culture Model for Biofilm Structural Analyses
    Lemus, Alex A.
    Valm, Alex M.
    CURRENT PROTOCOLS, 2023, 3 (10):
  • [39] Study of Formation Factor of Biofilm on Aluminum surface and Removal Efficiency of Biofilm by Antimicrobials
    Park, SangJun
    Oh, YoungHwan
    Jo, BoYeon
    Lee, JaeShin
    Lee, SangWha
    Jeong, JaeHyun
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (06): : 730 - 739
  • [40] Effect of chlorhexidine/thymol and fluoride varnishes on dental biofilm formation in vitro
    Takeuchi, Yasuo
    Guggenheim, Bernhard
    Filieri, Anna
    Baehni, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2007, 115 (06) : 468 - 472