Biofilm formation on dental implants with a hybrid surface microtopography: An in vitro study in a validated multispecies dynamic biofilm model

被引:3
|
作者
Bravo, Enrique [1 ]
Serrano, Benjamin [2 ]
Ribeiro-Vidal, Honorato [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Virto, Leire [1 ,4 ]
Sanz Sanchez, Ignacio [1 ,2 ]
Herrera, David [1 ,2 ]
Sanz, Mariano [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Fac Odontol, ETEP Etiol & Therapy Periodontal & Periimplant Di, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense, Postgrad Periodontol, Fac Odontol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, Oporto, Portugal
[4] Univ Complutense, Fac Opt, Dept Anat & Embryol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
bacterial biofilm; hybrid dental implant; implant surface; in vitro; peri-implant diseases; qPCR; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; FOLLOW-UP; BONE; CHLORHEXIDINE; RESTORATIONS; PROSTHESES; ROUGHNESS; SURVIVAL; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14054
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate biofilm formation on hybrid titanium implants (HS), with moderately rough and turned surface topographies. Materials and MethodsA validated dynamic in vitro multispecies biofilm model, based on bacterial growth under flow and shear conditions resembling the oral cavity, was used to evaluate biofilm formation on the tested implant surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were used to compare the biofilm structure and microbial biomass deposited on either the moderately rough or the turned surface of HS. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to evaluate the total bacterial counts and counts of each specific bacterium in biofilms formed on implants with either the moderately rough or the turned surfaces, as in the hybrid titanium implants, after 24, 48 and 72 h. A general linear model was applied to compare the CLSM and qPCR results between the tested implant surfaces. ResultsA significantly higher bacterial biomass grew on the moderately rough implant surfaces, compared to the turned surface area of HS implants (p < .05), at all incubation times, as evidenced with both CLSM and SEM. qPCR analysis also demonstrated an important increase in the total and specific bacterial counts in moderately rough surface implants at the three incubation times. ConclusionsImplant surface topography (moderately rough versus turned) significantly influenced in vitro biofilm formation in terms of biofilm structure, bacterial biomass and quantity of the specific species selected for the model used.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biofilm formation on dental implants with different surface micro-topography: An in vitro study
    Bermejo, Patricia
    Carmen Sanchez, Maria
    Llama-Palacios, Arancha
    Figuero, Elena
    Herrera, David
    Sanz Alonso, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (08) : 725 - 734
  • [2] An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: Structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces
    Sanchez, M. C.
    Llama-Palacios, A.
    Fernandez, E.
    Figuero, E.
    Marin, M. J.
    Leon, R.
    Blanc, V.
    Herrera, D.
    Sanz, M.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (10) : 1161 - 1171
  • [3] Electrochemical decontamination of titanium dental implants. An in vitro biofilm model study
    Virto, Leire
    Odeh, Veronica
    Garcia-Quismondo, Enrique
    Herrera, David
    Palma, Jesus
    Tamimi, Faleh
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (05) : 486 - 497
  • [4] Chemotherapeutic decontamination of dental implants colonized by mature multispecies oral biofilm
    Dostie, Sebastien
    Alkadi, Lubna T.
    Owen, Gethin
    Bi, Jiarui
    Shen, Ya
    Haapasalo, Markus
    Larjava, Hannu S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (04) : 403 - 409
  • [5] Biofilm formation in an in vitro model of cochlear implants with removable magnets
    Loeffler, Kimberly A.
    Johnson, Trey A.
    Burne, Robert A.
    Antonelli, Patrick J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (04) : 583 - 588
  • [6] Effect of dental restorative materials surface roughness on the in vitro biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm
    Contreras-Guerrero, Paulina
    Ortiz-Magdaleno, Marine
    Salvador Urcuyo-Alvarado, Manuel
    Antonio Cepeda-Bravo, Juan
    Leyva-del Rio, Diana
    Elias Perez-Lopez, Jose
    Fernando Romo-Ramirez, Gabriel
    Octavio Sanchez-Vargas, Luis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 33 (02): : 59 - 63
  • [7] Biofilm formation by heat-resistant dairy bacteria: multispecies biofilm model under static and dynamic conditions
    Diarra, Carine
    Goetz, Coralie
    Gagnon, Merilie
    Roy, Denis
    Jean, Julie
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 89 (10)
  • [8] Impact of engineered surface microtopography on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus
    Chung, Kenneth K.
    Schumacher, James F.
    Sampson, Edith M.
    Burne, Robert A.
    Antonelli, Patrick J.
    Brennana, Anthony B.
    BIOINTERPHASES, 2007, 2 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [9] In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model
    Sun, Yan
    Dowd, Scot E.
    Smith, Ethan
    Rhoads, Dan D.
    Wolcott, Randall D.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2008, 16 (06) : 805 - 813
  • [10] Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
    Silva, Thalisson S. O.
    Freitas, Alice R.
    Pinheiro, Marilia L. L.
    do Nascimento, Cassio
    Watanabe, Evandro
    Albuquerque, Rubens F.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2018, (136):