Accuracy of self-assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Scaffidi, Michael A. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Juana [1 ]
Genis, Shai [1 ]
Tipton, Elizabeth [3 ,4 ]
Khan, Rishad [1 ]
Pattni, Chandni [1 ]
Gimpaya, Nikko [1 ]
Bradley-Ridout, Glyneva [5 ]
Walsh, Catharine M. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Grover, Samir C. [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Stat, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Gerstein Sci Informat Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT-TOOL; ASSESS PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1929-1318
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Assessment is necessary to ensure both attainment and maintenance of competency in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, and this can be accomplished through self-assessment. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of self-assessment among GI endoscopists. Methods This was an individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that investigated self-assessment of endoscopic competency. We performed a systematic search of the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Wiley Cochrane CENTRAL, and ProQuest Education Resources Information Center. We included studies if they were primary investigations of self-assessment accuracy in GI endoscopy that used statistical analyses to determine accuracy. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies using a limits of agreement (LoA) approach to meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies. Results After removing duplicate entries, we screened 7138 records. After full-text review, we included 16 studies for qualitative analysis and three for meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, we found that the LoA were wide (-41.0% to 34.0%) and beyond the clinically acceptable difference. Subgroup analyses found that both novice and intermediate endoscopists had wide LoA (-45.0% to 35.1% and -54.7% to 46.5%, respectively) and expert endoscopists had narrow LoA (-14.2% to 21.4 %). Conclusions GI endoscopists are inaccurate in self-assessment of their endoscopic competency. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that novice and intermediate endoscopists were inaccurate, while expert endoscopists have accurate self-assessment. While we advise against the sole use of self-assessment among novice and intermediate endoscopists, expert endoscopists may wish to integrate it into their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 185
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Conscious Sedation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Patel, Brijesh
    Andrade, Christian
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Rodriguez, Andrea C.
    Lipka, Seth
    Vidyarthi, Gitanjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S942 - S942
  • [42] Systematic review with meta-analysis: age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
    de Jong, Judith J.
    Lantinga, Marten A.
    Thijs, Ina M. E.
    de Reuver, Philip R.
    Drenth, Joost P. H.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 13
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Wei
    Ge, Xiaoyan
    Gao, Fang
    Kan, Qingfang
    Wang, Shaohua
    Wang, Yikai
    He, Chuan
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lian, Xianghong
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Luo, Ting
    Jing, Yang
    Yuan, Hongbo
    Guo, Yixin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [45] Propofol Versus Traditional Sedative Agents for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Complications
    Wadhwa, Vaibhav
    Issa, Danny
    Lopez, Rocio
    Vargo, John J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB309 - AB310
  • [46] High flow nasal cannula for patients undergoing bronchoscopy and gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tao, Yuan
    Sun, Mingyang
    Miao, Mengrong
    Han, Yaqian
    Yang, Yitian
    Cong, Xuhui
    Zhang, Jiaqiang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [47] Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Tan, Xiangzhou
    Guo, Jianping
    Chen, Zihua
    Koenigsrainer, Alfred
    Wichmann, Doerte
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xianghong Lian
    Yunzhu Lin
    Ting Luo
    Yang Jing
    Hongbo Yuan
    Yixin Guo
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [49] Prokinetics in video capsule endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vicente, Ivan Michaelgargoles
    Ong, Janus
    De Lusong, Mark Anthony
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 737 - 737
  • [50] Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zurek, Michal
    Jasak, Kamil
    Niemczyk, Kazimierz
    Rzepakowska, Anna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)