Winning, Losing, and the Quality of Democracy

被引:28
|
作者
Nadeau, Richard [1 ]
Daoust, Jean-Francois [2 ]
Dassonneville, Ruth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Polit Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Polit & Int Relat, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
satisfaction with democracy; electoral democracy; winners; losers; abstainers; quality of democracy; motivated reasoning; ELECTORAL INTEGRITY; SATISFACTION; ELECTION; INSTITUTIONS; LOSERS; WINNERS; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; CITIZENS; POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1177/00323217211026189
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Citizens who voted for a party that won the election are more satisfied with democracy than those who did not. This winner-loser gap has recently been found to vary with the quality of electoral democracy: the higher the quality of democracy, the smaller the gap. However, we do not know what drives this relationship. Is it driven by losers, winners, or both? And Why? Linking our work to the literature on motivated reasoning and macro salience and benefiting from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems project-covering 163 elections in 51 countries between 1996 and 2018, our results show that the narrower winner-loser gap in well-established electoral democracies is not only a result of losers being more satisfied with democracy, but also of winners being less satisfied with their victory. Our findings carry important implications since a narrow winner-loser gap appears as a key feature of healthy democratic systems.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 500
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条