Site evaluation of subsea tunnels with sightseeing function based on dynamic complex MARCOS method

被引:11
|
作者
Zeng, Shouzhen [1 ]
Ye, Anqi [2 ]
Su, Weihua [2 ]
Chen, Manlei [2 ]
Llopis-Albert, Carlos [3 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Sch Business, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Coll Stat & Math, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Univ Ingn Mecan & Biomecan I2MB, Camino Vera S-n, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
Subsea tunnels with sightseeing function; Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy set; MARCOS; Multi -attribute decision making; Dynamic evaluation; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MEAN OPERATORS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; FUZZY; SELECTION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Subsea tunnels with sightseeing function (STSF) are valuable for integrating transportation across different locations, particularly in cross-sea regions. Given their technical complexity, significant capital commitment, and substantial social impact, site evaluation of STSF has become a critical priority. In this study, a dynamic complex measurement alternative and ranking according to the compromise solution (MARCOS) framework is proposed for STSF site evaluation in a Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment. A novel score function for a Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy set is defined to handle an incomparable problem. Moreover, a growth coefficient matrix is constructed to reflect the internal development potential of decision objects, considering changes in expert and criteria weights during the dynamic decision-making process. An STSF evaluation system is designed to satisfy stability, sociality, and economic developments. An empirical study is conducted in Zhejiang Province, China, to verify the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation framework by comparing its results with other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Method of periodic dynamic pattern mining based on complex network
    Wang, Lei
    Jiang, Liya
    Dong, Jun
    Huang, Guoyan
    Ren, Jiadong
    Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2015, 11 (21): : 7849 - 7856
  • [32] Evaluation of Loop Transfer Function Based Dynamic Testing of LDOs
    Ince, Mehmet
    Yilmaz, Ender
    Jeong, Jae Woong
    Winemberg, Leroy
    Ozev, Sule
    2017 INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE IN ASIA (ITC-ASIA), 2017, : 14 - 19
  • [33] A dynamic assessment method on collapse risk of small spacing tunnels based on attribute interval recognition model
    Bo Wu
    Huihao Chen
    Guowang Meng
    Wei Huang
    Junhua Cai
    Yicai Li
    Yao Zhang
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (23)
  • [34] An Unsupervised Evaluation Method Based on Probability Density Function
    Eftekhari-Moghadam, Amir-Masud
    Abdechiri, Marjan
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS (ISIE 2010), 2010, : 1573 - 1578
  • [35] An automatic clustering method based on distance evaluation function
    Zhou Hong-bo
    Gao Jun-tao
    2014 IEEE WORKSHOP ON ELECTRONICS, COMPUTER AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, : 641 - 644
  • [37] Development and Verification of Edge Detection Method Based on Neurophysiology-based Models ̶Application to Visibility Evaluation in Tunnels̶
    Shida H.
    Hashimoto K.
    Yoshizawa N.
    Kodaira Y.
    Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi), 2023, 107 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [38] Table-based Method for Reconfigurable Function Evaluation
    Signes Pont, Maria Teresa
    Mora Mora, Higinio
    Garcia Chamizo, Juan Manuel
    de Miguel Casado, Gregorio
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL & DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1224 - +
  • [39] Table-based recursive method for function evaluation
    Pont, M. T. Signes
    Casado, G. de Miguel
    Mora, H. Mora
    Chamizo, J. M. Garcia
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2007, 936 : 511 - +
  • [40] A method of dynamic members selection based on frontier production function
    Xu, Shenghua
    Lu, Liang
    Fifth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-3: INTEGRATION AND INNOVATION THROUGH MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, : 2450 - 2455