Is Oligometastatic Cancer Curable? A Survey of Oncologist Perspectives, Decision Making, and Communication

被引:4
|
作者
Cho, Hae Lin [1 ]
Balboni, Tracy [2 ,3 ]
Christ, Sebastian Matthias [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Turner, Brandon [2 ,3 ]
Spektor, Alexander [2 ,3 ]
Perni, Subha [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; PROSTATE-CANCER; PROGNOSIS; PERCEPTIONS; SURVIVAL; ACCURACY; DISEASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101221
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) refers to a limited state of metastatic cancer, which potentially derives benefit from local treatments. Given the relative novelty of this paradigm, oncologist perspectives on OMD are not well established. We thus explored oncologist views on curability of and treatment recommendations for patients with OMD.Methods and Materials: We developed a survey focused on oncologist views of 3 subtypes of OMD: synchronous, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive. Eligible participants included medical and radiation oncologists at 2 large cancer centers invited to participate between May and June 2022. Participants were presented with 3 hypothetical patient scenarios and asked about treatment recommendations, rationale, and demographic information.Results: Of 44 respondents, over half (61.4%) agreed that synchronous OMD is curable. A smaller proportion (46.2% and 13.5%) agreed for oligorecurrence and oligoprogression, respectively. When asked whether they use the word "cure" or "curative" in discussing prognosis, 31.8% and 33.3% agreed for synchronous and oligorecurrent OMD, respectively, while 78.4% disagreed for oligoprogression. Views on curability did not significantly affect treatment recommendations. More medical oncologists recommended systemic treatment only compared with radiation oncologists for the synchronous OMD (50.0% vs 5.3%; P < .01) and oligoprogression cases (43.8% vs 10.5%; P = .02), not the oligorecurrent case. There were no significant differences in confidence in treatment recommendations by specialty.Conclusions: In this exploratory study, we found notable divergence in oncologists' views about curability of OMD as well as variability in treatment recommendations, suggesting need for more robust research on outcomes of patients with OMD.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Intermediate Oncotype DX Score on Oncologist Decision-Making
    Thurow, Tiffany
    Zhou, Eng
    Goldschmidt, Robert
    Watkin, William
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 70A - 71A
  • [42] On interactive communication and decision making
    Gear, AE
    Minkes, AL
    Read, MJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (1-2) : 208 - 222
  • [43] Understanding potential communication gaps between Oncologists and patients with advanced breast cancer: A survey of oncologist.
    Brufsky, Adam
    Citron, Marc L.
    Percassi, Deana
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (26)
  • [44] Effects of Intermediate Oncotype DX Score on Oncologist Decision-Making
    Thurow, Tiffany
    Zhou, Ying
    Goldschmidt, Robert
    Watkin, William
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 70A - 71A
  • [45] Family-oncologist communication in cancer patient care
    Burkhalter, JE
    Bromberg, SR
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2003, 21 (06) : 915 - 923
  • [46] Communication between doctors and curable cancer patients
    deMaddalena, H
    HNO, 1996, 44 (11) : 645 - 654
  • [47] A Time to Decide: Patient Perspectives on Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Making
    May, Suepattra
    Rendle, Katharine
    Ventre, Nicole
    Frosch, Dominick
    Kurian, Allison
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2011, 10 (04): : 456 - 456
  • [48] Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study
    Gutman, Talia
    Hanson, Camilla S.
    Bernays, Sarah
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Sinha, Aditi
    Dart, Allison
    Eddy, Allison A.
    Gipson, Debbie S.
    Bockenhauer, Detlef
    Yap, Hui-Kim
    Groothoff, Jaap
    Zappitelli, Michael
    Webb, Nicholas J. A.
    Alexander, Stephen, I
    Goldstein, Stuart L.
    Furth, Susan
    Samuel, Susan
    Blydt-Hansen, Tom
    Dionne, Janis
    Michael, Mini
    Wenderfer, Scott E.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    Currier, Helen
    McTaggart, Steven
    Walker, Amanda
    Ralph, Angelique F.
    Ju, Angela
    James, Laura J.
    Carter, Simon
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 72 (04) : 547 - 559
  • [49] Parents' Perspectives on Communication and Shared Decision Making for Febrile Infants ≤60 Days Old
    Aronson, Paul L.
    Schaeffer, Paula
    Niccolai, Linda M.
    Shapiro, Eugene D.
    Fraenkel, Liana
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 37 (12) : E1213 - E1219
  • [50] Physicians' perspectives on communication and decision making in clinical encounters for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection
    Dobler, Claudia C.
    Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia
    Armour, Carol L.
    ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (01)