Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study

被引:23
|
作者
Cowan, Annie [1 ]
Ferrari, Federico [1 ,3 ]
Freeman, Samuel S. [2 ]
Redd, Robert [1 ]
El-Khoury, Habib [1 ]
Perry, Jacqueline [1 ]
Patel, Vidhi [1 ]
Kaur, Priya [1 ]
Barr, Hadley [1 ]
Lee, David J. [1 ,4 ]
Lightbody, Elizabeth [1 ]
Downey, Katelyn [1 ]
Argyelan, David [1 ]
Theodorakakou, Foteini [5 ]
Fotiou, Despina [5 ]
Liacos, Christine Ivy [5 ]
Kanellias, Nikolaos [5 ]
Chavda, Selina J. [6 ]
Ainley, Louise [6 ]
Sandecka, Viera [7 ]
Pospisilova, Lenka [8 ]
Minarik, Jiri [9 ]
Jungova, Alexandra [10 ]
Radocha, Jakub [11 ]
Spicka, Ivan [12 ]
Nadeem, Omar [1 ]
Yong, Kwee [6 ]
Hajek, Roman [13 ]
Kastritis, Efstathios [5 ]
Marinac, Catherine R. [1 ]
Dimopoulos, Meletios A. [5 ]
Get, Gad [2 ]
Trippa, Lorenzo [1 ]
Ghobrial, Irene M. [1 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Med Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Bioinformat Program, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, Biostat & Res Decis Sci, Rahway, NJ USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Clin Therapeut, Athens, Greece
[6] UCL, UCL Canc Inst, London, England
[7] Univ Hosp Brno, Dept Internal Med Hematol & Oncol, Brno, Czech Republic
[8] Inst Biostat & Anal, Brno, Czech Republic
[9] Univ Hosp Olomouc, Dept Hematooncol, Olomouc, Czech Republic
[10] Univ Hosp Plzen, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Plzen, Czech Republic
[11] Charles Univ Prague, Univ Hosp Hradec Kralove, Fac Med Hradec Kralove, Dept Internal Med Hematol 4, Prague, Czech Republic
[12] Charles Univ Prague, Gen Hosp Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Med 1, Prague, Czech Republic
[13] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Internal Med Hematol 4, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[14] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY | 2023年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
MULTIPARAMETER FLOW-CYTOMETRY; RISK STRATIFICATION; ABNORMALITIES; DIAGNOSIS; CRITERIA; MGUS;
D O I
10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00386-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Patients with precursors to multiple myeloma are dichotomised as having monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma on the basis of monoclonal protein concentrations or bone marrow plasma cell percentage. Current risk stratifications use laboratory measurements at diagnosis and do not incorporate time-varying biomarkers. Our goal was to develop a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma stratification algorithm that utilised accessible, time-varying biomarkers to model risk of progression to multiple myeloma.Methods In this retrospective, multicohort study, we included patients who were 18 years or older with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma. We evaluated several modelling approaches for predicting disease progression to multiple myeloma using a training cohort (with patients at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; annotated from Nov, 13, 2019, to April, 13, 2022). We created the PANGEA models, which used data on biomarkers (monoclonal protein concentration, free light chain ratio, age, creatinine concentration, and bone marrow plasma cell percentage) and haemoglobin trajectories from medical records to predict progression from precursor disease to multiple myeloma. The models were validated in two independent validation cohorts from National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Athens, Greece; from Jan 26, 2020, to Feb 7, 2022; validation cohort 1), University College London (London, UK; from June 9, 2020, to April 10, 2022; validation cohort 1), and Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (Czech Republic, Czech Republic; Jan 5, 2004, to March 10, 2022; validation cohort 2). We compared the PANGEA models (with bone marrow [BM] data and without bone marrow [no BM] data) to current criteria (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 20/2/20 smouldering multiple myeloma risk criteria).Findings We included 6441 patients, 4931 (77%) with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and 1510 (23%) with smouldering multiple myeloma. 3430 (53%) of 6441 participants were female. The PANGEA model (BM) improved prediction of progression from smouldering multiple myeloma to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model, with a C-statistic increase from 0middot533 (0middot480-0middot709) to 0middot756 (0middot629-0middot785) at patient visit 1 to the clinic, 0middot613 (0middot504-0middot704) to 0middot720 (0middot592-0middot775) at visit 2, and 0middot637 (0middot386-0middot841) to 0middot756 (0middot547-0middot830) at visit three in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA model (no BM) improved prediction of smouldering multiple myeloma progression to multiple myeloma compared with the 20/2/20 model with a C-statistic increase from 0middot534 (0middot501-0middot672) to 0middot692 (0middot614-0middot736) at visit 1, 0middot573 (0middot518-0middot647) to 0middot693 (0middot605-0middot734) at visit 2, and 0middot560 (0middot497-0middot645) to 0middot692 (0middot570-0middot708) at visit 3 in validation cohort 1. The PANGEA models improved prediction of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance progression to multiple myeloma compared with the IMWG rolling model at visit 1 in validation cohort 2, with C-statistics increases from 0middot640 (0middot518-0middot718) to 0middot729 (0middot643-0middot941) for the PANGEA model (BM) and 0middot670 (0middot523-0middot729) to 0middot879 (0middot586-0middot938) for the PANGEA model (no BM). Interpretation Use of the PANGEA models in clinical practice will allow patients with precursor disease to receive more accurate measures of their risk of progression to multiple myeloma, thus prompting for more appropriate treatment strategies.Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:E203 / E212
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prothrombotic abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Nielsen, Thoger
    Kristensen, Soren Risom
    Gregersen, Henrik
    Teodorescu, Elena Manuela
    Pedersen, Shona
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 202 : 108 - 118
  • [22] Bone markers in patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
    Glendenning, P
    Vasikaran, SD
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2002, 32 (1-2) : 56 - 57
  • [23] Stromal alterations in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma, and multiple myeloma
    Bogun, Lucienne
    Koch, Annemarie
    Scherer, Bo
    Fenk, Roland
    Maus, Uwe
    Bormann, Felix
    Koehrer, Karl
    Petzsch, Patrick
    Wachtmeister, Thorsten
    Zukovs, Romans
    Dietrich, Sascha
    Haas, Rainer
    Schroeder, Thomas
    Jaeger, Paul
    Geyh, Stefanie
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2024, 8 (10) : 2575 - 2588
  • [24] Aberrant gene methylation implicated in the progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma
    Chim, Chor-Sang
    Liang, Raymond
    Leung, Man-Hin
    Kwong, Yok-Lam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) : 104 - 106
  • [25] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and solitary plasmacytoma - Implications for progression to overt multiple myeloma
    Kyle, RA
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 11 (01) : 71 - &
  • [26] Predictive Immune Markers for Disease Progression in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
    Isgor, Irem Sahver
    Toptas, Tayfur
    Turkoz, Huseyin Kemal
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (04) : 245 - 253
  • [27] Association of Immune Marker Changes With Progression of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Multiple Myeloma
    Landgren, Ola
    Hofmann, Jonathan N.
    McShane, Charlene M.
    Santo, Loredana
    Hultcrantz, Malin
    Korde, Neha
    Mailankody, Sham
    Kazandjian, Dickran
    Murata, Kazunori
    Thoren, Katie
    Ramanathan, Lakshmi
    Dogan, Ahmet
    Rustad, Even
    Lu, Sydney X.
    Akhlaghi, Theresia
    Kristinsson, Sigurdur Y.
    Bjorkholm, Magnus
    Devlin, Sean
    Purdue, Mark P.
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    Turesson, Ingemar
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (09) : 1293 - 1301
  • [28] Obesity and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and progression to multiple myeloma: a population-based study
    Thordardottir, Marianna
    Lindqvist, Ebba K.
    Lund, Sigrun H.
    Costello, Rene
    Burton, Debra
    Korde, Neha
    Mailankody, Sham
    Eiriksdottir, Gudny
    Launer, Lenore J.
    Gudnason, Vilmundur
    Harris, Tamara B.
    Landgren, Ola
    Kristinsson, Sigurdur Y.
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2017, 1 (24) : 2186 - 2192
  • [29] Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Multiple Myeloma in Older Adults
    Guerard, Emily J.
    Tuchman, Sascha A.
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2016, 32 (01) : 191 - +
  • [30] Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: to screen or not to screen for multiple myeloma?
    Go, Ronald S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2010, 149 (04) : 620 - 621