Moving Bedforms Control CO2 Production and Distribution in Sandy River Sediments

被引:3
|
作者
Schulz, H. [1 ,2 ]
Teitelbaum, Y. [3 ]
Lewandowski, J. [1 ,2 ]
Singer, G. A. [1 ,4 ]
Arnon, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisheries, Dept Ecohydrol & Biogeochem, Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zuckerberg Inst Water Res, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Ecol, Innsbruck, Austria
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
GAINING STREAMFLOW CONDITIONS; DISSOLVED INORGANIC CARBON; HYPORHEIC ZONE; PERMEABLE SEDIMENTS; NONSORBING SOLUTES; ORGANIC-CARBON; METABOLISM; EXCHANGE; FLUXES; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2022JG007156
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Streams and rivers play an important role in the global carbon cycle. The origins of CO2 in streams are often poorly constrained or neglected, which is especially true for CO2 originating from heterotrophic metabolism in streambeds. We hypothesized that sediment movement will have a direct effect on stream metabolism, and thus, the aim of this study was to quantify the effect of moving bedforms on the production of CO2 in sandy streambeds. We conducted flume experiments where we used planar optodes to measure the distributions of O-2 and CO2 under various streambed celerities. We combined these measurements with an assessment of bed morphodynamics and modeling to calculate O-2 consumption and CO2 production rates. Our results indicate that sediment transport can strongly influence streambed metabolism and CO2 production. We found that bedform celerity controls the shape of the hyporheic zone and exchange flux, and is directly linked to the spatial and temporal distributions of O-2 and CO2. It was also found that the most pronounced change in CO2 production occurred when the bed changed from stationary conditions to a slowly moving bed. A more gradual increase in O-2 consumption and CO2 production rates was observed with further increase in celerity. Our study also points out that bedform movement causes hydraulic isolation between the moving and the non-moving fraction of the streambed that can lead to a transient storage of CO2 in deeper sediments, which may be released in bursts during bed scour.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CASE FOR CO2 CONTROL
    BELZ, RJ
    INSTRUMENTATION, 1969, 22 (03): : 4 - &
  • [42] MEASURES OF CO2 CONTROL
    MARCHETTI, C
    EXPERIENTIA, 1980, 36 (07): : 806 - 807
  • [43] CO2 MOBILITY CONTROL
    DELLINGER, SE
    PATTON, JT
    HOLBROOK, ST
    SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1984, 24 (02): : 191 - 196
  • [44] Control CO2 -: not climate
    Christiano, John J.
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 2007, 44 (07) : 8 - 8
  • [45] Perioperative control of CO2
    Brian P. Kavanagh
    John G. Laffey
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2003, 50 (Suppl 1): : R45 - R50
  • [46] A MODEL FOR DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSPORT OF CO2 IN BODY AND VENTILATORY RESPONSE TO CO2
    MATTHEWS, CM
    LASZLO, G
    CAMPBELL, EJ
    READ, DJC
    RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1968, 6 (01): : 45 - +
  • [47] Distribution of CO2 species, estimates of net community production, and air-sea CO2 exchange in the Ross Sea polynya
    Bates, NR
    Hansell, DA
    Carlson, CA
    Gordon, LI
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1998, 103 (C2) : 2883 - 2896
  • [48] Dynamics Of CO2 partial pressure and CO2 outgassing in the lower reaches of the Xijiang River, a subtropical monsoon river in China
    Yao, Guanrong
    Gao, Quanzhou
    Wang, Zhengang
    Huang, Xiakun
    He, Tong
    Zhang, Yongling
    Jiao, Shulin
    Ding, Jian
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 376 (1-3) : 255 - 266
  • [49] CO2 partial pressure and CO2 emission along the lower Red River (Vietnam)
    Thi Phuong Quynh Le
    Marchand, Cyril
    Cuong Tu Ho
    Nhu Da Le
    Thi Thuy Duong
    Lu, Xixi
    Phuong Kieu Doan
    Trung Kien Nguyen
    Thi Mai Huong Nguyen
    Duy An Vu
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2018, 15 (15) : 4799 - 4814
  • [50] Distribution Dynamics of CO2 Emissions
    Phu Nguyen Van
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 32 : 495 - 508