Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Six modes of corneal topography for evaluation of ablation zones after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Hua Li
    Yusu Peng
    Min Chen
    Le Tian
    Dewei Li
    Feifei Zhang
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2020, 258 : 1555 - 1563
  • [32] Six modes of corneal topography for evaluation of ablation zones after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Li, Hua
    Peng, Yusu
    Chen, Min
    Tian, Le
    Li, Dewei
    Zhang, Feifei
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 258 (07) : 1555 - 1563
  • [33] Comparison of corneal aberrations and refractive outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Riping Zhang
    Heng Wei
    Vishal Jhanji
    Lixia Sun
    Jinyu Li
    Jingjing Jiang
    Suoqing Zhuang
    Mingzhi Zhang
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 2521 - 2531
  • [34] Comparison of corneal aberrations and refractive outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Zhang, Riping
    Wei, Heng
    Jhanji, Vishal
    Sun, Lixia
    Li, Jinyu
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Zhuang, Suoqing
    Zhang, Mingzhi
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (07) : 2521 - 2531
  • [35] Effects of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction on Corneal Biomechanical Behavior: A Finite Element Analysis
    Wang, Chenyan
    Li, Xiaona
    Guo, Yuan
    He, Rui
    Guo, Hongmei
    Chen, Weiyi
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [36] Dry Eye After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: Meta-Analysis
    Kobashi, Hidenaga
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Shimizu, Kimiya
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [37] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Used to Treat Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Yao, Lin
    Zhang, Minghong
    Wang, Dianqiang
    Zhao, Qian
    Wang, Shouyan
    Bai, Haiqing
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 283 - 293
  • [38] Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Ge Tian
    Tong Chen
    Xin Liu
    Yue Lin
    Na Li
    Hua Gao
    Mingna Liu
    Lasers in Medical Science, 38
  • [39] Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia
    Tian, Ge
    Chen, Tong
    Liu, Xin
    Lin, Yue
    Li, Na
    Gao, Hua
    Liu, Mingna
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [40] Survival analysis of myopic regression after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia
    Zhou, Jihong
    Gu, Wei
    Gao, Yan
    Wang, Wenjuan
    Zhang, Fengju
    EYE AND VISION, 2022, 9 (01)