Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Songbai [1 ]
Ma, Hongjie [2 ]
Zhao, Congling [1 ]
机构
[1] Aier Huangpi Eye Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Aier Eye Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
corneal biomechanics; corvis ST (CST); femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK); ocular response analyzer (ORA); small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); ASSISTED LASIK; MYOPIA; FLAP; CAP;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Methods:The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. Results:Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, -0.02; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, -7.91; 95% CI: -17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.27; P = .96). Conclusion:A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis:a Meta-analysis
    Wen-Ting Cai
    Qing-Yu Liu
    Cheng-Da Ren
    Qing-Quan Wei
    Jun-Ling Liu
    Qian-Yi Wang
    Ya-Ru Du
    Meng-Mei He
    Jing Yu
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, (04) : 632 - 638
  • [2] Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a Meta-analysis
    Cai, Wen-Ting
    Liu, Qing-Yu
    Ren, Cheng-Da
    Wei, Qing-Quan
    Liu, Jun-Ling
    Wang, Qian-Yi
    Du, Ya-Ru
    He, Meng-Mei
    Yu, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (04) : 632 - 638
  • [3] Corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis
    Reinstein, Dan Z.
    Archer, Timothy J.
    Gobbe, Marine
    Bartoli, Elena
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (08): : 1580 - 1587
  • [4] Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value-guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Zhang, Jun
    Zheng, Li
    Zhao, Xia
    Xu, Yang
    Chen, Shu
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04): : 181 - 187
  • [5] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shen, Zeren
    Shi, Keda
    Yu, Yinhui
    Yu, Xiaoning
    Lin, Yuchen
    Yao, Ke
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [6] Fourier Analysis of Corneal Irregular Astigmatism After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Comparison to Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
    Sideroudi, Haris
    Sekundo, Walter
    Kozobolis, Vassilios
    Messerschmidt-Roth, Anke
    Lazaridis, Apostolos
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (12) : 1536 - 1542
  • [7] Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic:a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Jia-Song Wang
    Hua-Tao Xie
    Ye Jia
    Ming-Chang Zhang
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, (01) : 115 - 121
  • [8] Small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond lenticule extraction for myopic: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Jia-Song
    Xie, Hua-Tao
    Jia, Ye
    Zhang, Ming-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (01) : 115 - 121
  • [9] Corneal Lenticule Allotransplantation After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Rabbits
    Zhao, Jing
    Shen, Yang
    Tian, Mi
    Sun, Ling
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Zhou, Xingtao
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (02) : 222 - 228
  • [10] Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Laser Assisted Stromal In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Astigmatism Corrections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Song, Jiaxin
    Cao, Huazheng
    Chen, Xuan
    Zhao, Xinheng
    Zhang, Jiamei
    Wu, Guoxi
    Wang, Yan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 247 : 181 - 199