Machine Learning Modeling for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) Signals From mmWave 5G Signals

被引:4
|
作者
Al-Jumaily, Abdulmajeed [1 ,2 ]
Sali, Aduwati [1 ]
Riyadh, Mohammed [1 ]
Wali, Sangin Qahtan [1 ]
Li, Lu [1 ]
Osman, Anwar Faizd [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia UPM, Fac Engn, WiPNET Res Ctr, Dept Comp & Commun Syst Engn, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Signal Theory & Commun, Madrid 28903, Spain
[3] Rohde & Schwarz, PAT Sq, Shah Alam 40150, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
5G; RF-EMF; machine learning ML; approximate-RBFNN algorithm; exact RBFNN algorithm; GRNN algorithm; EXPOSURE; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3265723
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
5G is the next-generation mobile communication technology that is expected to deliver better data rates than Long-Term Evolution (LTE). It offers ultra-low latency and ultra-high dependability, enabling revolutionary services across sectors. However, 5G mmWave base stations may emit harmful radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), raising questions about health and safety. Our research suggests that the RF-EMF prediction model lacks sufficient papers or publications. Therefore, this study employs IEEE and ICNIRP standards for assessment and exposure limits. The measuring campaign analyses one sector of a 5G base station (5G-BS) operating on 29.5 GHz in Cyberjaya, Malaysia. This study proposes two prediction models. The first model predicts the signal beam RF-EMF, while the second predicts the base station RF-EMF. Each model contains three machine learning techniques to forecast RF-EMF values: Approximate-RBFNN, Exact-RBFNN, and GRNN. The results are analysed and compared with the measured data, determining which algorithm is more accurate by calculating the RMSE of each algorithm. As a result, it can be observed that the Exact-RBFNN algorithm is the best algorithm to predict the RF-EMF because it shows good agreement with the measured value. Moreover, in a 1-minute duration, the difference between the predicted and measured values reached 0.2 less channels. However, in 6 minutes and 30 minutes, it can observe more accurate results since the differences between values reach 0.1 in these situations. Additionally, the ICNIRP standard was used and compared with the results and validation values of the algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:79648 / 79658
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optical Generation and Transmission of mmWave Signals in 5G ERA: Experimental Evaluation Paradigm
    Andrianopoulos, Efstathios
    Lyras, Nikolaos K.
    Tsokos, Christos
    Qian, Tianwen
    Nellen, Simon
    de Felipe, David
    Groumas, Panos
    Raptakis, Adam
    Gounaridis, Lefteris
    Keil, Norbert
    Kouloumentas, Christos
    Avramopoulos, Hercules
    IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 34 (19) : 1011 - 1014
  • [22] Analysis of Electromagnetic Interference Effects of 5G Signals on Radio Altimeters
    Duan, Zhaobin
    Xu, Ke
    Ma, Zhenyang
    Wang, Peng
    AEROSPACE, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [23] A comprehensive review of 5G NR RF-EMF exposure assessment technologies: fundamentals, advancements, challenges, niches, and implications
    Korkmaz, Erdal
    Aerts, Sam
    Coesoij, Richard
    Bhatt, Chhavi Raj
    Velghe, Maarten
    Colussi, Loek
    Land, Derek
    Petroulakis, Nikolaos
    Spirito, Marco
    Bolte, John
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 260
  • [24] Defined exposure of honey bee colonies to simulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF): Negative effects on the homing ability, but not on brood development or longevity
    Treder, Manuel
    Mueller, Marcus
    Fellner, Larissa
    Traynor, Kirsten
    Rosenkranz, Peter
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 896
  • [25] Interaction of 5G mid-band and mmWave electromagnetic fields with the murine fetus
    Foroughimehr, Negin
    Vilagosh, Zoltan
    Mcintosh, Robert
    Wood, Andrew
    Yavari, Ali
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 274
  • [26] Machine-Learning-Based LOS Detection for 5G Signals with Applications in Airport Environments
    Jayawardana, Palihawadana A. D. Nirmal
    Obaid, Hadeel
    Yesilyurt, Taylan
    Tan, Bo
    Lohan, Elena Simona
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (03)
  • [27] Waveforms of 4G and 5G Radiofrequency Signals: Are Differences Relevant to Biology or Health?
    Foster, Kenneth R.
    Maxson, David
    Zollman, Peter M.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2025, 128 (04): : 332 - 336
  • [28] Interference Analysis and Modeling of Positioning Reference Signals in 5G NTN
    Gonzalez-Garrido, Alejandro
    Querol, Jorge
    Wymeersch, Henk
    Chatzinotas, Symeon
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY, 2024, 5 : 7567 - 7581
  • [29] Stochastic Dosimetry Assessment of the Human RF-EMF Exposure to 3D Beamforming Antennas in indoor 5G Networks
    Bonato, Marta
    Dossi, Laura
    Chiaramello, Emma
    Fiocchi, Serena
    Tognola, Gabriella
    Parazzini, Marta
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (04): : 1 - 14
  • [30] A Novel Machine Learning Scheme for mmWave Path Loss Modeling for 5G Communications in Dense Urban Scenarios
    Jin, Woobeen
    Kim, Hyeonjin
    Lee, Hyukjoon
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (12)