Cu-Cu Thermocompression Bonding with a Self-Assembled Monolayer as Oxidation Protection for 3D/2.5D System Integration

被引:2
|
作者
Lykova, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Panchenko, Iuliana [2 ,3 ]
Schneider-Ramelow, Martin [4 ]
Suga, Tadatomo [5 ,6 ]
Mu, Fengwen [6 ,7 ]
Buschbeck, Roy [8 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Elect Nanosyst ENAS, D-09126 Chemnitz, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Elect Packaging Technol IAVT, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[3] Fraunhofer Inst Reliabil & Microintegrat IZM, All Silicon Syst Integrat Dresden ASSID, D-01468 Dresden, Germany
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Reliabil & Microintegrat IZM, D-13355 Berlin, Germany
[5] Meisei Univ, Collaborat Res Ctr, Tokyo 1918506, Japan
[6] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Precis Engn, 7-3-1 Hongo,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[7] SABers Co Ltd, Tianjin 300450, Peoples R China
[8] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Ctr Microtechnol ZfM, D-09126 Chemnitz, Germany
关键词
Cu-Cu bonding; thermocompression bonding; self-assembled monolayers; SAM; SAM desorption; THERMAL-STABILITY; COPPER; PASSIVATION;
D O I
10.3390/mi14071365
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cu-Cu direct interconnects are highly desirable for the microelectronic industry as they allow for significant reductions in the size and spacing of microcontacts. The main challenge associated with using Cu is its tendency to rapidly oxidize in air. This research paper describes a method of Cu passivation using a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) to protect the surface against oxidation. However, this approach faces two main challenges: the degradation of the SAM at room temperature in the ambient atmosphere and the monolayer desorption technique prior to Cu-Cu bonding. In this paper, the systematic investigation of these challenges and their possible solutions are presented. The methods used in this study include thermocompression (TC) bonding, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), shear strength testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results indicate nearly no Cu oxidation (4 at.%) for samples with SAM passivation in contrast to the bare Cu surface (27 at.%) after the storage at -18 & DEG;C in a conventional freezer for three weeks. Significant improvement was observed in the TC bonding with SAM after storage. The mean shear strength of the passivated samples reached 65.5 MPa without storage. The average shear strength values before and after the storage tests were 43% greater for samples with SAM than for the bare Cu surface. In conclusion, this study shows that Cu-Cu bonding technology can be improved by using SAM as an oxidation inhibitor, leading to a higher interconnect quality.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Room Temperature Desorption of Self Assembly Monolayer (SAM) Passivated Cu for Lowering the Process Temperature Cu-Cu bonding of 3-D ICs
    Ghosh, Tarnal
    Dutta, Ashudeb
    Lingareddy, E.
    Subrabmanyam, Ch
    Singh, Shiv Govind
    2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING ELECTRONICS (ICEE), 2012,
  • [42] Cu-Cu Bonding using Optimized Copper Nitride Passivation for 3D Packaging Applications
    Park, Haesung
    Park, Seungmin
    Kim, Yoonho
    Kim, Sarah Eunkyung
    IITC2021: 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (IITC), 2021,
  • [43] Novel Hybrid Bonding Technology Using Ultra-High Density Cu Nano-Pillar for Exascale 2.5D/3D Integration
    Lee, Kangwook
    Bea, Jichel
    Fukushima, Takafumi
    Ramalingam, Suresh
    Wu, Xin
    Tanaka, Tetsu
    Koyanagi, Mitsumasa
    IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, 2016, 37 (01) : 81 - 83
  • [44] Foundry Perspectives on 2.5D/3D Integration and Roadmap
    Yu, Douglas C. H.
    Wang, Chuei-Tang
    Hsia, Harry
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING (IEDM), 2021,
  • [45] Cost Comparison between 3D and 2.5D Integration
    Velenis, Dimitrios
    Detalle, Mikael
    Civale, Yann
    Marinissen, Erik Jan
    Beyer, Gerald
    Beyne, Eric
    2012 4TH ELECTRONIC SYSTEM-INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ESTC), 2012,
  • [46] 3D SoC integration, beyond 2.5D chiplets
    Beyne, Eric
    Milojevic, Dragomir
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Beyer, Gerald
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES MEETING (IEDM), 2021,
  • [47] 2.5D and 3D Heterogeneous Integration: Emerging applications
    Sheikh F.
    Nagisetty R.
    Karnik T.
    Kehlet D.
    IEEE Solid-State Circuits Magazine, 2021, 13 (04): : 77 - 87
  • [48] 2.5D/3D Integration Technologies for Circuit Obfuscation
    Xie, Yang
    Bao, Chongxi
    Liu, Yuntao
    Srivastava, Ankur
    2016 17TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MICROPROCESSOR AND SOC TEST AND VERIFICATION (MTV), 2016, : 39 - 44
  • [49] Reliability Challenges for 2.5D/3D Integration: an Overview
    Premachandran, C. S.
    Choi, Seungman
    Cimino, Salvatore
    Thuy Tran-Quinn
    Burrell, Lloyd
    Justison, Patrick
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM (IRPS), 2018,
  • [50] Reliability Challenges in 2.5D and 3D IC Integration
    Li, Li
    Ton, Paul
    Nagar, Mohan
    Chia, Pierre
    2017 IEEE 67TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC 2017), 2017, : 1504 - 1509