Root resorption in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without maxillary premolar extractions

被引:1
|
作者
Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron [1 ,6 ]
da Silva, Aline Oliveira [2 ]
Maranhao, Olga Benario Vieira [2 ]
Barros, Sergio Estelita [3 ]
Niederberger, Ana [2 ]
Bellini-Pereira, Silvio Augusto [2 ]
Garib, Daniela [4 ,5 ]
Janson, Guilherme [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Div Orthodont, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, 1011 N Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; ANTERIOR RETRACTION; IRREGULARITY INDEX; INTRUSION; DISTALIZATION; EDGEWISE; PATIENT; SYSTEM; FORCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.024
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Class II malocclusion treatment efficiency with maxillary premolar extractions has been reported. However, no study evaluated the root resorption associated with this protocol. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the degree of root resorption of the maxillary incisors in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without maxillary premolar extractions.Methods: The sample consisted of 56 patients with complete Class II malocclusion, divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 28 patients (10 female, 18 male) treated with maxillary first premolar extractions, and group 2 was composed of 28 patients (16 female, 12 male) treated without extractions. The groups were matched regarding initial age, treatment time, crowding, initial malocclusion severity, finishing quality, initial overjet, and overbite. Periapical radiographs of the maxillary incisors were used to assess the degree of root resorption using a scoring system. In addition, treatment changes involving maxillary incisors were evaluated in lateral headfilms. Intergroup comparisons were performed with t, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests (P \0.05).Results: Overjet, overbite, inclination, vertical positional changes, and vertical and horizontal apical displacements of maxillary incisors were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding root resorption of maxillary incisors. Root resorption degree ranged from mild to moderate in both groups.Conclusions: Treating complete Class II malocclusion with 2 maxillary premolar extractions resulted in a similar root resorption as treating without maxillary premolar extractions. An individualized evaluation of root resorption predisposing factors should be performed for each patient.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 397
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols
    Janson, Guilherme
    Barros, Sergio Estelita Cavalcante
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha
    Pinzan, Arnaldo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 132 (04) : 490 - 498
  • [32] Root resorption of a maxillary permanent first molar by an impacted second premolar
    Tabiat-Pour, S.
    Newlyn, A.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2007, 202 (05) : 261 - 262
  • [33] ANGLE CLASS-II, DIVISION-1 MALOCCLUSION TREATED WITHOUT PREMOLAR EXTRACTION
    MCCULLOUGH, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 106 (03) : 317 - 321
  • [34] Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion
    de Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues
    Castanha Henriques, Jose Fernando
    de Almeida, Renato Rodrigues
    de Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (06) : 833 - 842
  • [35] Treatment of Class II malocclusion with tooth movement through the maxillary sinus
    Cha, Sa
    Zhang, Chengxiaoxue
    Zhao, Qing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 157 (01) : 105 - 116
  • [36] Nonextraction treatment of a Class II malocclusion and impacted maxillary central incisor
    Batterson, KD
    Curtis, T
    Parks, C
    Curtis, E
    Carlson, C
    Southard, TE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 125 (01) : 107 - 114
  • [37] Treatment times of Class II malocclusion: four premolar and non-extraction protocols
    Janson, Guilherme
    Valarelli, Danilo Pinelli
    Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 182 - 187
  • [38] Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment
    Tadic, Nevenka
    Woods, Michael G.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (05) : 808 - 816
  • [39] Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
    Paddenberg, Eva
    Braun, Maria Christina
    Proff, Peter
    Lippold, Carsten
    Kirschneck, Christian
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [40] Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
    Eva Paddenberg
    Maria Christina Braun
    Peter Proff
    Carsten Lippold
    Christian Kirschneck
    Head & Face Medicine, 19