Patient-reported outcomes in patients with vitreous floaters: A systematic literature review

被引:4
|
作者
Woudstra-de Jong, Jarinne E. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Manning-Charalampidou, Sonia S. [1 ,3 ]
Vingerling, Hans [4 ]
Busschbach, Jan J. [2 ]
Pesudovs, Konrad [5 ]
机构
[1] Rotterdam Eye Hosp, Rotterdam Ophthalm Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Psychiat, Sect Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Eye Hosp Rotterdam, Dept Vitreoretinal Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Ophthalmol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ New South Wales, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] POB 70030, NL-3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Vitreous; Floaters; Patient-reported outcome measures; Assessment; Quality of life; Visual functioning; Psychosocial health; PARS-PLANA VITRECTOMY; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; YAG VITREOLYSIS; HEALTH-STATUS; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; LASER VITREOLYSIS; SAFETY; EFFICACY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.06.003
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Seeking treatment for bothersome vitreous floaters is patient driven. To measure the impact of floaters and treatment on an individual's quality of life, patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are essential. We review all studies using a PROM for patients with floaters. We evaluated content coverage against quality-of-life domains previously identified in other ophthalmic disorders, and against a qualitative study investigating quality-of-life issues in patients with floaters. We assessed measurement properties of PROMs using an extensive range of psychometric quality criteria. We identified 59 studies using 28 different PROMs. Many PROMs were not specifically developed for patients with floaters. Floater-specific PROMs were mostly based on content validation from an ophthalmologist or researcher perspective; two included a patient perspective. Using the outcomes of the qualitative study, we found that the floater-specific PROMs were narrow in their content coverage, with most items relating to visual symptoms and activity limitations. Testing the psychometric quality of PROMs was rare, and when employed mostly limited to responsiveness and known group validity. The remarkable high number of floater-specific PROMs reveals a need for such mea-surements in ophthalmology. Unfortunately, reporting on psychometric quality is lim-ited, and content development is most often done without patient involvement.& COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 888
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review
    Kim, Ashley
    Chung, Karen C.
    Keir, Christopher
    Patrick, Donald L.
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Surgically Amenable Epiphora
    Schulz, Christopher B.
    Kennedy, Alasdair
    Rogers, Simon
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 34 (03): : 193 - 200
  • [43] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in retinal diseases: a systematic review
    Senthil, Mallika Prem
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (04) : 546 - 582
  • [44] Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review
    S Vandenbroeck
    S De Geest
    T Zeyen
    I Stalmans
    F Dobbels
    Eye, 2011, 25 : 555 - 577
  • [45] Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review
    Ashley Kim
    Karen C. Chung
    Christopher Keir
    Donald L. Patrick
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [46] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature
    Ziedas, Alexander
    Abed, Varag
    Bench, Carter
    Rahman, Tahsin
    Makhni, Melvin C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (04): : 646 - 659
  • [47] FOUR DECADES OF RASCH ANALYSIS ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES INSTRUMENTS VALIDATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    de Bock, E.
    Williams, P.
    Tugaut, B.
    Guillemin, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A362 - A362
  • [48] Hip Capsular Repair Results in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes and Survivorship: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Carbone, Andrew D.
    Prabhavalkar, Omkar
    Chishti, Zayd
    Curley, Andrew J.
    Parsa, Ali
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (02): : 488 - 497
  • [49] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward
    Snyder, Daniel J.
    Zilinyi, Robert S.
    Cohen, David J.
    Parikh, Sahil A.
    Sethi, Sanjum S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (23):
  • [50] MACHINE LEARNING AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) IN ONCOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY
    Krepper, D.
    Cesari, M.
    Hubel, N. J.
    Zelger, P.
    Sztankay, M. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S401 - S401