Treating Primary Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review of Available Treatment Options

被引:3
|
作者
Zuur, Lotte G. [1 ]
de Barros, Hilda A. [1 ]
van der Mijn, Koen J. C. [2 ]
Vis, Andre N. [3 ]
Bergman, Andries M. [2 ]
Pos, Floris J. [4 ]
van Moorselaar, Jeroen A. [3 ]
van der Poel, Henk G. [1 ,3 ]
Vogel, Wouter V. [4 ,5 ]
van Leeuwen, Pim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol Urol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Nucl Med, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate cancer; primary diagnosed; node-positive; metastasis; treatment; radiotherapy; androgen deprivation therapy; radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LOCAL TREATMENT; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; FOLLOW-UP; HIGH-RISK; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SURVIVAL; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15112962
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with a primary diagnosis of clinically and pathologically node-positive (cN1M0 and pN1M0) hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa). The treatment paradigm has shifted as research has shown that these patients could benefit from intensified treatment and are potentially curable. This scoping review provides an overview of available treatments for men with primary-diagnosed cN1M0 and pN1M0 PCa. A search was conducted on Medline for studies published between 2002 and 2022 that reported on treatment and outcomes among patients with cN1M0 and pN1M0 PCa. In total, twenty-seven eligible articles were included in this analysis: six randomised controlled trials, one systematic review, and twenty retrospective/observational studies. For cN1M0 PCa patients, the best-established treatment option is a combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) applied to both the prostate and lymph nodes. Based on most recent studies, treatment intensification can be beneficial, but more randomised studies are needed. For pN1M0 PCa patients, adjuvant or early salvage treatments based on risk stratification determined by factors such as Gleason score, tumour stage, number of positive lymph nodes, and surgical margins appear to be the best-established treatment options. These treatments include close monitoring and adjuvant treatment with ADT and/or EBRT.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Call for Level 1 Evidence
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2015, 29 (02): : 118 - +
  • [22] Toxicity and outcome of pelvic IMRT for node-positive prostate cancer
    Mueller, A. -C.
    Luetjens, J.
    Alber, M.
    Eckert, F.
    Bamberg, M.
    Schilling, D.
    Belka, C.
    Ganswindt, U.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (11) : 982 - 989
  • [23] Role of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
    Wong, Yu-Ning
    Freedland, Stephen
    Egleston, Brian
    Hudes, Gary
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Armstrong, Katrina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [24] Node-positive prostate cancer. Value of radical prostatectomy
    Heidenreich, A.
    Schrader, A. J.
    UROLOGE, 2010, 49 (10): : 1266 - 1273
  • [25] Management Options for Node-Positive Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Polimera, V.
    Bhatia, Priyanka
    Wheelden, Megan
    Perimbeti, Stuthi
    Warrick, Joshua
    Joshi, Monika
    Joshi, Monika
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (08) : 392 - 402
  • [26] Radiotherapy for node-positive prostate cancer correlates with improved survival
    Elumalai, T.
    Portner, R.
    Mariam, N. B. G.
    Young, T.
    Hughes, S.
    Wickramasinghe, K.
    Bhana, R.
    Jayaprakash, K. T.
    Sabar, M.
    Hudson, A.
    Hoskin, P.
    Mistry, H.
    Choudhury, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S481 - S483
  • [27] Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Localized or Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Removing the Primary
    Matulay, Justin T.
    DeCastro, G. Joel
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [28] Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Localized or Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Removing the Primary
    Justin T. Matulay
    G. Joel DeCastro
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [29] Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Valerio, Massimo
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Tsaur, Igor
    Mathieu, Romain
    Ceci, Francesco
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Thibault, Constance
    Ost, Piet
    Tilki, Derya
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Moschini, Marco
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Gontero, Paolo
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 565 - 581
  • [30] The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Gakis, Georgios
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Joniau, Steven
    Karazanashvili, Guram
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Mattei, Agostino
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Wirth, Manfred
    Stief, Christian G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) : 191 - 199