Critical Power and Respiratory Compensation Point Are Not Equivalent in Patients with COPD

被引:5
|
作者
Tiller, Nicholas B. [1 ]
Porszasz, Janos [1 ]
Casaburi, Richard [1 ]
Rossiter, Harry B. [1 ]
Ferguson, Carrie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Med Ctr, Inst Resp Med & Exercise Physiol, Lundquist Inst Biomed Innovat Harbor, Div Resp & Crit Care Physiol & Med, Torrance, CA USA
[2] UCLA Med Ctr, Lundquist Inst Biomed Innovat Harbor, 1124 W Carson St,CDCRC Bldg, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
EXERCISE; EXERCISE LIMITATION; LUNG FUNCTION; LUNG DISEASE; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; MUSCLE METABOLIC-RESPONSES; DURATION RELATIONSHIP; INTENSITY EXERCISE; AEROBIC FUNCTION; WORK CAPACITY; LIMIT; PARAMETERS; THRESHOLD; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0000000000003124
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
IntroductionSeveral studies report that pulmonary oxygen uptake (V?O-2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) is equivalent to the V?O-2 at critical power (CP), suggesting that the variables can be used interchangeably to demarcate the threshold between heavy and severe intensity domains. However, if RCP is a valid surrogate for CP, their values should correspond even when assessed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom the "normal" mechanisms linking CP and RCP are impeded. The aim of this study was to compare V?O-2 at CP with V?O-2 at RCP in patients with COPD.MethodsTwenty-two COPD patients (14 male/8 female; forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 46% +/- 17% pred) performed ramp-incremental cycle ergometry to intolerance (5-10 W center dot min(-1)) for the determination of gas exchange threshold (GET) and RCP. CP was calculated from the asymptote of the hyperbolic power-duration relationship from 3-5 constant-power exercise tests to intolerance. CP was validated with a 20-min constant-power ride.ResultsGET was identified in 20 of 22 patients at a V?O-2 of 0.93 +/- 0.18 L center dot min(-1) (75% +/- 13% V?O-2peak), whereas RCP was identified in just 3 of 22 patients at a V?O-2 of 1.40 +/- 0.39 L center dot min(-1) (85% +/- 2% V?O-2peak). All patients completed constant-power trials with no difference in peak physiological responses relative to ramp-incremental exercise (P > 0.05). CP was 46 +/- 22 W, which elicited a V?O-2 of 1.04 +/- 0.29 L center dot min(-1) (90% +/- 9% V?O-2peak) during the validation ride. The difference in V?O-2 at 15 and 20 min of the validation ride was 0.00 +/- 0.04 L, which was not different from a hypothesized mean of 0 (P = 0.856), thereby indicating a V?O-2 steady state.ConclusionsIn COPD patients, who present with cardiopulmonary and/or respiratory-mechanical dysfunction, CP can be determined in the absence of RCP. Accordingly, CP and RCP are not equivalent in this group.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Considerations for the Measurement of Respiratory Compensation Point and Critical Power in COPD
    Keir, Daniel A.
    Murias, Juan M.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2023, 55 (10) : 1940 - 1940
  • [2] Considerations for the Measurement of Respiratory Compensation Point and Critical Power in COPD - Response
    Ferguson, Carrie
    Tiller, Nicholas B.
    Porszasz, Janos
    Casaburi, Richard
    Rossiter, Harry B.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2023, 55 (10) : 1941 - 1941
  • [3] A Comparison Of Critical Power And Respiratory Compensation Point In COPD: Coincidence Or Equivalence?
    Ferguson, Carrie
    Porszasz, Janos
    Casaburi, Richard
    Abbasi, Asghar
    Rossiter, Harry B.
    Tiller, Nicholas B.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 538 - 538
  • [4] The Respiratory Compensation Point is Not a Valid Surrogate for Critical Power
    Leo, Jeffrey A.
    Sabapathy, Surendran
    Simmonds, Michael J.
    Cross, Troy J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (07): : 1452 - 1460
  • [5] The Respiratory Compensation Point Is Not A Valid Surrogate Of Critical Power
    Leo, Jeffery A.
    Cross, Troy J.
    Simmonds, Michael J.
    Sabapathy, Surendran
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 672 - 672
  • [6] Influence of pedal cadence on the respiratory compensation point and its relation to critical power
    Broxterman, R. M.
    Ade, C. J.
    Barker, T.
    Barstow, T. J.
    RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY, 2015, 208 : 1 - 7
  • [7] A comparison of critical power and the respiratory compensation point at slower and faster pedaling cadences
    Micheli, Lorenzo
    Teso, Massimo
    Guluzade, Nasimi A.
    Rizzo, Matteo
    Marini, Carlo Ferri
    Lucertini, Francesco
    Keir, Daniel A.
    Pogliaghi, Silvia
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2025, 50
  • [8] Work Performed Above The Respiratory Compensation Point Is Not Equivalent To W'
    Leo, Jeffrey A.
    Sabapathy, Surendran
    Simmonds, Michael J.
    Cross, Troy J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 407 - 407
  • [9] Utility of the Respiratory Compensation Point for Estimating Critical Power: Insights From Normoxia and Hypoxia
    Marwood, Simon
    Simpson, Len Parker
    Wilkerson, Daryl P.
    Jones, Andrew M.
    Goulding, Richie P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2025, 25 (05)
  • [10] The Relationship Between Critical Speed and the Respiratory Compensation Point
    Craig, Jesse C.
    Ade, Carl J.
    Broxterman, Ryan M.
    Wilcox, Samuel L.
    Schlup, Susanna J.
    Mendoza, Yojana
    Chavez, Luis
    Barstow, Thomas J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 666 - 666