Predicting the Productivity of Municipality Workers: A Comparison of Six Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Bijalwan, Priya [1 ]
Gupta, Ashulekha [1 ]
Mendiratta, Anubhav [1 ]
Johri, Amar [2 ]
Asif, Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Graph Era Univ, Dept Management Studies, Dehra Dun 248002, India
[2] Saudi Elect Univ, Coll Adm & Financial Sci, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia
关键词
machine learning; algorithms; productivity; municipality; workers; incentives;
D O I
10.3390/economies12010016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One of the most significant areas of local government in the world is the municipality sector. It provides various services to the residents and businesses in their areas, such as water supply, sewage disposal, healthcare, education, housing, and transport. Municipalities also promote social and economic development and ensure democratic and accountable governance. It also helps in encouraging the involvement of communities in local matters. Workers of Municipalities need to maintain their services regularly to the public. The productivity of the employees is just one of the main important factors that influence the overall organizational performance. This article compares various machine learning algorithms such as XG Boost, Random Forest (RF), Histogram Gradient Boosting Regressor, LGBM Regressor, Ada Boost Regressor, and Gradient Boosting Regressor on the dataset of municipality workers. The study aims to propose a machine learning approach to predict and evaluate the productivity of municipality workers. The evaluation of the overall targeted and actual productivity of each department shows that out of 12 different departments, only 5 departments were able to meet their targeted productivity. A 3D Scatter plot visually displays the incentive given by the department to each worker based on their productivity. The results show that XG Boost performs best in comparison with the other five algorithms, as the value of R Squared is 0.71 and MSE (Mean Squared Error) is 0.01.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gaining insight into toxicity predicting machine learning algorithms
    Allen, T. E. H.
    Gelzinyte, E.
    Wedlake, A. J.
    Goodman, J. M.
    Gutsell, S.
    Russell, P. J.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S280 - S280
  • [42] Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Hepatitis C
    Wang, Yunchuan
    Yin, Baohua
    Zhu, Qiang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MEDICINE SCIENCE, ISAIMS 2023, 2023, : 359 - 365
  • [43] Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Electricity Consumption of Buildings
    Soodeh Hosseini
    Reyhane Hafezi Fard
    [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, 121 : 3329 - 3341
  • [44] Impacts of Feature Selection on Predicting Machine Failures by Machine Learning Algorithms
    Bezerra, Francisco Elanio
    de Oliveira Neto, Geraldo Cardoso
    Cervi, Gabriel Magalhaes
    Mazetto, Rafaella Francesconi
    de Faria, Aline Mariane
    Vido, Marcos
    Lima, Gustavo Araujo
    de Araujo, Sidnei Alves
    Sampaio, Mauro
    Amorim, Marlene
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [45] Application of machine learning algorithms for prediction of sinter machine productivity[Formula presented]
    Mallick, Arpit
    Dhara, Subhra
    Rath, Sushant
    [J]. Machine Learning with Applications, 2021, 6
  • [46] Classification success of six machine learning algorithms in radar ornithology
    Rosa, Isabel M. D.
    Marques, Ana Teresa
    Palminha, Gustavo
    Costa, Hugo
    Mascarenhas, Miguel
    Fonseca, Carlos
    Bernardino, Joana
    [J]. IBIS, 2016, 158 (01) : 28 - 42
  • [47] Correction to: Predicting polypharmacy in half a million adults in the Iranian population: comparison of machine learning algorithms
    Maryam Seyedtabib
    Naser Kamyari
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [48] Personalized Prediction of Patient Radiation Exposure for Therapy of Urolithiasis: An Application and Comparison of Six Machine Learning Algorithms
    Huettenbrink, Clemens
    Hitzl, Wolfgang
    Distler, Florian
    Ell, Jascha
    Ammon, Josefin
    Pahernik, Sascha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [49] COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR BREAST CANCER
    Suryachandra, Palli
    Reddy, P. Venkata Subba
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT), VOL 3, 2015, : 439 - 444
  • [50] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Diabetes
    Costea, Naomi Estera
    Moisi, Elisa Valentina
    Popescu, Daniela Elena
    [J]. 2021 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING OF MODERN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS (EMES), 2021, : 56 - 59