Study on the influencing factors on indoor PM2.5 of office buildings in beijing based on statistical and machine learning methods

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Zehao [1 ]
Di, Zhenzhen [1 ]
Chang, Miao [1 ]
Zheng, Ji [1 ]
Tanaka, Toshio [2 ]
Kuroi, Kiyoshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Daikin Ind Ltd, Osaka 5308323, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING | 2023年 / 66卷
关键词
Indoor air quality; PM2; 5; Contribution; Office buildings; IoT devices; WINDOW-OPENING BEHAVIOR; OUTDOOR AIR-QUALITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; EXPOSURE; PARTICLES; POLLUTION; IMPACT; PENETRATION; OCCUPANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105240
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To investigate the interactions and contributions of the influencing factors on indoor PM2.5, indoor monitoring data (including PM2.5, CO2, temperature, humidity, and window states) at six office buildings sites in Beijing and outdoor air quality and meteorological data at nearby national sites were collected and analyzed. Seemingly unrelated estimation (SUEST) tests and decision tree models were conducted, and results indicated that opening windows increased the infiltration factor and decreased the impact of indoor sources, while it may not be effective enough to remove indoor particles in some conditions. Besides, the influence of factors is nonlinear, and the correlations between factors make the form of cross-terms complex. The contribution of outdoor PM2.5 and periodic factors adds up to 68.43 & PLUSMN; 6.07%, and the main differences among the results are reflected in the allocation of these factors. Outdoor PM2.5 is shown to play the most important role in the variation of indoor PM2.5 in most office spaces (49.55 & PLUSMN; 16.87%). Periodic factors and personnel activities are significant (16.34 & PLUSMN; 10.02%) and strong personnel activities seemed to increase the impact of periodic factors on indoor PM2.5, while the impact of window states is limited (3.41 & PLUSMN; 2.63%). The contribution of outdoor meteorology and indoor environment is 11.89 & PLUSMN; 2.63% and 16.26 & PLUSMN; 4.40% respectively. The influence of wind direction is stronger than that of wind speed, and temperature and humidity were shown to be equally important in the variation of indoor PM2.5. The data and results can provide suggestions for indoor air quality management, and the methods proposed in this study can be used to evaluate the impact of other factors on indoor air quality based on long-term monitoring data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatiotemporal change of PM2.5 concentration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its prediction based on machine learning
    Liu, Nanjian
    Hao, Zhixin
    Zhao, Peng
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2024, 58
  • [32] Characteristics and Relationships between Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 in Beijing: A Residential Apartment Case Study
    Han, Yingjie
    Li, Xinghua
    Zhu, Tianle
    Lv, Dong
    Chen, Ying
    Hou, Li'an
    Zhang, Yinping
    Ren, Mingzhong
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (10) : 2386 - 2395
  • [33] Predicting PM2.5 levels and exceedance days using machine learning methods
    Gao, Ziqi
    Do, Khanh
    Li, Zongrun
    Jiang, Xiangyu
    Maji, Kamal J.
    Ivey, Cesunica E.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 323
  • [34] Spatial association network of PM2.5 and its influencing factors in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration
    Huiping Wang
    Qi Ge
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 70541 - 70557
  • [35] A mathematical model for predicting indoor PM2.5 concentration under different ventilation methods in residential buildings
    Xie, Wei
    Fan, Yuesheng
    Zhang, Xin
    Tian, Guoji
    Si, Pengfei
    BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06): : 694 - 708
  • [36] Oxidative potential and chemical composition of PM2.5 in office buildings across Europe - The OFFICAIR study
    Szigeti, Tamas
    Dunster, Christina
    Cattaneo, Andrea
    Cavallo, Domenico
    Spinazze, Andrea
    Saraga, Dikaia E.
    Sakellaris, Ioannis A.
    de Kluizenaar, Yvonne
    Cornelissen, Eric J. M.
    Hanninen, Otto
    Peltonen, Matti
    Calzolai, Giulia
    Lucarelli, Franco
    Mandin, Corinne
    Bartzis, John G.
    Zaray, Gyula
    Kelly, Frank J.
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 92-93 : 324 - 333
  • [37] PM2.5 Concentration Influencing Factors in China Based on the Random Forest Model
    Xia X.-S.
    Chen J.-J.
    Wang J.-J.
    Cheng X.-F.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2020, 41 (05): : 2057 - 2065
  • [38] Interpreting Highly Variable Indoor PM2.5 in Rural North China Using Machine Learning
    Men, Yatai
    Li, Yaojie
    Luo, Zhihan
    Jiang, Ke
    Yi, Fan
    Liu, Xinlei
    Xing, Ran
    Cheng, Hefa
    Shen, Guofeng
    Tao, Shu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (46) : 18183 - 18192
  • [39] An intercomparison of weather normalization of PM2.5 concentration using traditional statistical methods, machine learning, and chemistry transport models
    Zheng, Huang
    Kong, Shaofei
    Zhai, Shixian
    Sun, Xiaoyun
    Cheng, Yi
    Yao, Liquan
    Song, Congbo
    Zheng, Zhonghua
    Shi, Zongbo
    Harrison, Roy M.
    NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [40] An intercomparison of weather normalization of PM2.5 concentration using traditional statistical methods, machine learning, and chemistry transport models
    Huang Zheng
    Shaofei Kong
    Shixian Zhai
    Xiaoyun Sun
    Yi Cheng
    Liquan Yao
    Congbo Song
    Zhonghua Zheng
    Zongbo Shi
    Roy M. Harrison
    npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6