Robustness of quantum algorithms against coherent control errors

被引:6
|
作者
Berberich, Julian [1 ]
Fink, Daniel [2 ]
Holm, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Syst Theory & Automat Control, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Computat Phys, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
current noisy intermediate -scale quantum (NISQ) era [3]. In; CORRECTING CODES;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.109.012417
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Coherent control errors, for which ideal Hamiltonians are perturbed by unknown multiplicative noise terms, are a major obstacle for reliable quantum computing. In this paper we present a framework for analyzing the robustness of quantum algorithms against coherent control errors using Lipschitz bounds. We derive worstcase fidelity bounds which show that the resilience against coherent control errors is mainly influenced by the norms of the Hamiltonians generating the individual gates. These bounds are explicitly computable even for large circuits and they can be used to guarantee fault tolerance via threshold theorems. Moreover, we apply our theoretical framework to derive a guideline for robust quantum algorithm design and transpilation, which amounts to reducing the norms of the Hamiltonians. Using the three-qubit quantum Fourier transform as an example application, we demonstrate that this guideline targets robustness more effectively than existing ones based on circuit depth or gate count. Furthermore, we apply our framework to study the effect of parameter regularization in variational quantum algorithms. The practicality of the theoretical results is demonstrated via implementations in simulation and on a quantum computer.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive wideband beamforming with robustness against presteering errors
    El-Keyi, Amr
    Kirubarajan, Thia
    Gershman, Alex. B.
    2006 IEEE SENSOR ARRAY AND MULTICHANNEL SIGNAL PROCESSING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 11 - +
  • [32] Robustness of coherent control with light induced potentials
    Garraway, BM
    Suominen, KA
    FORTSCHRITTE DER PHYSIK-PROGRESS OF PHYSICS, 2003, 51 (2-3): : 128 - 134
  • [33] Quantum state tomography of large nuclear spins in a semiconductor quantum well: Optimal robustness against errors as quantified by condition numbers
    Miranowicz, Adam
    Oezdemir, Sahin K.
    Bajer, Jiri
    Yusa, Go
    Imoto, Nobuyuki
    Hirayama, Yoshiro
    Nori, Franco
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2015, 92 (07)
  • [34] On the Robustness of Face Recognition Algorithms Against Attacks and Bias
    Singh, Richa
    Agarwal, Akshay
    Singh, Maneet
    Nagpal, Shruti
    Vatsa, Mayank
    THIRTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THE THIRTY-SECOND INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE AND THE TENTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 34 : 13583 - 13589
  • [35] Adaptive beamforming algorithms with robustness against jammer motion
    Gershman, AB
    Nickel, U
    Bohme, JF
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1997, 45 (07) : 1878 - 1885
  • [36] Robustness of operator quantum error correction with respect to initialization errors
    Oreshkov, Ognyan
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2008, 77 (03):
  • [37] Robustness of Polarimetric Detection Algorithms Against Steering Mismatches
    Kovalenko, Vsevolod
    van Genderen, Piet
    2008 EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE, 2008, : 220 - 223
  • [38] Notes on the Robustness of Regression Trees Against Skewed and Contaminated Errors
    Galimberti, Giuliano
    Pillati, Marilena
    Soffritti, Gabriele
    NEW PERSPECTIVES IN STATISTICAL MODELING AND DATA ANALYSIS, 2011, : 255 - 263
  • [39] Robustness of quantum Grover algorithm against decoherence
    Salas, Pedro J.
    Gomez-Gonzalez, A.
    FRONTIERS OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICS, 2007, 905 : 261 - 261
  • [40] Robustness of quantum critical pairing against disorder
    Kang, Jian
    Fernandes, Rafael M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2016, 93 (22)