Cheating robot games

被引:0
|
作者
Huggan, Melissa A. [1 ]
Nowakowski, Richard J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vancouver Isl Univ, Dept Math, Nanaimo, BC, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Halifax, NS, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Combinatorial game theory; Cheating robot games; Approximations to simultaneous games; Weighted matchings;
D O I
10.1007/s00182-023-00862-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cheating Robot games are two-player, perfect information games which formalize ideas present in two different areas of combinatorial games. The games are based on simultaneous-play but where one player (Right=Robot) has reflexes fast enough both to see where the opponent will play and to respond. This changes a simultaneous game into a sequential game but which is not covered by the theory of normal-play games. A position in a Cheating Robot game is a finite, complete bipartite graph where the edges are labeled. The vertices represent moves, and the edge labels are the subsequent positions resulting from the choice of vertices. In a position, Left chooses a vertex first, Right second, and then play moves to the new position corresponding to the edge label. This is a 'round'. This paper will only consider games in which, from any position, every sequence of moves terminates after a finite number of rounds. In a terminal game, the player with a move is the winner, if there are no moves the game is a draw. The basic theory and properties are developed, including showing that there is an equivalence relation and partial order on the games. Whilst there are no inverses in the class of all games, we show that there is a sub-class, simple hot games, in which the integers have inverses. In this sub-class, the optimal strategies are obtained by the solutions to a minimum-weight matching problem on a graph whose number of vertices equals the number of summands in the disjunctive sum.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CHEATING IN EVOLUTIONARY GAMES
    ROSE, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1978, 75 (01) : 21 - 34
  • [2] ON THE CHEATING PROBLEM IN STACKELBERG GAMES
    HAMALAINEN, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1981, 12 (06) : 753 - 770
  • [3] An Investigation of Cheating in Online Games
    Yan, Jeff
    Randell, Brian
    [J]. IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2009, 7 (03) : 37 - 44
  • [4] Cheating in social network games
    Vazquez, Irene Serrano
    Consalvo, Mia
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2015, 17 (06) : 829 - 844
  • [5] No Fair!! An Interaction with a Cheating Robot
    Short, Elaine
    Hart, Justin
    Vu, Michelle
    Scassellati, Brian
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI 2010), 2010, : 219 - 226
  • [6] Can a robot invigilator prevent cheating?
    Mubin, Omar
    Cappuccio, Massimiliano
    Alnajjar, Fady
    Ahmad, Muneeb Imtiaz
    Shahid, Suleman
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 (04) : 981 - 989
  • [7] Does sex with a robot count as cheating?
    Whyte, Chelsea
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 240 (3207) : 16 - 16
  • [8] Cheating and Creativity in Pervasive Games in Learning Contexts
    Ejsing-Duun, Stine
    Hanghoj, Thorkild
    Karoff, Helle Skovbjerg
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 149 - 155
  • [9] Cheating, Social Network Games & The Role of Platforms
    Consalvo, Mia
    Vazquez, Irene Serrano
    [J]. 2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 1687 - 1694
  • [10] Cheating in mind games: The subtlety of rules matters
    Jiang, Ting
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2013, 93 : 328 - 336