Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Petov, Vladislav [1 ]
Azilgareeva, Camilla [1 ]
Shpikina, Anastasia [1 ]
Morozov, Andrey [1 ]
Krupinov, German [1 ]
Kozlov, Vasiliy [2 ]
Singla, Nirmish [3 ,4 ]
Gomez Rivas, Juan [5 ,6 ]
Jesus, Moreno-Sierra [5 ]
Puliatti, Stefano [6 ,7 ]
Checcucci, Enrico [6 ,8 ]
Rodler, Severin [6 ,9 ]
Belenchon, Ines Rivero [6 ,10 ]
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [6 ,11 ]
Veccia, Alessandro [6 ,12 ]
Mcfarland, Jonathan [13 ,14 ]
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. [6 ,15 ,16 ]
Taratkin, Mark [1 ,6 ]
Enikeev, Dmitry [1 ]
机构
[1] Sechenov Univ, Inst Urol & Reprod Hlth, Moscow 119991, Russia
[2] Sechenov Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Healthcare, Moscow 119991, Russia
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Dept Oncol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[5] Clin San Carlos Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Madrid 28040, Spain
[6] European Assoc Urol, Young Acad Urologists YAU Working Grp Urotechnol, NL-3001 Arnhem, Netherlands
[7] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Urol Dept, I-42121 Modena, Italy
[8] FPO IRCCS, Candiolo Canc Inst, Dept Surg, I-10060 Turin, Italy
[9] Klinikum Univ Munchen, Dept Urol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[10] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[11] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Urol, D-69047 Heidelberg, Germany
[12] Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Urol Unit, I-37126 Verona, Italy
[13] Sechenov Univ, Inst Linguist & Intercultural Commun, Moscow 123242, Russia
[14] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Med, Madrid 28029, Spain
[15] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[16] Univ Southern Calif, USC Inst Urol, Artificial Intelligence Ctr USC Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
systematic review; meta-analysis; robot-assisted prostate biopsy; MR-targeted biopsy; prostate cancer; ULTRASOUND FUSION; IN-BORE; FEASIBILITY; CANCER; SAFETY; COMPLICATIONS; INTERVENTION; MANIPULATOR; DEVICE;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15041181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I-2 = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I-2 = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and "per patient" did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I-2 = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I-2 = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate "per patient" between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I-2 = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate "per core" [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I-2 = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The added value of side specific systematic biopsy in patients diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy
    Bourgeno, H. A.
    Jabbour, T.
    Baudewyns, A.
    Simone, G.
    Fourcade, A.
    Fournier, G.
    Oderda, M.
    Gontero, P.
    Bernal-Gomez, A.
    Roche, J. B.
    Abou Zahr, R.
    Ploussard, G.
    Fiard, G.
    Halinski, A.
    Rysankova, K.
    Dariane, C.
    Anract, J.
    Taha, F.
    Windish, O.
    Assenmacher, G.
    Guenzel, K.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    Diamand, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S761 - S762
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    E. J. Bass
    A. Pantovic
    M. J. Connor
    S. Loeb
    A. R. Rastinehad
    M. Winkler
    Rhian Gabe
    H. U. Ahmed
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2022, 25 : 174 - 179
  • [23] A systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wang, Yi
    Zhao, Xudong
    Song, Yanjing
    Cai, Aizhen
    Xi, Hongqing
    Chen, Lin
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (48)
  • [24] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bass, E. J.
    Pantovic, A.
    Connor, M. J.
    Loeb, S.
    Rastinehad, A. R.
    Winkler, M.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Ahmed, H. U.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2022, 25 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [25] Robot-assisted versus open hepatectomy for liver tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xue, Qian
    Wu, Jianping
    Lei, Zehua
    Wang, Qing
    Fu, Jinqiang
    Gao, Fengwei
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (03) : 282 - 288
  • [26] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic major hepatectomies: Systematic review with meta-analysis
    Coletta, Diego
    Sandri, Giovanni Battista Levi
    Giuliani, Giuseppe
    Guerra, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (03):
  • [27] Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xia, Leilei
    Zhang, Xiaohua
    Wang, Xianjin
    Xu, Tianyuan
    Qin, Liang
    Zhang, Xiang
    Zhong, Shan
    Shen, Zhoujun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 30 : 109 - 115
  • [28] Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shrivastava, Nikita
    Bhargava, Priyank
    Sharma, Gopal
    Choudhary, Gautam Ram
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [29] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Cao, Gaoyang
    Mao, Weifang
    Lao, Weifeng
    He, Chao
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (05) : 979 - 989
  • [30] Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Approach for Splenectomy in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghidini, Filippo
    Bisoffi, Silvia
    Gamba, Piergiorgio
    Fascetti Leon, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (11): : 1203 - 1210