Lithologic Controls on Parameters of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model and Runoff Characteristics: A Case Study of the Xinanjiang Model

被引:0
|
作者
Meng, Xianmeng [1 ]
Zhao, Qi [1 ]
Cai, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Yin, Maosheng [2 ]
Liu, Dengfeng [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, 68, Jincheng St, Wuhan 430078, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Univ of Sci & Technol, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, 1088, Xueyuan Rd, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Univ Technol, Sch Water Resources & Hydropower, 5, Jinhua South Rd, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lithologic control; Parameters; Runoff characteristics; Xinanjiang model; Geological characteristic value; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; CATCHMENT CLASSIFICATION; GAUGE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; REGIONALIZATION; GEOLOGY; SOIL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION;
D O I
10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates lithologic control on parameters of the conceptual rainfall-runoff model and runoff characteristics through the construction of Xinanjiang rainfall-runoff models in different subwatersheds with different lithologies located in the Xiangxihe River watershed. The Xinanjiang models are calibrated based on a genetic algorithm and validated using the observed data. All the simulations for these four subwatersheds have NSE values larger than 0.8 during the calibration period and NSE values larger than 0.7 during the validation period. Root mean square error (RMSE) values range from 0.030 to 2.780 m(3)/s. Compared with the other three subwatersheds dominated by limestone and dolomite, Gaojiaping subwatershed mainly composed of granite is characterized by the significantly smaller areal mean free water storage capacity and larger outflow coefficient of free water storage to the interflow. Gaojiaping subwatershed has a dramatically higher-level surface runoff proportion and a remarkably lower-level groundwater runoff proportion than the other three subwatersheds-Sanchakou, Cangpinghe, and Xiangguxi subwatersheds. The concept of a geological characteristic value of watershed is proposed to reflect the water-bearing property of rock stratum for the whole watershed through an area-weighted average. This geological characteristic value in the karst subwatershed is larger than that of the nonkarst subwatershed. The relationships between the parameters of the Xinanjiang model and the geological characteristic values are obtained, and the variation of four categories of parameters with the geological characteristic values is analyzed. The surface runoff proportion and groundwater runoff proportion are negatively and positively correlated with the geological characteristic value, respectively. The established empirical equations can well reflect the relations between the geological characteristic values and runoff proportions. The importance of this finding emerges from the direct link between the index of hydrogeological survey in hydrogeology and proportions of different runoff components, providing a simple and effective way for water resources assessment in ungauged watersheds.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Joint Optimization of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Parameters and Weights Attributed to Meteorological Stations
    Adam P. Piotrowski
    Marzena Osuch
    Jarosław J. Napiorkowski
    Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 4509 - 4524
  • [22] A Bayesian method for missing rainfall estimation using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model
    Sun, Siao
    Leonhardt, Guenther
    Sandoval, Santiago
    Bertrand-Krajewski, Jean-Luc
    Rauch, Wolfgang
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2017, 62 (15): : 2456 - 2468
  • [23] REGIONAL MONTHLY RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL
    MIMIKOU, M
    RAO, AR
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1983, 109 (01): : 75 - 93
  • [24] A robust rainfall-runoff transfer model
    Capkun, G
    Davison, AC
    Musy, A
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (12) : 3207 - 3216
  • [25] THE TANK MODEL IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING
    PHIEN, HN
    PRADHAN, PSS
    WATER SA, 1983, 9 (03) : 93 - 102
  • [26] SIMPLE NONLINEAR RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL
    Basha, H. A.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 5 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [27] EVALUATING RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL PERFORMANCE
    MOORE, ID
    MEIN, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1976, 102 (09): : 1390 - 1395
  • [28] Assessing the Uncertainty of the Xinanjiang Rainfall-Runoff Model: Effect of the Likelihood Function Choice on the GLUE Method
    Alazzy, Alaa Alden
    Lue, Haishen
    Zhu, Yonghua
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (10)
  • [29] The use of gis to estimate hydrological parameters in a rainfall-runoff model
    ArdilesLopez, L
    FerrerJulia, M
    RodriguezChaparro, J
    GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION - FROM RESEARCH TO APPLICATION THROUGH COOPERATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 408 - 417
  • [30] A rainfall-runoff model parameterized from GIS and runoff data
    Skaugen, Thomas
    Onof, Christian
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (15) : 4529 - 4542