A Polynomial-Affine Approximation for Dynamic Portfolio Choice

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Yichen [1 ]
Escobar-Anel, Marcos [1 ]
Davison, Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamic programming; Quadratic-Affine processes; Expected utility; Portfolio optimization; Stochastic interest rates; Stochastic volatility; STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY; NUMERICAL-SOLUTIONS; OPTIMAL INVESTMENT; CONSUMPTION; OPTIONS; SIMULATION; SELECTION; MODEL; RISK; BOND;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-022-10297-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an efficient and accurate simulation-based method to approximate the solution of a continuous-time dynamic portfolio optimization problem for multi-asset and multi-state variables within expected utility theory. The performance of this methodology is demonstrated in five settings of a risky asset. Closed-form solutions are available for three of these settings-a geometric Brownian motion, a stochastic volatility model, and an exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process-which help assess performance. The fourth setting is a discrete-time vector autoregressive parametrization, which is popular in this area of research. In these cases, we compare our method to at least two relevant benchmarks in the literature: the BGSS methodology of Brandt et al. (Rev Financ Stud 18(3):831-873, 2005) and the SGBM approach of Cong and Oosterlee (Comput Econ 49(3):433-458, 2017) . Our method delivers accurate and fast results for the optimal investment and value function, comparable to analytical solutions. Moreover, it is also significantly faster for a given precision level than the aforementioned competing simulation-based methodologies. Lastly, we explore the solution to a model with mean-reverting SV and interest rate, under full correlation; this last assumption makes it unsolvable in closed-form. Our analysis shows a significant impact of correlation between stock and interest rate on allocation and annualized certainty equivalent rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1213
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] DYNAMIC MODELLING AND CONTROL OF A COMPRESSOR USING CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION
    Zagorowska, Marta
    Thornhill, Nina
    Skourup, Charlotte
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 6, 2018,
  • [43] Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Schemes for Stochastic Dynamic Programs
    Halman, Nir
    Klabjan, Diego
    Li, Chung-Lim
    Orlin, James
    Simchi-Levi, David
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2008, : 700 - +
  • [44] Polynomial Approximation of the Maximum Dynamic Error Generated by Measurement Systems
    Tomczyk, Krzysztof
    [J]. PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2019, 95 (06): : 124 - 127
  • [45] FULLY POLYNOMIAL TIME APPROXIMATION SCHEMES FOR STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMS
    Halman, Nir
    Klabjan, Diego
    Li, Chung-Lun
    Orlin, James
    Simchi-Levi, David
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2014, 28 (04) : 1725 - 1796
  • [46] A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach Based on Bounded Rationality and Application to Dynamic Portfolio Choice
    Bi, Wenjie
    Tian, Liuqing
    Liu, Haiying
    Chen, Xiaohong
    [J]. DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2014, 2014
  • [47] Dynamic portfolio selection with higher moments risk based on polynomial goal programming
    Xu Qi-fa
    Jiang Cui-xia
    Kang Pu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (14TH) VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 2152 - +
  • [48] Dynamic portfolio allocation, the dual theory of choice and probability distortion functions
    Hamada, Mahmoud
    Sherris, Michael
    Van Der Hoek, John
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2006, 36 (01): : 187 - 217
  • [49] Home bias and high turnover: Dynamic portfolio choice with incomplete markets
    Hnatkovska, Viktoria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 80 (01) : 113 - 128
  • [50] Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting
    De Giorgi, Enrico G.
    Legg, Shane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2012, 36 (07): : 951 - 972