The ophthalmology residency match: a new era

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Benjamin R. [1 ]
Sridhar, Jayanth [1 ]
Uhler, Tara [2 ]
机构
[1] Bascom Palmer Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Miami, FL USA
[2] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
application; holistic review; inequities; residency match; signalling; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/ICU.0000000000000973
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose of reviewThe average number of applications per ophthalmology residency applicant continues to rise. The present article reviews the history and negative impacts of this trend, the dearth of effective solutions and the potential promise of preference signalling as an alternative strategy to address this and potentially improve match outcomes.Recent findingsApplication inflation adversely impacts applicants and programmes and undermines holistic review. Most recommendations to limit volume have been largely unsuccessful or undesirable. Preference signalling does not restrict applications. Early results from initial pilots in other specialties are promising. Signalling has the potential to facilitate holistic review, reduce interview hoarding and promote equitable distribution of interviews.Preliminary data suggest preference signalling could be a useful strategy to address current issues with the Match. Building upon the blueprints and experiences of our colleagues, Ophthalmology should conduct its own investigation and consider a pilot project.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 377
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers in Ophthalmology Residency Applications for Students Identifying as Underrepresented in Medicine: A San Francisco Match Analysis
    Maru, Johsias A.
    Wang, Jiangxia
    Knight, O'Rese J.
    Tsou, Brittany C.
    Oatts, Julius T.
    Ross, David A.
    Moore, Edward Z.
    Zhang, Alice Yang
    Ramanathan, Saras
    Woreta, Fasika A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (07) : 971 - 980
  • [22] OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENCY APPOINTMENTS
    MAUMENEE, AE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1968, 66 (06) : 1181 - &
  • [23] Exploring Recent Changes to the New Urology Residency Match
    Alvarez-Suarez, Armando
    Shain, Spencer
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Juan Sebastian
    Munoz-Lopez, Carlos
    Miranda, Andre F.
    Hudak, Steven J.
    Campbell, Steven C.
    Dewitt-Foy, Molly E.
    Han, Justin
    Khouri Jr, Roger K.
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2024, 11 (06)
  • [24] Quantifying the Surgical Residency Match in the Zoom Era: Applicant Volume, Match Rates, and Where We Go Next
    Havlik, John L.
    Dey, Pranam
    Yoo, Peter S.
    Ahuja, Nita
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S231 - S231
  • [25] A New Era for Residency Training in Internal Medicine
    Fazio, Sara B.
    Steinmann, Alwin F.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (02) : 161 - 162
  • [26] Preference Signaling and Virtual Interviews: The New Urology Residency Match
    Carpinito, Gianpaolo P.
    Badia, Rohit R.
    Khouri, Roger K.
    Ganesan, Vishnu
    Kenigsberg, Alexander P.
    Hudak, Steven J.
    Lemack, Gary E.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 35 - 40
  • [27] The residency review committee for ophthalmology
    Lessell, S
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 114 (08) : 1002 - 1004
  • [28] Misrepresentation by Ophthalmology Residency Applicants
    Wiggins, Michael N.
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 128 (07) : 906 - 910
  • [29] SUGGESTIONS FOR OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENCY DIRECTORS
    LAM, B
    MORLEY, M
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 104 (06) : 802 - 802
  • [30] Twitter Footprint and the Match in the COVID-19 Era: Understanding the Relationship between Applicant Online Activity and Residency Match Success
    Bukavina, Laura
    Dubin, Justin
    Isali, Ilaha
    Calaway, Adam
    Mortach, Sherry
    Loeb, Stacy
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Mishra, Kirtishri
    Sindhani, Mohit
    Adan, Francoise
    Ponsky, Lee
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 9 (04) : 331 - 338