Faster Supervised Average Consensus in Adversarial and Stochastic Anonymous Dynamic Networks

被引:0
|
作者
Kamenev, Aleksandar [1 ]
Kowalski, Dariusz R. [2 ]
Mosteiro, Miguel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pace Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Seidenberg Sch CSIS, 1 Pace Plaza, New York, NY 10038 USA
[2] AUGUSTA Univ, Sch Comp & Cyber Sci, 100 Grace Hopper Lane,RV-1600, Augusta, GA 30901 USA
关键词
Anonymous Dynamic Networks; stochastic dynamic networks; counting; network consensus; algebraic computations; COMPUTATION; PROTOCOL; AGENTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1145/3593426
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
How do we reach consensus on an average value in a dynamic crowd without revealing identity? In this work, we study the problem of average network consensus in Anonymous Dynamic Networks (ADN). Network dynamicity is specified by the sequence of topology-graph isoperimetric numbers occurring over time, which we call the isoperimetric dynamicity of the network. The consensus variable is the average of values initially held by nodes, which is customary in the network-consensus literature. Given that having an algorithm to compute the average one can compute the network size (i.e., the counting problem) and vice versa, we focus on the latter. We present a deterministic distributed average network consensus algorithm for ADNs that we call isoperimetric Scalable Coordinated Anonymous Local Aggregation, and we analyze its performance for different scenarios, including worst-case (adversarial) and stochastic dynamic topologies. Our solution utilizes supervisor nodes, which have been shown to be necessary for computations in ADNs. The algorithm uses the isoperimetric dynamicity of the network as an input, meaning that only the isoperimetric number parameters (or their lower bound) must be given, but topologies may occur arbitrarily or stochastically as long as they comply with those parameters. Previous work for adversarial ADNs overestimates the running time to deal with worst-case scenarios. For ADNs with given isoperimetric dynamicity, our analysis shows improved performance for some practical dynamic topologies, with cubic time or better for stochastic ADNs, and our experimental evaluation indicates that our theoretical bounds could not be substantially improved for some models of dynamic networks.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Faster Exact-Counting Protocol for Anonymous Dynamic Networks
    Chakraborty, Maitri
    Milani, Alessia
    Mosteiro, Miguel A.
    ALGORITHMICA, 2018, 80 (11) : 3023 - 3049
  • [2] A Faster Exact-Counting Protocol for Anonymous Dynamic Networks
    Maitri Chakraborty
    Alessia Milani
    Miguel A. Mosteiro
    Algorithmica, 2018, 80 : 3023 - 3049
  • [3] Distributed Dynamic Average Consensus in Asymmetric Networks
    Asadi, Mohammad Mehdi
    Blouin, Stephane
    Aghdam, Amir G.
    2018 ANNUAL AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2018, : 864 - 869
  • [4] Dynamic average consensus on synchronous communication networks
    Zhu, Minghui
    Martinez, Sonia
    2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 4382 - 4387
  • [5] Average Consensus and Gossip Algorithms in Networks with Stochastic Asymmetric Communications
    Antunes, Duarte
    Silvestre, Daniel
    Silvestre, Carlos
    2011 50TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL AND EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC-ECC), 2011, : 2088 - 2093
  • [6] ADMM for Dynamic Average Consensus over Imperfect Networks
    Bastianello, Nicola
    Carli, Ruggero
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (13): : 228 - 233
  • [7] Asymmetric Mixing Matrix Optimization for Faster Average Consensus in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Jiang, Miao
    Li, Yiqing
    IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11 (20) : 34035 - 34047
  • [8] Large Networks of Dynamic Agents: Consensus under Adversarial Disturbances
    Bauso, Dario
    Basar, Tamer
    2012 CONFERENCE RECORD OF THE FORTY SIXTH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS (ASILOMAR), 2012, : 714 - 718
  • [9] Dynamic Min and Max Consensus and Size Estimation of Anonymous Multiagent Networks
    Deplano, Diego
    Franceschelli, Mauro
    Giua, Alessandro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2023, 68 (01) : 202 - 213
  • [10] Is ADMM always faster than Average Consensus?
    Bof, Nicoletta
    Carli, Ruggero
    Schenato, Luca
    AUTOMATICA, 2018, 91 : 311 - 315