REstrictive versus StandarD FlUid Management in Mechanically Ventilated ChildrEn Admitted to PICU: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial (REDUCE-1)

被引:1
|
作者
Raman, Sainath [1 ,2 ]
Rahiman, Sarfaraz [2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, Melanie [4 ]
Mattke, Adrian [2 ,3 ]
Venugopal, Prem [5 ,6 ]
McBride, Craig [7 ]
Tu, Quyen [8 ,9 ]
Zapf, Florian [10 ]
Kuhlwein, Eva [10 ]
Woodgate, Jemma [11 ]
Singh, Puneet [12 ]
Schlapbach, Luregn J. [1 ,10 ]
Gibbons, Kristen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Child Hlth Res Ctr, Childrens Intens Care Res Program, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Paediat Intens Care, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Child Hlth Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Gen Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Dept Pharm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] Univ Queensland, UQ Ctr Clin Res, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[10] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Dept Intens Care & Neonatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[11] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Dept Dietet, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[12] Sydney Childrens Hosp Randwick, Paediat Intens Care, Randwick, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
paediatric intensive & critical care; feasibility studies; randomized controlled trial; clinical trials; CRITICALLY-ILL CHILDREN; SERUM CREATININE; POOR OUTCOMES; OVERLOAD; MORTALITY; RESUSCITATION; ASSOCIATION; MORBIDITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intravenous fluid therapy is the most common intervention in critically ill children. There is an increasing body of evidence questioning the safety of high-volume intravenous fluid administration in these patients. To date, the optimal fluid management strategy remains unclear. We aimed to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing a restrictive with a standard (liberal) fluid management strategy in critically ill children. Methods and analysis Multicentre, binational pilot, randomised, controlled, open-label, pragmatic trial. Patients <18 years admitted to paediatric intensive care unit and mechanically ventilated at the time of screening are eligible. Patients with tumour lysis syndrome, diabetic ketoacidosis or postorgan transplant are excluded. Interventions: 1:1 random assignment of 154 individual patients into two groups-restrictive versus standard, liberal, fluid strategy-stratified by primary diagnosis (cardiac/non-cardiac). The intervention consists of a restrictive fluid bundle, including lower maintenance fluid allowance, limiting fluid boluses, reducing volumes of drug delivery and initiating diuretics or peritoneal dialysis earlier. The intervention is applied for 48 hours postrandomisation or until discharge (whichever is earlier). Endpoints: The number of patients recruited per month and proportion of recruited to eligible patients are feasibility endpoints. New-onset acute kidney injury and the incidence of clinically relevant central venous thrombosis are safety endpoints. Fluid balance at 48 hours after randomisation is the efficacy endpoint. Survival free of paediatric intensive care censored at 28 days is the clinical endpoint. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was gained from the Children's Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/21/QCHQ/77514, date: 1 September 2021), and University of Zurich (2021-02447, date: 17 March 2023). The trial is registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001311842). Open-access publication in high impact peer-reviewed journals will be sought. Modern information dissemination strategies will also be used including social media to disseminate the outcomes of the study. Trial registration number ACTRN12621001311842. Protocol version/date V5/23 May 2023.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A GASTROINTESTINAL CARE BUNDLE VERSUS STANDARD CARE TO REDUCE THE GASTROINTESTINAL EFFECTS OF PELVIC CHEMORADIOTHERAPY: A PILOT FEASIBILITY RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    White, K. L.
    Henson, C. C.
    Hann, M.
    Eden, M.
    Burden, S.
    Lal, S.
    Davidson, S. E.
    McLaughlin, J.
    GUT, 2017, 66 : A197 - A198
  • [22] A comparison of earlier and enhanced rehabilitation of mechanically ventilated patients in critical care compared to standard care (REHAB): Study protocol for a single-site randomised controlled feasibility trial
    Snelson C.
    Jones C.
    Atkins G.
    Hodson J.
    Whitehouse T.
    Veenith T.
    Thickett D.
    Reeves E.
    McLaughlin A.
    Cooper L.
    McWilliams D.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 3 (1)
  • [23] Automated versus manual oxygen administration for patients admitted with acute cardiovascular disease - a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Taraldsen, Ida Arentz
    Grand, Johannes
    Lukoschewitz, Jasmin Dam
    Hansen, Ejvind Frausing
    Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 70 (04):
  • [24] 0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU-a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial
    Raman, Sainath
    Schibler, Andreas
    Marsney, Renate Le
    Trnka, Peter
    Kennedy, Melanie
    Mattke, Adrian
    Gibbons, Kristen
    Schlapbach, Luregn J.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [25] REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Stephen P. J. Macdonald
    David McD Taylor
    Gerben Keijzers
    Glenn Arendts
    Daniel M. Fatovich
    Frances B. Kinnear
    Simon G. A. Brown
    Rinaldo Bellomo
    Sally Burrows
    John F. Fraser
    Edward Litton
    Juan Carlos Ascencio-Lane
    Matthew Anstey
    David McCutcheon
    Lisa Smart
    Ioana Vlad
    James Winearls
    Bradley Wibrow
    Trials, 18
  • [26] REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Macdonald, Stephen P. J.
    Taylor, David Mcd
    Keijzers, Gerben
    Arendts, Glenn
    Fatovich, Daniel M.
    Kinnear, Frances B.
    Brown, Simon G. A.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Burrows, Sally
    Fraser, John F.
    Litton, Edward
    Ascencio-Lane, Juan Carlos
    Anstey, Matthew
    McCutcheon, David
    Smart, Lisa
    Vlad, Ioana
    Winearls, James
    Wibrow, Bradley
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [27] Optimised versus standard automated peritoneal dialysis regimens pilot study (OptiStAR): A randomised controlled crossover trial
    Bergling, Karin
    de Arteaga, Javier
    Ledesma, Fabian
    Oberg, Carl M.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 42 (06): : 615 - 621
  • [28] Torque visuomotor feedback training versus standard eccentric exercise for the management of patellar tendinopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Selvamoorthy, Ragul
    Arvanitidis, Michail
    Negro, Francesco
    Pincheira, Patricio
    Evans, David
    Martinez-Valdes, Eduardo
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02):
  • [29] Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of flooring to reduce injuries from falls in elderly care units: study protocol
    Drahota, Amy
    Gal, Diane
    Windsor, Julie
    Dixon, Simon
    Udell, Julie
    Ward, Derek
    Soilemezi, Dia
    Dean, Taraneh
    Severs, Martin
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2011, 17 (06) : 1 - 10
  • [30] Lung Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management versus Standard Care in Surgical ICU Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Rusu, Daniel-Mihai
    Grigoras, Ioana
    Blaj, Mihaela
    Siriopol, Ianis
    Ciumanghel, Adi-Ionut
    Sandu, Gigel
    Onofriescu, Mihai
    Lungu, Olguta
    Covic, Adrian Constantin
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (08)