Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

被引:3
|
作者
Clancy, C. [1 ]
Connelly, T. M. [1 ]
Jia, X. [1 ]
Lipman, J. [1 ]
Lightner, A. L. [1 ]
Hull, T. [1 ]
Steele, S. R. [1 ]
Holubar, S. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Digest Dis & Surg Inst, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Ileostomy; Ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Closure; Reversal; Timing; RISK-FACTORS; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; REVERSAL; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure.ResultsIleostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% (n = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% (n = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group (p = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01-16.57, p = 0.049).ConclusionsEarly closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1263
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TEMPORARY ILEOSTOMY FOR ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - FUNCTION AND COMPLICATIONS
    METCALF, AM
    DOZOIS, RR
    BEART, RW
    KELLY, KA
    WOLFF, BG
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1986, 29 (05) : 300 - 303
  • [22] Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis, Conventional Ileostomy and Ileorectal Anastomosis Modify Cholesterol Metabolism
    Markku J. Nissinen
    Helena Gylling
    Heikki J. Järvinen
    Tatu A. Miettinen
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2004, 49 : 1444 - 1453
  • [23] Defining the Safety of Early Ileostomy Closure After IPAA
    Clancy, C.
    Connelly, T.
    Jia, X.
    Lipman, J.
    Lightner, A.
    Hull, T.
    Steele, S.
    Holubar, S.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2022, 16 : I204 - I204
  • [24] COMPLICATIONS OF ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS (IPAA): IT'S NOT WHAT YOU MAY THINK.
    Whitney, S.
    LaChapelle, C.
    Plietz, M.
    George, J.
    Khaitov, S.
    Greenstein, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E345 - E345
  • [25] QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER PROCTOCOLECTOMY - A COMPARISON OF BROOKE ILEOSTOMY, KOCK POUCH, AND ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    KOHLER, LW
    PEMBERTON, JH
    ZINSMEISTER, AR
    KELLY, KA
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 101 (03) : 679 - 684
  • [26] Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Continent Ileostomy After a Failed Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Lian, Lei
    Fazio, Victor W.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Shen, Bo
    Dietz, David
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (08) : 1409 - 1414
  • [27] QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER BROOKE ILEOSTOMY AND ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS - COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE STATUS
    PEMBERTON, JH
    PHILLIPS, SF
    READY, RR
    ZINSMEISTER, AR
    BEAHRS, OH
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 209 (05) : 620 - 628
  • [28] THE ILEAL BRAKE AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    SOPER, NJ
    CHAPMAN, NJ
    KELLY, KA
    BROWN, ML
    PHILLIPS, SF
    GO, VLW
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 98 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [29] ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    KELLY, KA
    WOLFF, BG
    PEMBERTON, JH
    DOZOIS, RR
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 1992, 29 (02) : 59 - 131
  • [30] Which Is the Better Procedure for the Closure of Diverting Loop Ileostomy After Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis; Stapled or Hand-Sewn Anastomosis?
    Nagao, Munenori
    Watanabe, Kazuhiro
    Karasawa, Hideaki
    Abe, Tomoya
    Ohnuma, Shinobu
    Musha, Hiroaki
    Shibata, Chikashi
    Naitoh, Takeshi
    Unno, Michiaki
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S1186 - S1186