Taxes and director independence: evidence from board reforms worldwide

被引:13
|
作者
Li, Qingyuan [1 ]
Maydew, Edward L. [2 ]
Willis, Richard H. [3 ]
Xu, Li [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Luojia Hill, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, McColl Bldg,CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, 401 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Coll Business, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA
关键词
Corporate taxation; Board reform; Director independence; Corporate governance; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AVOIDANCE; AGGRESSIVENESS; TRANSPARENCY; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-021-09660-2
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether changes to corporate governance resulting from board reforms affect corporate tax behavior. While the connection between corporate governance and tax behavior has been the subject of intense interest in the literature, a lack of exogenous variation in governance has hampered inferences. Our inquiry exploits a set of major board reforms that capture shocks to board reforms for firms in 31 countries. The results indicate that corporate tax avoidance decreases significantly following major board reforms. We find that the influence of board reforms on corporate tax behavior is stronger in firms with relatively higher agency conflicts and more opaque information environments.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 957
页数:48
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Board Independence Matter? Evidence from New Zealand
    Koerniadi, Hardjo
    Tourani-Rad, Alireza
    AUSTRALASIAN ACCOUNTING BUSINESS AND FINANCE JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (02)
  • [22] Investor perceptions of board performance: Evidence from uncontested director elections
    Fischer, Paul E.
    Gramlich, Jeffrey D.
    Miller, Brian P.
    White, Hal D.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2009, 48 (2-3): : 172 - 189
  • [23] Board of director characteristics, institutional ownership, and fraud: Evidence from Australia
    Sharma, Vineeta D.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2004, 23 (02): : 105 - 117
  • [24] Board Reforms and Dividend Policy: International Evidence
    Bae, Kee-Hong
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    Zheng, Xiaolan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2021, 56 (04) : 1296 - 1320
  • [25] Board reforms and audit fees: international evidence
    Huang, Yuan
    Li, Xiao
    Song, Zilong
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2022, 29 (05) : 1227 - 1246
  • [26] Board reforms and the cost of equity: International evidence
    Li, Maoliang
    Wu, Ji
    Zhang, Liansheng
    Zou, Liping
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 60 (05): : 4497 - 4531
  • [27] Board reforms and the choice of debt: international evidence
    Xiao, Yige
    Tsang, Albert
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (01) : 240 - 273
  • [28] The efficacy of board independence on CSR practices: empirical evidence from China
    Cao, Ruili
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2023, 36 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [29] Board independence, firm performance and ownership concentration:: Evidence from Chile
    Lefort, Fernando
    Urzua, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (06) : 615 - 622
  • [30] The effects of board and auditor independence on earnings quality: evidence from Italy
    Ianniello G.
    Journal of Management & Governance, 2015, 19 (1) : 229 - 253