Patient Characteristics Associated with Growth of Patient-Derived Tumor Implants in Mice (Patient-Derived Xenografts)

被引:0
|
作者
Guerrero, Tatiana Hernandez [1 ]
Banos, Natalia [2 ]
Nevado, Laura del Puerto [3 ]
Mahillo-Fernandez, Ignacio [2 ,3 ]
De-Speville, Bernard Doger [2 ]
Calvo, Emiliano [4 ]
Wick, Michael [5 ]
Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus [2 ,3 ]
Moreno, Victor [2 ]
机构
[1] START Barcelona HM Nou Delfos, Avinguda Vallcarca 151, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] START Madrid Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Ave Reyes Catolicos 2, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] IIS Fdn Jimenez Diaz UAM, Translat Oncol Div, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] START Madrid CIOCC HM Sanchinarro, C Ona 10, Madrid 28050, Spain
[5] XENOStart START San Antonio, 4383 Med Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
patient-derived xenografts; PDX; mice; models; translational; prediction; engraftment; tumor growth; cancer; oncology; preclinical; SERUM LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE; MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY; NUDE-MICE; OVARIAN-CANCER; LUNG CANCERS; CELL-LINES; MODELS; ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15225402
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have defined the field of translational cancer research in recent years, becoming one of the most-used tools in early drug development. The process of establishing cancer models in mice has turned out to be challenging, since little research focuses on evaluating which factors impact engraftment success. We sought to determine the clinical, pathological, or molecular factors which may predict better engraftment rates in PDXs. Methods: between March 2017 and January 2021, tumor samples obtained from patients with primary or metastatic cancer were implanted into athymic nude mice. A full comprehensive evaluation of baseline factors associated with the patients and patients' tumors was performed, with the goal of potentially identifying predictive markers of engraftment. We focused on clinical (patient factors) pathological (patients' tumor samples) and molecular (patients' tumor samples) characteristics, analyzed either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), which were associated with the likelihood of final engraftment, as well as with tumor growth rates in xenografts. Results: a total of 585 tumor samples were collected and implanted. Twenty-one failed to engraft, due to lack of malignant cells. Of 564 tumor-positive samples, 187 (33.2%) grew at time of analysis. The study was able to find correlation and predictive value for engraftment for the following: the use of systemic antibiotics by the patient within 2 weeks of sampling (38.1% (72/189) antibiotics- group vs. 30.7% (115/375) no-antibiotics) (p = 0.048), and the administration of systemic steroids to the patients within 2 weeks of sampling (41.5% (34/48) steroids vs. 31.7% (153/329), no-steroids) (p = 0.049). Regarding patient's baseline tests, we found certain markers could help predict final engraftment success: for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, 34.1% (140/411) of tumors derived from patients with baseline blood LDH levels above the upper limit of normality (ULN) achieved growth, against 30.7% (47/153) with normal LDH (p = 0.047). Histological tumor characteristics, such as grade of differentiation, were also correlated. Grade 1: 25.4% (47/187), grade 2: 34.8% (65/187) and grade 3: 40.1% (75/187) tumors achieved successful growth (p = 0.043), suggesting the higher the grade, the higher the likelihood of success. Similarly, higher ki67 levels were also correlated with better engraftment rates: low (Ki67 < 15%): 8.9% (9/45) achieved growth vs. high (Ki67 >= 15%): 31% (35/113) (p: 0.002). Other markers of aggressiveness such as the presence of lymphovascular invasion in tumor sample of origin was also predictive: 42.2% (97/230) with lymphovascular vs. 26.9% (90/334) of samples with no invasion (p = 0.0001). From the molecular standpoint, mismatch-repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors showed better engraftment rates: 62.1% (18/29) achieved growth vs. 40.8% (75/184) of proficient tumors (p = 0.026). A total of 84 PDX were breast models, among which 57.9% (11/19) ER-negative models grew, vs. 15.4% (10/65) of ER-positive models (p = 0.0001), also consonant with ER-negative tumors being more aggressive. BRAFmut cancers are more likely to achieve engraftment during the development of PDX models. Lastly, tumor growth rates during first passages can help establish a cutoff point for the decision-making process during PDX development, since the higher the tumor grades, the higher the likelihood of success. Conclusions: tumors with higher grade and Ki67 protein expression, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, with dMMR and are negative for ER expression have a higher probability of achieving growth in the process of PDX development. The use of steroids and/or antibiotics in the patient prior to sampling can also impact the likelihood of success in PDX development. Lastly, establishing a cutoff point for tumor growth rates could guide the decision-making process during PDX development.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-derived xenografts as preclinical neuroblastoma models
    Noémie Braekeveldt
    Daniel Bexell
    Cell and Tissue Research, 2018, 372 : 233 - 243
  • [32] Patient-Derived Xenografts as Tools in Pharmaceutical Development
    Izumchenko, E.
    Meir, J.
    Bedi, A.
    Wysocki, P. T.
    Hoque, M. O.
    Sidransky, D.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 99 (06) : 612 - 621
  • [33] Biopsy Patient-Derived Xenografts for Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancers
    Hernandez, M.
    Yang, L.
    Leiting, J.
    Bergquist, J.
    Truty, M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : S115 - S115
  • [34] Towards precision oncology with patient-derived xenografts
    Eugenia R. Zanella
    Elena Grassi
    Livio Trusolino
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2022, 19 : 719 - 732
  • [35] Modeling of Patient-Derived Xenografts in Colorectal Cancer
    Katsiampoura, Anastasia
    Raghav, Kanwal
    Jiang, Zhi-Qin
    Menter, David G.
    Varkaris, Andreas
    Morelli, Maria P.
    Manuel, Shanequa
    Wu, Ji
    Sorokin, Alexey V.
    Rizi, Bahar Salimian
    Bristow, Christopher
    Tian, Feng
    Airhart, Susan
    Cheng, Mingshan
    Broom, Bradley M.
    Morris, Jeffrey
    Overman, Michael J.
    Powis, Garth
    Kopetz, Scott
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 16 (07) : 1435 - 1442
  • [36] MOLECULAR PROFILING OF PATIENT-DERIVED MYELOMA XENOGRAFTS
    Koh, Y.
    Kim, H. J.
    Lee, H. J.
    Jung, W. J.
    Lee, C.
    Yoon, H. J.
    Ahn, K. S.
    Yoon, S. S.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2014, 99 : 358 - 358
  • [37] An immunocompromised zebrafish to test patient-derived xenografts
    Ellen P. Neff
    Lab Animal, 2019, 48 : 202 - 202
  • [38] Establishment of Novel Gastric Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts and Cell Lines: Pathological Comparison between Primary Tumor, Patient-Derived, and Cell-Line Derived Xenografts
    Kuwata, Takeshi
    Yanagihara, Kazuyoshi
    Iino, Yuki
    Komatsu, Teruo
    Ochiai, Atsushi
    Sekine, Shigeki
    Taniguchi, Hirokazu
    Katai, Hitoshi
    Kinoshita, Takahiro
    Ohtsu, Atsushi
    CELLS, 2019, 8 (06)
  • [39] Tumor characteristics associated with engraftment of patient-derived non-small cell lung cancer xenografts in immunocompromised mice
    Chen, Yungchang
    Zhang, Ran
    Wang, Li
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Pataer, Apar
    Xu, Yi
    Zhang, Xiaoshan
    Ren, Chenghui
    Wu, Shuhong
    Meng, Qing H.
    Fujimoto, Junya
    Jensen, Vanessa B.
    Antonoff, Mara B.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Pisimisis, George
    Rice, David C.
    Sepesi, Boris
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Walsh, Garrett L.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    Roth, Jack A.
    Heymach, John, V
    Fang, Bingliang
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (21) : 3738 - 3748
  • [40] Co-Residence of Patient-Derived Immune Cells in Patient-Derived Xenografts from Lung Cancer Patients
    Pu, X.
    Zhang, R.
    Wang, L.
    Pataer, A.
    Meraz, I. M.
    Zhang, X.
    Wu, S.
    Chen, Y.
    Wu, L.
    Su, D.
    Mao, W.
    Heymach, J.
    Roth, J. A. Jack A.
    Swisher, S.
    Fang, B.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S528 - S528