A spatial multi-criteria decision analysis framework to reveal vulnerabilities of areas to incidences of street robberies

被引:4
|
作者
Rosa, Amanda Gadelha Ferreira [1 ]
Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda [1 ]
de Figueiredo, Ciro Jose Jardim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Engn Prod, Av Prof Moraes Rego,1235 Cidade Univ, Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rural Semi Arido, Dept Engn, Rua Gamaliel Martins Bezerra Alto Alegria, Angicos, RN, Brazil
关键词
Multiple -criteria decision analysis; Geographic information systems; Public security planning; ROUGH SET APPROACH; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION; CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY; SELF-CONTROL; CRIME; PATTERNS; OPPORTUNITY; HOMICIDE; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102840
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Violence in public spaces is an aspect of society that demands analysis since this affects social and economic well-being. On setting out to explore the incidence of violence in public areas, this paper brings a multi-methodology framework to associate the exploratory analysis of data on street robberies with a geographic information system (GIS) and a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) model. Our GIS-MCDA framework is based on a Dominance -based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) and induces the decision-maker to learn and understand the spatial, social, and demographic data on crime analysis. As a result, the study area was classified into levels of vulnerability. We found that the social interaction features, bus stops and street robberies are spatially and statistically associated. From the socio-demographic perspective, makeshift houses, the number of people who can read and write and the number of inhabitants were highlighted as dimensions to be considered when associated with crime. Finally, preferences in evaluation of areas of vulnerability tend to be pessimistic. Therefore, the multi-methodology framework makes a holistic analysis of such vulnerabilities and contributes to improve knowledge on urban spaces and how this informs detecting vulnerability to crime.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in protected areas
    de Castro, Monica
    Urios, Vicente
    ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2016, 16 (02): : 89 - 109
  • [32] Equitable Prioritization of Bridge Rehabilitation Projects Using a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework
    Mohamadiazar, Nasim
    Ebrahimian, Ali
    Azizinamini, Atorod
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (12) : 2059 - 2076
  • [33] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS IN ONCOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW
    Adunlin, G.
    Diaby, V
    Montero, A.
    Xiao, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A184 - A184
  • [34] Potential Nondominance in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Podinovski, Vladislav
    Nelyubin, Andrey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2024, 23 (03) : 1401 - 1422
  • [35] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [36] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [37] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [38] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [39] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Thokala, Praveen
    Madhavan, Guruprasad
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [40] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226