Reshaping National Organ Allocation Policy

被引:1
|
作者
Papalexopoulos, Theodore [1 ]
Alcorn, James [2 ]
Bertsimas, Dimitris [1 ]
Goff, Rebecca [2 ]
Stewart, Darren [3 ]
Trichakis, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Operat Res Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[3] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
fairness; policy design; multi-objective optimization; resource allocation; fairness and efficiency tradeoff; organ allocation; LIVER ALLOCATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2022.0035
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network (OPTN) initiated in 2018 a major overhaul of all U.S. deceased-donor organ allocation policies, aiming to gradually migrate them to a so-called continuous distribution model, with the goal of creating an allocation system that is more efficient, more equitable, and more inclusive. Development of policies within this model, however, represents a major challenge because multiple efficiency and fairness objectives need to be delicately balanced. We introduce a novel analytical framework that leverages machine learning, simulation, and optimization to illuminate policy tradeoffs and enable dynamic exploration of the efficient frontier of policy options. In collaboration with the OPTN, we applied the framework to design a new national allocation policy for lungs. Since March 9, 2023, all deceased-donor lungs in the United States have been allocated according to this policy that we helped design, projected to reduce waitlist mortality by approximately 20% compared with current policy based on simulations. We discuss how we extended our collaboration with the OPTN to the redesign of kidney, pancreas, heart, and liver allocation and how our framework can be applied to other application domains, such as school choice or public housing allocation systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Organ transplantation: Evolving a national transplantation policy and methodology in Israel
    Penchas, S
    Roll, M
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (04) : 2345 - 2348
  • [32] RESHAPING NATO NUCLEAR POLICY
    SHARP, JMO
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 1985, 41 (04) : 38 - 44
  • [35] THE RESHAPING OF THE NATIONAL-LABOR-RELATIONS-BOARD - NATIONAL LABOR POLICY IN TRANSITION 1937-1947 - GROSS,JA
    BABCOCK, RH
    RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1983, 38 (01): : 188 - 189
  • [36] MELD ORIENTED ORGAN ALLOCATION POLICY AND WAITING LIST FOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN ROMANIA
    Gheorghe, Liana
    Iacob, Speranta
    Smira, Gabriela
    Pietrareanu, Corina
    Hrehoret, Doina
    Brasoveanu, Vladislav
    Iacob, Razvan
    Gheorghe, Cristian
    Popescu, Irinel
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 : 291 - 291
  • [37] Evolution of liver transplant organ allocation policy: Current limitations and future directions
    Alexander Polyak
    Alexander Kuo
    Vinay Sundaram
    World Journal of Hepatology, 2021, (08) : 830 - 839
  • [38] An Evidence-Based Analysis for Liver Transplants: Insights for Organ Allocation Policy
    Cai, Yuanfeng
    Vogit, Michael
    Zhu, Dan
    AMCIS 2015 PROCEEDINGS, 2015,
  • [39] IMPACT OF THE ACUITY CIRCLES ORGAN ALLOCATION POLICY ON LOCAL USE OF DCD LIVERS
    Kumar, Smriti
    Goldberg, David S.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 851A - 851A
  • [40] Strategic Changes in Organ Allocation Policy and Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Liver Failure
    Bangerth, Sarah
    Vijayendra, Shrestha
    Ascher-Bartlett, Johanna
    Etasami, Kambiz
    Kohli, Rohit
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    JAMA SURGERY, 2025, 160 (01) : 102 - 105